Literature DB >> 31188449

Structural and functional imaging of large and opaque plant specimens.

Linnea Hesse1,2, Katharina Bunk1,2, Jochen Leupold3, Thomas Speck1,2,4, Tom Masselter1,2.   

Abstract

Three- and four-dimensional imaging techniques are a prerequisite for spatially resolving the form-structure-function relationships in plants. However, choosing the right imaging method is a difficult and time-consuming process as the imaging principles, advantages and limitations, as well as the appropriate fields of application first need to be compared. The present study aims to provide an overview of three imaging methods that allow for imaging opaque, large and thick (>5 mm, up to several centimeters), hierarchically organized plant samples that can have complex geometries. We compare light microscopy of serial thin sections followed by 3D reconstruction (LMTS3D) as an optical imaging technique, micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) based on ionizing radiation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which uses the natural magnetic properties of a sample for image acquisition. We discuss the most important imaging principles, advantages, and limitations, and suggest fields of application for each imaging technique (LMTS, µ-CT, and MRI) with regard to static (at a given time; 3D) and dynamic (at different time points; quasi 4D) structural and functional plant imaging.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  3D versus 4D plant imaging; Biomechanics; computed tomography; functional plant imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; microscopy; nuclear magnetic rtesonance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31188449     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  5 in total

1.  4D pine scale: biomimetic 4D printed autonomous scale and flap structures capable of multi-phase movement.

Authors:  David Correa; Simon Poppinga; Max D Mylo; Anna S Westermeier; Bernd Bruchmann; Achim Menges; Thomas Speck
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A seed flying like a bullet: ballistic seed dispersal in Chinese witch-hazel (Hamamelis mollis OLIV., Hamamelidaceae).

Authors:  Simon Poppinga; Anne-Sophie Böse; Robin Seidel; Linnea Hesse; Jochen Leupold; Sandra Caliaro; Thomas Speck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Failure mechanisms and bending strength of Fuchsia magellanica var. gracilis stems.

Authors:  Timothy Hone; Max Mylo; Olga Speck; Thomas Speck; David Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Plant biomechanics in the 21st century.

Authors:  Anja Geitmann; Karl Niklas; Thomas Speck
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Elastic property and fracture mechanics of lateral branch-branch junctions in cacti: A case study of Opuntia ficus-indica and Cylindropuntia bigelovii.

Authors:  Max D Mylo; Anna Hoppe; Lars Pastewka; Thomas Speck; Olga Speck
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.