Literature DB >> 31185324

Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi-Quan Xiong1, Jing Tan2, Yan-Mei Liu2, Yong-Zhi Li3, Fang-Fei You3, Min-Yi Zhang3, Qing Chen3, Kang Zou2, Xin Sun4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in men and a considerable disease burden globally. Multiple studies have focused on the accuracy of optical coherence tomography for bladder cancer diagnosis; however, the findings are inconsistent. Here, we assessed the accuracy of optical coherence tomography for bladder cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Embase, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database were searched for relevant studies from the earliest date available through March 11, 2019. Studies evaluating the accuracy of optical coherence tomography bladder cancer diagnosis were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values of weighted symmetric summary receiver operating curves, were calculated at the per-lesion level.
RESULTS: Eleven studies, with a total of 1933 lesions, were included in the final analysis. The pooled results indicated that optical coherence tomography can differentiate bladder cancer from benign lesions: sensitivity, 94.9% (95% confidence interval: 92.7%-96.6%); specificity, 84.6% (95% confidence interval: 82.6%-86.4%); area under the curve, 0.97. Moreover, compared with optical coherence tomography alone, combined optical coherence tomography and fluorescence cystoscopy increased the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 94.3% vs. 87.3%; specificity, 89.2% vs. 73.9%). Cross-polarization optical coherence tomography could also distinguish bladder cancer from normal tissue: sensitivity, 92.0% (95% confidence interval: 87.0%-95.6%); specificity, 84.4% (95% confidence interval: 81.7%-86.9%); area under the curve, 0.95.
CONCLUSIONS: Optical coherence tomography can accurately differentiate malignant from benign bladder lesions, particularly when combined with fluorescence cystoscopy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Diagnosis accuracy; Fluorescence cystoscopy; Meta-analysis; Optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31185324     DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


  4 in total

1.  En-face polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography to characterize early-stage esophageal cancer and determine tumor margin.

Authors:  Ping-Hsien Chen; Hiu-Ki Lai; Yi-Chen Yeh; Kuo-Wei Chang; Ming-Chih Hou; Wen-Chuan Kuo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 2.  Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Xinzi Hu; Guangzhi Li; Song Wu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Ex-vivo evaluation of miniaturized probes for endoscopic optical coherence tomography in urothelial cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Dominik Stefan Schoeb; Carolin Wollensak; Simon Kretschmer; Gerardo González-Cerdas; Caglar Ataman; Gian Kayser; Franz Friedrich Dressler; Christian Gratzke; Hans Zappe; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  CD47-targeted optical molecular imaging and near-infrared photoimmunotherapy in the detection and treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yongjun Yang; Xiaoting Yan; Jiawei Li; Chao Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 7.200

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.