Literature DB >> 31186995

A marker-free registration method for standing X-ray panorama reconstruction for hip-knee-ankle axis deformity assessment.

Yehuda K Ben-Zikri1, Ziv R Yaniv2,3, Karl Baum4, Cristian A Linte1,5.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of knee alignment, quantified by the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle (varus-valgus), serves as an essential biomarker in the diagnosis of various orthopaedic conditions and selection of appropriate therapies. Such angular deformities are assessed from standing X-ray panoramas. However, the limited field-of-view of traditional X-ray imaging systems necessitates the acquisition of several sector images to capture an individual's standing posture, and their subsequent 'stitching' to reconstruct a panoramic image. Such panoramas are typically constructed manually by an X-ray imaging technician, often using various external markers attached to the individual's clothing and visible in two adjacent sector images. To eliminate human error, user-induced variability, improve consistency and reproducibility, and reduce the time associated with the traditional manual 'stitching' protocol, here we propose an automatic panorama construction method that only relies on anatomical features reliably detected in the images, eliminating the need for any external markers or manual input from the technician. The method first performs a rough segmentation of the femur and the tibia, then the sector images are registered by evaluating a distance metric between the corresponding bones along their medial edge. The identified translations are then used to generate the standing panorama image. The method was evaluated on 95 patient image datasets from a database of X-ray images acquired across 10 clinical sites as part of the screening process for a multi-site clinical trial. The panorama reconstruction parameters yielded by the proposed method were compared to those used for the manual panorama construction, which served as gold-standard. The horizontal translation differences were 0:43 ± 1:95 mm 0:26 ± 1:43 mm for the femur and tibia respectively, while the vertical translation differences were 3:76 ± 22:35 mm and 1:85 ± 6:79 mm for the femur and tibia, respectively. Our results showed no statistically significant differences between the HKA angles measured using the automated vs. the manually generated panoramas, and also led to similar decisions with regards to the patient inclusion/exclusion in the clinical trial. Thus, the proposed method was shown to provide comparable performance to manual panorama construction, with increased efficiency, consistency and robustness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-limb X-ray; axial deformity at the knee; hip-knee-ankle angle; image registration; panorama reconstruction; segmentation

Year:  2018        PMID: 31186995      PMCID: PMC6559747          DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2018.1537859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis        ISSN: 2168-1163


  17 in total

1.  Long bone panoramas from fluoroscopic X-ray images.

Authors:  Ziv Yaniv; Leo Joskowicz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Parallax-free intra-operative X-ray image stitching.

Authors:  Lejing Wang; Joerg Traub; Simon Weidert; Sandro Michael Heining; Ekkehard Euler; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb. Principles and applications.

Authors:  T D Cooke; R A Scudamore; J T Bryant; C Sorbie; D Siu; B Fisher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

4.  Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement.

Authors:  T Derek V Cooke; Elizabeth A Sled; R Allan Scudamore
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Reliability of the hip-to-ankle radiograph in determining the knee and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eerik T Skyttä; Ville Haapamäki; Mika Koivikko; Heini Huhtala; Ville Remes
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Reliability of lower limb alignment measures using an established landmark-based method with a customized computer software program.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sled; Lisa M Sheehy; David T Felson; Patrick A Costigan; Miu Lam; T Derek V Cooke
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: findings from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; K Douglas Gross; Martin Englund; Leena Sharma; T Derek V Cooke; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Neil Segal; Joyce M Goggins; C Elizabeth Lewis; Charles Eaton; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-02

9.  Intraoperative panoramic image using alignment grid, is it accurate?

Authors:  T Apivatthakakul; M Duanghakrung; S Luevitoonvechkit; S Patumasutra
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Methodologic issues in clinical trials for prevention or risk reduction in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J M Jordan; M F Sowers; S P Messier; J Bradley; G Arangio; J N Katz; E Losina; L Rovati; N Bachtell; C Cooper; T Spector; W Zhang; J Gardiner; M Wahba
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.