| Literature DB >> 31188449 |
Linnea Hesse1,2, Katharina Bunk1,2, Jochen Leupold3, Thomas Speck1,2,4, Tom Masselter1,2.
Abstract
Three- and four-dimensional imaging techniques are a prerequisite for spatially resolving the form-structure-function relationships in plants. However, choosing the right imaging method is a difficult and time-consuming process as the imaging principles, advantages and limitations, as well as the appropriate fields of application first need to be compared. The present study aims to provide an overview of three imaging methods that allow for imaging opaque, large and thick (>5 mm, up to several centimeters), hierarchically organized plant samples that can have complex geometries. We compare light microscopy of serial thin sections followed by 3D reconstruction (LMTS3D) as an optical imaging technique, micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) based on ionizing radiation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which uses the natural magnetic properties of a sample for image acquisition. We discuss the most important imaging principles, advantages, and limitations, and suggest fields of application for each imaging technique (LMTS, µ-CT, and MRI) with regard to static (at a given time; 3D) and dynamic (at different time points; quasi 4D) structural and functional plant imaging.Keywords: 3D versus 4D plant imaging; Biomechanics; computed tomography; functional plant imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; microscopy; nuclear magnetic rtesonance
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31188449 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992