| Literature DB >> 31187690 |
Candice Bowling1, Stanton A Glantz2.
Abstract
During the regulatory drafting process, California considered allowing police officers to become licensed owners of cannabis businesses, an action that would have codified a conflict of interest (COI), allowing police to exert influence in two market strata, enforcement and licensure. Up until then, no state specifically excepted law enforcement from COI prohibitions, making California's proposed medical cannabis regulation unique. We performed two 50-state surveys and examined 298 public comments submitted to the Bureau of Cannabis Control during the initial medical cannabis rulemaking process in June 2017. After public comments, the Bureau withdrew this provision. However, that the exception was even considered is cause for concern in this new area of policy development. The progression from proposed medical cannabis rules to emergency rule adoption and now, into proposed final regulations, highlights the value of civic engagement with the rulemaking process. Jurisdictions should adopt bright-line COI rules within their cannabis codes that limit the relationships that law enforcement may have with the private cannabis markets.Entities:
Keywords: Conflict of interest; cannabis legalization; civics; government ethics; law enforcement; policy process
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31187690 PMCID: PMC6823132 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2019.1627444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Psychoactive Drugs ISSN: 0279-1072