| Literature DB >> 31186325 |
Miles C Duncan1, Rebecca K Gillette1, Micah A Maglasang1, Elizabeth A Corn1, Albert K Tai2, David W Lazinski1, Robert M Q Shanks3, Daniel E Kadouri4, Andrew Camilli5.
Abstract
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is a bacterial predator capable of killing and replicating inside most Gram-negative bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Despite growing interest in this organism as a potential therapeutic, many of its genes remain uncharacterized. Here, we perform a high-throughput genetic screen with B. bacteriovorus using transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) to explore the genetic requirements of predation. Two hundred one genes were deemed essential for growth in the absence of prey, whereas over 100 genes were found to be specifically required for predative growth on the human pathogens Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli in both planktonic and biofilm states. To further this work, we created an ordered-knockout library in B. bacteriovorus and developed new high-throughput techniques to characterize the mutants by their stage of deficiency in the predator life cycle. Using microscopy and flow cytometry, we confirmed 10 mutants defective in prey attachment and eight mutants defective in prey rounding. The majority of these genes are hypothetical and previously uncharacterized. Finally, we propose new nomenclature to group B. bacteriovorus mutants into classes based on their stage of predation defect. These results contribute to our basic understanding of bacterial predation and may be useful for harnessing B. bacteriovorus to kill harmful pathogens in the clinical setting.IMPORTANCE Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is a predatory bacterium that can kill a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria, including many human pathogens. Given the global rise of antibiotic resistance and dearth of new antibiotics discovered in the past 30 years, this predator has potential as an alternative to traditional antibiotics. For many years, B. bacteriovorus research was hampered by a lack of genetic tools, and the genetic mechanisms of predation have only recently begun to be established. Here, we comprehensively identify and characterize predator genes required for killing bacterial prey, as well as genes that interfere in this process, which may allow us to design better therapeutic predators. Based on our study, we and other researchers may ultimately be able to genetically engineer strains that have improved killing rates, target specific species of prey, or preferentially target prey in the planktonic or biofilm state.Entities:
Keywords: Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus; Escherichia coli; Tn-seq; Vibrio cholerae; predatory bacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31186325 PMCID: PMC6561027 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01040-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1Identification of B. bacteriovorus mutants with altered fitness in bacterial predation. (A) We generated a complex B. bacteriovorus transposon mutant library and subjected it to transposon insertion sequencing (Tn-seq) before and after expansion on V. cholerae and E. coli. Mutants with decreased fitness (W < 0.1) are shown and categorized according to gene ontology terms. (B) A correlation plot of fitness values for B. bacteriovorus preying on planktonic V. cholerae (VCPL) or E. coli (ECPL) in the full Tn-seq. Each dot represents the fitness values for one gene against the two-prey species on the x and y axes. (C) Diagram of the B. bacteriovorus predatory life cycle. Mutants can show defects in prey attachment (class I), killing (class II), rounding (class III), or exit from prey (class IV). (D) Correlation plots of fitness values comparing results from the full- and mini-Tn-seq screens. (E) E. coli survival following infection with B. bacteriovorus mutants or complemented strains. The average E. coli survival percentage and standard errors of the mean (SEM) for three biological replicates are shown. Significance was determined by comparing E. coli survival against each strain compared to the uninfected (Uninf) control. *, P < 0.001 (ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test).
Proposed classification scheme for B. bacteriovorus mutants
| Class | Activity by predation deficiency | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attach | Kill | Round | Exit | |
| I | ||||
| II | ||||
| III | ||||
| IV | ||||
−, no activity; +, activity.
FIG 2Identification of B. bacteriovorus mutants with attachment defects by Tn-FACSeq. (A) Schematic of the Tn-FACSeq screen. Following a 3-h infection, red fluorescent B. bacteriovorus are sorted into two pools based on whether they associate with green fluorescent V. cholerae or not. In this example, strains A and B do not attach, while strains C and D do. (B) Example gating strategy used to sort B. bacteriovorus by Tn-FACSeq. V.c., V. cholerae; B.b., B. bacteriovorus. (C) Gating strategy for flow cytometry-based validation of attachment-defective mutants identified in Tn-FACSeq. The left panels gate all red events, and the right panels gate all events that are red and green from the same experiment. (D) Quantification of the flow cytometry results in panel C. The average attachment percentage and standard errors of the mean (SEM) for three to four biological replicates are shown. Significance was determined by comparing each strain’s attachment percentage to that of the neutral control. ***, P < 0.001 (ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test).
FIG 3Microscopy validation of Tn-FACSeq results. (A) Fluorescent microscopy images of V. cholerae (cyan) and B. bacteriovorus (magenta) following infection. Scale bar = 10 μm. (B) Quantification of the results in panel A. A minimum of 1,100 B. bacteriovorus cells were scored under each condition, double blind, for attachment to V. cholerae. The average B. bacteriovorus attachment percentage and standard errors of the mean (SEM) for three biological replicates are shown. Significance was determined by comparing each strain’s attachment percentage to that of the neutral control. *, P < 0.0469; **, P < 0.0061; ***, P < 0.0002 (ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test).
FIG 4Identification of B. bacteriovorus mutants with defects in prey rounding by Tn-SphereSeq. (A) Microscopy images of attack-phase B. bacteriovorus and E. coli bdelloplasts isolated by differential centrifugation for Tn-SphereSeq. Arrows indicate bdelloplasts. (B) Fluorescence images of GFP-expressing V. cholerae 3 h following infection with B. bacteriovorus at an MOI of 1. Arrows indicate bdelloplasts. Scale bar = 10 μm. (C) The percentage of rounded V. cholerae cells was calculated by analyzing images by Matlab for roundness (eccentricity) of three biological replicates. Significance was determined by comparing each strain’s rounding percentage to that of the neutral control. *, P < 0.0001 (ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test).
Classification and data summary for tested B. bacteriovorus mutants
| Gene | Protein | NCBI function | Activity by predation deficiency | Class | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attach | Kill | Round | ||||
| Bd0075 | hypo | Unknown | ND | 1 | ||
| Bd0150 | hypo | Unknown | 1 | |||
| Bd0161 | hypo | Unknown | 1 | |||
| Bd0470 | TadC | Type IVb pilus | 1 | |||
| Bd0474 | hypo | Unknown | 2 | |||
| Bd0739 | hypo | Unknown | 1 | |||
| Bd0838 | AglS | Adventurous gliding motility | 1 | |||
| Bd2210 | hypo | Unknown | 1 | |||
| Bd2490 | hypo | Unknown | ND | 1 | ||
| Bd2684 | hypo | Unknown | ND | 1 | ||
| Bd3852 | PilT | Type IVa pilus | 1 | |||
hypo, hypothetical.
−, no activity; +, activity; ND, not determined.