| Literature DB >> 31185680 |
Qingyu Pu1, Jin Liang2, Qinqin Shen3, Jingye Fu4, Zhien Pu5, Jiang Liu6, Xuegui Wang7, Qiang Wang.
Abstract
Terpenoids play important roles in plant defense. Although some terpene synthases have been characterized, terpenoids and their biosynthesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) still remain largely unknown. Here, we describe the identification of a terpene synthase gene in wheat. It encodes a sesquiterpene synthase that catalyzes β-patchoulene formation with E,E-farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) as the substrate, thus named as TaPS. TaPS exhibits inducible expression in wheat in response to various elicitations. Particularly, alamethicin treatment strongly induces TaPS gene expression and β-patchoulene accumulation in wheat. Overexpression of TaPS in Arabidopsis successfully produces β-patchoulene, verifying the biochemical function of TaPS in planta. Furthermore, these transgenic Arabidopsis plants exhibit resistance against herbivory by repelling beet armyworm larvae feeding, thereby indicating anti-herbivory activity of β-patchoulene. The catalytic mechanism of TaPS is also explored by homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis. Two key amino acids are identified to act in protonation and stability of intermediates and product formation. Taken together, one wheat sesquiterpene synthase is identified as β-patchoulene synthase. TaPS exhibits inducible gene expression and the sesquiterpene β-patchoulene is involved in repelling insect infestation.Entities:
Keywords: arabidopsis; herbivory; patchoulene; resistance; sesquiterpene; wheat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31185680 PMCID: PMC6628343 DOI: 10.3390/genes10060441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Wheat β-patchoulene synthase (TaPS) catalyzed β-patchoulene formation. (A) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) chromatogram of extract from the culture co-overexpressing TaPS and farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) synthase in E. coli. The empty vector (EV) control was also shown. The product β-patchoulene was labeled as peak 1 and the chemical structure was shown as well. (B) Mass spectrum of peak 1. The calculated retention index (RI) was shown.
Figure 2Inducible gene expression of TaPS and β-patchoulene accumulation in wheat. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of TaPS in wheat treated with various elicitations including UV irradiation, 50 μM methyl jasmonate (MeJA), 5 mg/L alamethicin, pathogen infection with F. graminearum spore inoculation or herbivory with beet armyworm larvae feeding. Untreated wheat leaves were used as the control. Relative gene expression level of TaPS in roots and stems were also shown. Gene expression of TaPS was normalized with wheat Actin, the endogenous control gene. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (Tukey HSD test, p < 0.05). (B) GC-MS chromatograms of wheat leaf extracts with alamethicin treatment (ALA). CK is the control wheat leaves without any treatments. The induced β-patchoulene and three other sesquiterpenes (peak 1–3) were labeled. Mass spectra and putative identification of peak 1–3 were shown in Figure S2. IS indicates the internal standard.
Figure 3Overexpression of TaPS in Arabidopsis. (A) RT-PCR analysis of TaPS gene expression in transgenic Arabidopsis. Actin was used as the control gene; (B) GC-MS analysis of β-patchoulene production in two transgenic Arabidopsis lines (TaPS-OE#2 and #5). IS indicates the internal standard; (C) head space volatile analysis by GC-MS for TaPS transgenic Arabidopsis plants.
Figure 4Dual choice assays. (A) Arabidopsis leaves fed by beet armyworm larvae for 24 h. Seven pieces of leaves for wild type (WT) or overexpression lines (TaPS-OE) were placed on the opposite side of the same plate. Five larvae were placed at the middle line in each plate. Two independent lines (TaPS-OE#2 and #5) were used for assays; (B) leaf consumption of beet armyworm larvae on WT and transgenic Arabidopsis leaves. The consumed leaf area (cm2) was calculated based on leaf images before and after feeding with analysis by Image J. The lowercase letters indicate significant difference (Tukey HSD test, p < 0.05). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).
Figure 5Homology modeling of TaPS and site-directed mutagenesis analysis. (A) Catalytic cavity of TaPS was predicted based on homology modeling with docking of the final product β-patchoulene (red). Two key aspartates in the conserved DDXXD motif of terpene synthases were shown in blue. The two unique residues in TaPS, I392 and C393 were shown in yellow and green, respectively. The predicted distances between I392 or C393 and C2 of β-patchoulene were labeled as well (3.3 Å and 3.8 Å, respectively); (B) amino acid alignment of TaPS and patchoulol synthase (PatTPS177). The unique I392 and C393 were indicated by the red line. The full alignment was shown in Figure S4; (C) GC-MS chromatograms of TaPS:I392C and C393G with FPP as the substrate. The new products were labeled as peak 1–10 and their mass spectra were listed in Figure S5. The authentic (−)-patchoulol was injected for comparison.