Literature DB >> 31187178

The repair of horizontal cleavage tears yields higher complication rates compared to meniscectomy: a systematic review.

Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj1, Tushar Tejpal2, Seper Ekhtiari1, Chetan Gohal1, Nolan Horner3, Beate Hanson3, Moin Khan4, Mohit Bhandari1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus (HCTs) are primarily degenerative in nature, and, however, can be the result of trauma. Such tears account for 12-35% of all tear patterns and can be treated by partial meniscectomy or arthroscopic repair. The purpose of this review was to systematically assess the outcomes and complications for patients undergoing the surgical treatment of HCTs.
METHODS: This review has been conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched from data inception to December 30, 2018 for articles addressing the surgical treatment of HCTs. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies was used to assess study quality. Data are presented descriptively.
RESULTS: Overall, 23 studies were identified, comprising of 702 patients (708 knees) with a mean age of 36.6 ± 9.9 years and a mean follow-up of 33.6 ± 19.6 months. The majority of patients were treated with a partial meniscectomy (59.0%), followed by repair (32.8%) and total meniscectomy (8.2%). Both meniscectomy and repair patients had improvements which surpassed minimal clinically important differences with regard to clinical (e.g. pain, function, daily living) and radiographic outcomes. The overall complication rate was 5.1%, primarily involving patients undergoing meniscal repair (12.9% of all knees undergoing a repair).
CONCLUSION: Although meniscal repair theoretically may provide improvement in biomechanical loading, patients undergoing repair had higher complication rates than those undergoing partial meniscectomy. Clinicians should consider the available implants in determining which tear patterns to repair and future studies with long-term follow-up are needed to investigate complications (e.g. secondary meniscal procedures) as well as the potential for delay in the development of osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Avascular zone; Horizontal cleavage tear; Knee; Meniscus

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31187178     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05557-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  4 in total

1.  Natural history of new horizontal meniscal tears in individuals at risk for and with mild to moderate osteoarthritis: data from osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Magdalena Posadzy; Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Histologic and molecular features in pathologic human menisci from knees with and without osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Farrah A Monibi; Tania Pannellini; Miguel Otero; Russell F Warren; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Favorable Reoperation Rate at 2 Years Following Repair of Horizontal Cleavage Tears Using an All Suture-Based Technique: A Prospective, Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Peter Kurzweil; Aaron J Krych; Adam Anz; F Winston Gwathmey; Gregory Loren; Matthew Lavery; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-13

Review 4.  An Up-to-Date Review of the Meniscus Literature: A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jason B Smoak; John R Matthews; Amrit V Vinod; Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.