| Literature DB >> 31187920 |
Xiongtao Dai1, Pantelis Hadjipantelis2, Jane-Ling Wang2, Sean C L Deoni3,4, Hans-Georg Müller2.
Abstract
From birth to 5 years of age, brain structure matures and evolves alongside emerging cognitive and behavioral abilities. In relating concurrent cognitive functioning and measures of brain structure, a major challenge that has impeded prior investigation of their time-dynamic relationships is the sparse and irregular nature of most longitudinal neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how this problem can be addressed by applying functional concurrent regression models (FCRMs) to longitudinal cognitive and neuroimaging data. The application of FCRM in neuroimaging is illustrated with longitudinal neuroimaging and cognitive data acquired from a large cohort (n = 210) of healthy children, 2-48 months of age. Quantifying white matter myelination by using myelin water fraction (MWF) as imaging metric derived from MRI scans, application of this methodology reveals an early period (200-500 days) during which whole brain and regional white matter structure, as quantified by MWF, is positively associated with cognitive ability, while we found no such association for whole brain white matter volume. Adjusting for baseline covariates including socioeconomic status as measured by maternal education (SES-ME), infant feeding practice, gender, and birth weight further reveals an increasing association between SES-ME and cognitive development with child age. These results shed new light on the emerging patterns of brain and cognitive development, indicating that FCRM provides a useful tool for investigating these evolving relationships.Entities:
Keywords: brain MRI; cognitive development; concurrent regression modeling; infant brain development; myelination
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31187920 PMCID: PMC6771612 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
Figure 1Distributions for age‐at‐all‐scans combined (red), age at first scan (green), and age‐at‐last‐scan (blue) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Study population demographics for the whole sample
| Gender | |
| Male ( | 120 |
| Female ( | 90 |
| Racial background | |
| Caucasian ( | 114 |
| African American ( | 26 |
| Asian ( | 6 |
| Hispanic ( | 22 |
| Mixed race ( | 42 |
| Parent marital status | |
| Married/living together ( | 162 |
| Divorced/single ( | 48 |
| Number of times scanned |
1×:2×:3×:4×+ 93:60:30:27 |
| Age‐at‐all‐scans | 584.1 ± 402.0 |
| Age‐at‐first‐scan | 473.6 ± 423.9 |
| Age‐at‐last‐scan | 753.2 ± 431.2 |
| Number of children in family ( | 2.1 ± 1.2 |
| Gestation (weeks) | 39.5 ± 1.3 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3,350 ± 487 |
| Birth length (cm) | 51 ± 3.06 |
| Maternal education | 5.74 ± 1.14 |
| Paternal education | 5.70 ± 1.08 |
| ELC | 101.0 ± 16.7 |
| NVDQ | 108.3 ± 17.9 |
| VDQ | 101.5 ± 22.0 |
Figure 2Longitudinal growth measurements (height, weight, whole brain white matter MWF) and cognitive scores (ELC, NVDQ, and VDQ) made at scans. The bold curves are the estimated mean curves over time by local quadratic smoothing, and the shaded bands are 95% confidence intervals (very narrow for white matter MWF) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Age‐optimized mcDESPOT protocols
| Age group (months) | 3–9 | 9–16 | 16–28 | 28–48 | 48+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Field of view (cm3) | 14 × 14 × 13 | 17 × 17 × 14.4 | 18 × 18 × 15 | 20 × 20 × 15 | 20 × 20 × 16.5 |
| Acquisition matrix | 80 × 80 × 72 | 96 × 96 × 80 | 100 × 100 × 88 | 112 × 112 × 88 | 112 × 112 × 96 |
| SPGR TE/TR (ms) | 5.8/12 | 5.9/12 | 5.4/12 | 5.2/11 | 4.8/10 |
| SPGR Flip angles (degrees) | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16 | 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 13, 18 |
| IR‐SPGR inversion times (ms) | 600, 950 | 600, 900 | 500, 850 | 500, 800 | 450, 750 |
| bSSFP TE/TR (ms) | 5/10 | 5.1/10.2 | 5/10 | 4.4/8.8 | 5/10 |
| bSSFP Flip angles (degrees) | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 |
Figure 3Parameter estimates for functional concurrent regression models. Each column corresponds to a model with a different cognitive response, as indicated at the top, and each row corresponds to a covariate, where the first row shows the effects of the time‐varying covariate white matter MWF and the other rows show the effects of the baseline covariates as age varies. WhiteMatter MWF and BirthWt are scaled to have unit standard deviations to facilitate comparisons. Black solid lines correspond to the regression function estimates, and dark and light gray bands correspond to 50 and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals, respectively. Where these bands do not cover 0 this corresponds to pointwise significant regression effects at the 5% level (colored in red). Significance after adjusting for multiple time points (200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 days) is indicated by red asterisks [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4Time‐varying coefficients of determination R (t) for the fits of functional concurrent regression models E[Y(t)|X(t)] = α(t) + β1(t)X(t), in dependence on age t, where X(t) is the white matter MWF for one of the 23 individual brain regions, and Y(t) is one of the cognitive scores (NVDQ, VDQ, or ELC). The three columns (from left to right) correspond to NVDQ, VDQ, and ELC response, respectively, and the three rows (from top to bottom) correspond to the left brain, the right brain, and the corpus callosum, respectively. Bolded curve segments indicate unadjusted pointwise significance, while “×” signs indicate significant effects after controlling the FDR at the 5% level