Amy A Eyler1, Cheryl Valko1, Natalicio Serrano1. 1. Washington University in St. Louis, Brown School, Prevention Research Center, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Participation in high school athletics is associated with many physical and psychosocial benefits. School budget cuts and increased program costs have resulted in policies requiring student athletes to pay fees for sports participation. The purpose of this study was to explore the implementation and perception of these policies among state and district key informants. METHODS: We conducted an Internet search to compile a list of state and district athletic directors for study recruitment to participate in qualitative interviews. Twelve key informants were interviewed via telephone, digitally audio-recorded, and the conversations transcribed verbatim. Two team members coded transcripts and themes were identified and summarized. RESULTS: The main reasons for implementing fee policies were increasing program costs, revenue loss or decreased school budget, and unsuccessful levy passage. The policies varied in fee structure, and were reported by sport, by athlete, by year, or by family. Participants discussed fee waivers as a strategy to assist athletes unable to pay the sports participation fees. Waivers were most likely linked with federal poverty qualifications. CONCLUSION: The results from these interviews provided insight into sports participation policies in US high schools. More information is needed to explore the consequences of these policies on high school sports participation as well as longer-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Participation in high school athletics is associated with many physical and psychosocial benefits. School budget cuts and increased program costs have resulted in policies requiring student athletes to pay fees for sports participation. The purpose of this study was to explore the implementation and perception of these policies among state and district key informants. METHODS: We conducted an Internet search to compile a list of state and district athletic directors for study recruitment to participate in qualitative interviews. Twelve key informants were interviewed via telephone, digitally audio-recorded, and the conversations transcribed verbatim. Two team members coded transcripts and themes were identified and summarized. RESULTS: The main reasons for implementing fee policies were increasing program costs, revenue loss or decreased school budget, and unsuccessful levy passage. The policies varied in fee structure, and were reported by sport, by athlete, by year, or by family. Participants discussed fee waivers as a strategy to assist athletes unable to pay the sports participation fees. Waivers were most likely linked with federal poverty qualifications. CONCLUSION: The results from these interviews provided insight into sports participation policies in US high schools. More information is needed to explore the consequences of these policies on high school sports participation as well as longer-term outcomes.
Authors: Aristides M Machado-Rodrigues; Manuel J Coelho e Silva; Jorge Mota; Rute Marina Santos; Sean P Cumming; Robert M Malina Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2011-07-29
Authors: Catherine N Rasberry; Sarah M Lee; Leah Robin; B A Laris; Lisa A Russell; Karin K Coyle; Allison J Nihiser Journal: Prev Med Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Rochelle M Eime; Janet A Young; Jack T Harvey; Melanie J Charity; Warren R Payne Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 6.457