Literature DB >> 31188524

Magnetosome magnetite biomineralization in a flagellated protist: evidence for an early evolutionary origin for magnetoreception in eukaryotes.

Pedro Leão1, Lucas Le Nagard2, Hao Yuan2, Jefferson Cypriano1, Inácio Da Silva-Neto3, Dennis A Bazylinski4, Daniel Acosta-Avalos5, Henrique L de Barros5, Adam P Hitchcock2, Ulysses Lins1, Fernanda Abreu1.   

Abstract

The most well-recognized magnetoreception behaviour is that of the magnetotactic bacteria (MTB), which synthesize membrane-bounded magnetic nanocrystals called magnetosomes via a biologically controlled process. The magnetic minerals identified in prokaryotic magnetosomes are magnetite (Fe3 O4 ) and greigite (Fe3 S4 ). Magnetosome crystals, regardless of composition, have consistent, species-specific morphologies and single-domain size range. Because of these features, magnetosome magnetite crystals possess specific properties in comparison to abiotic, chemically synthesized magnetite. Despite numerous discoveries regarding MTB phylogeny over the last decades, this diversity is still considered underestimated. Characterization of magnetotactic microorganisms is important as it might provide insights into the origin and establishment of magnetoreception in general, including eukaryotes. Here, we describe the magnetotactic behaviour and characterize the magnetosomes from a flagellated protist using culture-independent methods. Results strongly suggest that, unlike previously described magnetotactic protists, this flagellate is capable of biomineralizing its own anisotropic magnetite magnetosomes, which are aligned in complex aggregations of multiple chains within the cell. This organism has a similar response to magnetic field inversions as MTB. Therefore, this eukaryotic species might represent an early origin of magnetoreception based on magnetite biomineralization. It should add to the definition of parameters and criteria to classify biogenic magnetite in the fossil record.
© 2019 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31188524     DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  5 in total

1.  Magnetotactic bacteria in vertical sediments of volcanic lakes in NE China appear Alphaproteobacteria dominated distribution regardless of waterbody types.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Huiyun Da; Shuang Zhang; Weidong Wang; Hong Pan; Lei Yan
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Therapeutic Applications of Magnetotactic Bacteria and Magnetosomes: A Review Emphasizing on the Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Sai Manogna Kotakadi; Deva Prasad Raju Borelli; John Sushma Nannepaga
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses in the Slipper Snail Crepidula fornicata Uncover Shell Matrix Genes Expressed During Adult and Larval Biomineralization.

Authors:  G O Batzel; B K Moreno; L S Lopez; C K Nguyen; B T Livingston; D Joester; D C Lyons
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-08-10

4.  Intracellular amorphous Ca-carbonate and magnetite biomineralization by a magnetotactic bacterium affiliated to the Alphaproteobacteria.

Authors:  Caroline L Monteil; Karim Benzerara; Nicolas Menguy; Cécile C Bidaud; Emmanuel Michot-Achdjian; Romain Bolzoni; François P Mathon; Margot Coutaud; Béatrice Alonso; Camille Garau; Didier Jézéquel; Eric Viollier; Nicolas Ginet; Magali Floriani; Sufal Swaraj; Martin Sachse; Vincent Busigny; Elodie Duprat; François Guyot; Christopher T Lefevre
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  New Phenotype and Mineralization of Biogenic Iron Oxide in Magnetotactic Bacteria.

Authors:  Walid Baaziz; Corneliu Ghica; Jefferson Cypriano; Fernanda Abreu; Karine Anselme; Ovidiu Ersen; Marcos Farina; Jacques Werckmann
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.