Bo Yao1, Jian-Yu Liu2, Yun-Bo Sun1, Yu-Xiao Zhao1, Lian-di Li1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. 2. The Institute of Organ Transplantation, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It is necessary to evaluate fluid responsiveness before fluid resuscitation. We evaluated the value of inferior vena cava (IVC) area respiratory variation and the IVC diameter ratio (IVC DR) for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in the intensive care unit between December 2017 and March 2018. Mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled and received ultrasound monitoring. IVC diameter distensibility index from the subxiphoid area (IVC-sx DDI), IVC diameter distensibility index from the right midaxillary line (IVC-rm DDI), IVC area distensibility index (IVC ADI), and IVC DR in cross-section were calculated by ultrasound monitoring IVC parameters. The enrolled patients were classified as nonresponders group and responders group according to whether the cardiac output increased by >10% after passive leg raising. RESULTS: Data from 67 mechanically ventilated patients were analyzed. 55.2% of patients had positive fluid responsiveness. The area of receiver operating characteristic curves evaluating the ability of the IVC-sx DDI, IVC-rm DDI, IVC ADI, and IVC DR to predict the fluid responsiveness were 0.702, 0.686, 0.749, and 0.829, respectively. IVC DR level of 1.43 was predictive of positive fluid responsiveness with 90.0% specificity and 67.6% sensitivity. IVC ADI level of 10.2% was predictive of positive fluid responsiveness with 40.0% specificity and 97.3% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: IVC ADI and its diameter ratio in cross-section had more value than IVC diameter distensibility index for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
INTRODUCTION: It is necessary to evaluate fluid responsiveness before fluid resuscitation. We evaluated the value of inferior vena cava (IVC) area respiratory variation and the IVC diameter ratio (IVC DR) for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in the intensive care unit between December 2017 and March 2018. Mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled and received ultrasound monitoring. IVC diameter distensibility index from the subxiphoid area (IVC-sx DDI), IVC diameter distensibility index from the right midaxillary line (IVC-rm DDI), IVC area distensibility index (IVC ADI), and IVC DR in cross-section were calculated by ultrasound monitoring IVC parameters. The enrolled patients were classified as nonresponders group and responders group according to whether the cardiac output increased by >10% after passive leg raising. RESULTS: Data from 67 mechanically ventilated patients were analyzed. 55.2% of patients had positive fluid responsiveness. The area of receiver operating characteristic curves evaluating the ability of the IVC-sx DDI, IVC-rm DDI, IVC ADI, and IVC DR to predict the fluid responsiveness were 0.702, 0.686, 0.749, and 0.829, respectively. IVC DR level of 1.43 was predictive of positive fluid responsiveness with 90.0% specificity and 67.6% sensitivity. IVC ADI level of 10.2% was predictive of positive fluid responsiveness with 40.0% specificity and 97.3% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: IVC ADI and its diameter ratio in cross-section had more value than IVC diameter distensibility index for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.