Literature DB >> 31188180

Achieving a Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation That Does Not Require Surgical Resection: It May Take Longer Than You Think!

Angelita Habr-Gama1,2, Guilherme P São Julião1, Laura M Fernandez1, Bruna B Vailati1, Andres Andrade1, Sérgio E A Araújo2, Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues1,2, Rodrigo O Perez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with rectal cancer who achieve complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been managed by organ-preserving strategies and acceptable long-term outcomes. Controversy still exists regarding optimal timing for the assessment of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the time interval for achieving complete clinical response using strict endoscopic and clinical criteria after a single neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimen.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients managed by 54-Gy and consolidation 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Assessment of response was performed at 10 weeks after radiation. Patients with suspected complete clinical response were offered watch-and-wait strategy and reassessment every 6 to 8 weeks until achievement of strict criteria of complete clinical response or overt residual cancer. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients with complete clinical response who underwent a successful watch-and-wait strategy until last follow-up were eligible. Dates of radiation completion and achievement of strict endoscopic and clinical criteria (mucosal whitening, teleangiectasia, and no ulceration or irregularity) were recorded. Patients with incomplete response or with initial complete clinical response followed by local recurrence or regrowth were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The distribution of time intervals between completion of radiation and achievement of strict complete clinical response was measured. Patients who achieved early complete clinical response (≤16 wk) were compared with late complete clinical response (>16 wk).
RESULTS: A total of 49 patients achieved complete clinical response and were successfully managed nonoperatively. A median interval of 18.7 weeks was observed for achieving strict complete clinical response. Only 38% of patients achieved complete clinical response between 10 and 16 weeks from radiation completion. Patients with earlier cT status (cT2/T3a) achieved a complete clinical response significantly earlier when compared with those patients with more advanced disease (T3b-d/4; 19 vs 26 wk; p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study with a small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment at 10 to 16 weeks may detect a minority of patients who achieve complete clinical response without additional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Patients suspected for a complete clinical response should be considered for reassessment beyond 16 weeks before definitive management when considered for a watch and wait strategy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A901.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31188180     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  20 in total

1.  A new magnetic resonance imaging tumour response grading scheme for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaolin Pang; Peiyi Xie; Li Yu; Haiyang Chen; Jian Zheng; Xiaochun Meng; Xiangbo Wan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 9.075

2.  Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence.

Authors:  Karen Benezery; Lucile Montagne; Ludovic Evesque; Renaud Schiappa; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi; Eric Francois; Brice Thamphya; Jean-Pierre Gerard
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-06

Review 3.  The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Mariana Berho; Rodrigo O Perez; Steven D Wexner; Manish Chand
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  An-Sofie Verrijssen; José Guillem; Rodrigo Perez; Krzysztof Bujko; Nathalie Guedj; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ruud Houben; Danny Goudkade; Jarno Melenhorst; Jeroen Buijsen; Ben Vanneste; Heike I Grabsch; Murillo Bellezzo; Gabriel Paiva Fonseca; Frank Verhaegen; Maaike Berbee; Evert J Van Limbergen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Endoscopic and MRI response evaluation following neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: a pictorial review with matched MRI, endoscopic, and pathologic examples.

Authors:  Seth I Felder; Sebastian Feuerlein; Arthur Parsee; Iman Imanirad; Julian Sanchez; Sophie Dessureault; Richard Kim; Sarah Hoffe; Jessica Frakes; James Costello
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 6.  Biology-and Location-Oriented Precision Treatment of Rectal Cancer: Present and Future.

Authors:  Stefan Fichtner-Feigl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-09-16

7.  Watch and Wait Approach After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience in the Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Reena Engineer; Avanish Saklani; Ashwin D'souza; Supreeta Arya; Suman Kumar; Vikas Ostwal; Anant Ramaswamy; Supriya Chopra; Prachi Patil
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-09

Review 8.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in organ-preserving strategies for the management of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Cinthia D Ortega; Rodrigo O Perez
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-05-30

9.  MRI Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: 2020 Guide for Practice from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyun Cho; Sang Hyun Choi; Jong Keon Jang; Min Ju Kim; Seung Ho Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Ji Hoon Park; Nieun Seo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Burden of disease experienced by patients following a watch-and-wait policy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Alexander J Pennings; Merel L Kimman; Anke H C Gielen; Geerard L Beets; Jarno Melenhorst; Stephanie O Breukink
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.