Literature DB >> 31188229

Effects of Brimonidine and Timolol on the Progression of Visual Field Defects in Open-angle Glaucoma: A Single-center Randomized Trial.

Yu Yokoyama1, Ryo Kawasaki2,3, Hidetoshi Takahashi1,4, Shigeto Maekawa5, Satoru Tsuda1, Kazuko Omodaka1, Toru Nakazawa5,6.   

Abstract

PRéCIS:: Instillation of brimonidine or timolol slowed visual field deterioration in patients with open-angle glaucoma; both brimonidine and timolol might improve the mean deviation (MD) slopes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of 0.1% brimonidine and 0.5% timolol on the progressing visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 1 eye each of 68 glaucoma patients who were treated with at least 1 prostaglandin analog. Their baseline MD slopes were < -0.5 dB/y based on at least 5 Humphrey field analyzer measurements within 3 years. Eligible eyes were randomly assigned to brimonidine or timolol treatment groups and treatments were administered without the wash-out period. Clinical examinations were performed every 4 months for 2 years. We designated the MD slope as the primary endpoint.
RESULTS: Ultimately, 56 eyes (brimonidine:timolol=26:30) were included in the present study (mean age=65.2 y). Dropout rates of brimonidine and timolol treatment groups were 27.8% and 6.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline intraocular pressure or MD slopes between brimonidine and timolol groups (12.7 and 12.9 mm Hg, P=0.77, and -1.22 and -1.08 dB/y, P=0.43, respectively). Intraocular pressure decreased significantly in the brimonidine group at 4, 8, 12, and 16 months, and in the timolol group at 4 months, without significant differences between the drugs (P=0.20). MD slopes significantly improved in both groups (brimonidine: -0.38 dB/y, P<0.001; timolol: -0.52 dB/y, P=0.04). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between groups in the primary endpoint (P=0.59).
CONCLUSION: Brimonidine and timolol treatments improved MD slopes in open-angle glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31188229      PMCID: PMC7055936          DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  40 in total

Review 1.  The evolving pharmacotherapeutic profile of brimonidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, after four years of continuous use.

Authors:  L B Cantor
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.889

2.  Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing latanoprost with timolol in the treatment of patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  W Y Zhang; A L Po; H S Dua; A Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Higher prevalence of myocilin mutations in advanced glaucoma in comparison with less advanced disease in an Australasian disease registry.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Souzeau; Kathryn P Burdon; Andrew Dubowsky; Scott Grist; Bronwyn Usher; Jude T Fitzgerald; April Crawford; Alex W Hewitt; Ivan Goldberg; Richard A Mills; Jonathan B Ruddle; John Landers; David A Mackey; Jamie E Craig
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Brimonidine-purite 0.1% versus brimonidine-purite 0.15% twice daily in glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a 12-month randomized trial.

Authors:  Louis B Cantor; Eleonora Safyan; Ching-Chi Liu; Amy L Batoosingh
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.580

5.  The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; Boel Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; M Cristina Leske
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Risk factors for glaucoma onset and progression.

Authors:  Anne L Coleman; Stefano Miglior
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 8.  Risk assessment in the management of patients with ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; David S Friedman; Robert D Fechtner; George A Cioffi; Anne L Coleman; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Kuldev Singh; M Roy Wilson; Richard Wilson; William B Kannel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Age- and sex-dependency of the association between systemic antioxidant potential and glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Yoshimi Asano; Noriko Himori; Hiroshi Kunikata; Mai Yamazaki; Yukihiro Shiga; Kazuko Omodaka; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Characteristics of patients with primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma at a university hospital: a cross-sectional retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu Yokoyama; Kazuichi Maruyama; Hideyuki Konno; Sayaka Hashimoto; Mai Takahashi; Hiroko Kayaba; Taiki Kokubun; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-08-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Ocular and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Brimonidine and Timolol After Topical Administration in Rabbits: Comparison Between Fixed-Combination and Single Drugs.

Authors:  Gen Suzuki; Eriko Kunikane; Keisuke Shinno; Seiko Kozai; Masaaki Kurata; Akio Kawamura
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2020-01-17

2.  Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (ARTEMIS 2).

Authors:  Jason Bacharach; Andrew Tatham; Gloria Ferguson; Sandra Belalcázar; Hagen Thieme; Margot L Goodkin; Michelle Y Chen; Qiang Guo; Jeen Liu; Michael R Robinson; Marina Bejanian; David L Wirta
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.