Literature DB >> 31189190

Validation of a Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Monitor: Polar OH1.

Eric Hermand1,2, Johan Cassirame3,4, Gaël Ennequin5, Olivier Hue1.   

Abstract

This study assessed the validity of a photoplethysmographic heart rate (HR) monitor, the Polar OH1 in various sports performed in ecological conditions: running, cycling, soccer, kayaking, walking, tennis and fitness. Seventy trained athletes (56 males, 14 females) wore the Polar OH1 armband and the H7 chest belt during training. A total of 390 h and 38 min of recording were compared using a 20-bpm window to assess data quality, and Bland-Altman agreements and ICC analyses were used to test accuracy. Linear regression analyses evaluated the HR accuracy and correlation with skin tone. Training loads (TRIMPs) were compared for each session. Reliability was high for endurance sports (>99%) and lower for sports involving arm movements (92~95%). Biases were slightly negative for all sports, whereas widths of limits of agreement varied from 7-20bpm. Bland-Altman agreements were all under 5% except tennis, kayak and fitness. HR accuracy was positively correlated to skin tone (p<0.05). Finally, TRIMPs from the OH1 device were inferior to criterion's (except walking and soccer), within a 3% range from reference. Hence, OH1 represents a valid tool to monitor instantaneous HR and training load, especially for endurance sports. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31189190     DOI: 10.1055/a-0875-4033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  7 in total

1.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.

Authors:  Jan M Mühlen; Julie Stang; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina-Garcia; William Johnston; Luís B Sardinha; Francisco B Ortega; Brian Caulfield; Wilhelm Bloch; Sulin Cheng; Ulf Ekelund; Jan Christian Brønd; Anders Grøntved; Moritz Schumann
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Sources of Inaccuracy in Photoplethysmography for Continuous Cardiovascular Monitoring.

Authors:  Jesse Fine; Kimberly L Branan; Andres J Rodriguez; Tananant Boonya-Ananta; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Michael J McShane; Gerard L Coté
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  A Rare Case of Ciprofloxacin-Induced Bradycardia Recognized by a Smartwatch.

Authors:  Andres Cordova Sanchez; Moeed Chohan; Oluwateniola Olatunde; Catherine White
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 4.  Caveats and Recommendations to Assess the Validity and Reliability of Cycling Power Meters: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anthony Bouillod; Georges Soto-Romero; Frederic Grappe; William Bertucci; Emmanuel Brunet; Johan Cassirame
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Wrist-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure While Sitting or Performing Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activity: Validation Study.

Authors:  Peter Düking; Laura Giessing; Marie Ottilie Frenkel; Karsten Koehler; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Validation of the Polar OH1 and M600 optical heart rate sensors during front crawl swim training.

Authors:  Bjørn Harald Olstad; Christoph Zinner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Smart Electrically Assisted Bicycles as Health Monitoring Systems: A Review.

Authors:  Eli Gabriel Avina-Bravo; Johan Cassirame; Christophe Escriba; Pascal Acco; Jean-Yves Fourniols; Georges Soto-Romero
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.