To the editor,Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. The incidence increases above 50 years. Although prostate cancer is observed in more than 80% of males over 80 years of age, most patients have a slow course and no clinical symptoms. As with all malignancies, early diagnosis is important in prostate cancer. The most important diagnostic methods used in prostate cancer are digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and PSA. The definitive diagnosis is made by histopathology. Nowadays, it is diagnosed at localized stage (1-4).The correct staging of the disease after the diagnosis of prostate cancer is very important in terms of the effectiveness and prognosis of treatment planning. In the staging, thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography (CT), pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), bone scintigraphy (TVKS), NaF-PET / CT imaging and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT imaging, which are currently used as a new diagnostic method, are used. Fluorine-18 (2-fluoro-2-deoxy D-glucose) used in 18F-FDG PET / CT is generally not used in staging because of its low or no involvement in prostate cancer (1-3).Although the role of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in the management of prostate cancer has not yet taken place in the international guidelines, in the recent studies 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT staging, treatment plan determination, suspicion of recurrence or biochemical recurrence in the presence of existing lesions has a significant contribution to the evaluation of the response to treatment with high diagnostic accuracy. PSMA is a type II transmembrane protein which increases expression in prostate cancer cells. This can be accurately detected in prostate cancer cells by 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT examination. However, since 5% of patients with prostate cancer may not have PSMA expression, a false negative result can be obtained with 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT examination (3-6). In the study performed by Eiber et al., the PSA value of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was 2ng / dl or above, 96,8%, 93% between 1-2, 72% between 0,5-1 and 0,2-0,5. 57.9% of the patients had diagnostic accuracy. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was reported to have high diagnostic accuracy in lesion detection even at low PSA (less than 0.5) (2). Maurer et al. compared the mid-high-risk group with 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and conventional radiological imaging (CT or MRI) in nodal smear diagnosed with prostate cancer (130 patients). According to the data obtained, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT were 65.9%, 98.9% and 88.5%, respectively, whereas these rates were 43.9%, 85.4% and 72.3%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was reported to be higher in nodal staging (3). Pyka et al. reported that 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was more sensitive and specific in demonstrating bone metastasis in a study of 68 patients with prostate cancer compared with TVKS findings and 6 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT findings (4).Both primary and definite radiotherapy (RT) can change the target area in salvage RT. Schmidt-Hegemann et al. examined the reliability of the 68Ga-PSMA-PET / CT, the treatment plan in many patients; both primary definitive RT and salvage can change the target area in RT. Compared with conventional CT, 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT reported a significant effect on the radiotherapeutic approach, especially in postoperativepatients (5). In a prospective study, Roach et al. evaluated 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT images for restaging because of suspicion of recurrence or biochemical recurrence in the middle and high risk group. They found that 51% of the patients’ treatment plan changed when they evaluated the treatment plan with before and after the treatment plan. This rate was found to be 21% for primary staging. As a result, 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT reported higher sensitivity in detecting biochemical recurrence (6). In another study, 68Ga-PSMA-PET / CT and CT were compared in patients with salvage radiotherapy. It has been reported that 28.6% more pathological involvement is detected in 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT , CT, and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT has been reported to be more useful in determining RT volume and indication (7). Zamboglou et al. compared 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT with MRI for the detection of gross tumor volume (GTV) in primary prostate cancer. It was reported that 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT may play an important role in focal radiation planning in lesions (8).As a result, 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT is a more frequently used test because of its high specificity and sensitivity in detecting recurrent lesion and localization even in low PSA levels. In addition, the metabolic activity of the primary site and the local area in the patient with staging as well as the RT plan provides valuable advantages about the width of the RT area. According to all the findings, prospective studies are needed to determine the role and importance of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in RT plan in prostate cancer.Yours Sincerely,Author
Authors: Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Chukwuka Eze; Minglun Li; Paul Rogowski; Christian Schaefer; Christian Stief; Alexander Buchner; Constantinos Zamboglou; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ute Ganswindt; Clemens Cyran; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Harun Ilhan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Pim J van Leeuwen; Phillip Stricker; George Hruby; Andrew Kneebone; Francis Ting; Ben Thompson; Quoc Nguyen; Bao Ho; Louise Emmett Journal: BJU Int Date: 2016-01-24 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Matthias Eiber; Tobias Maurer; Michael Souvatzoglou; Ambros J Beer; Alexander Ruffani; Bernhard Haller; Frank-Philipp Graner; Hubert Kübler; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael Eisenhut; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paul J Roach; Roslyn Francis; Louise Emmett; Edward Hsiao; Andrew Kneebone; George Hruby; Thomas Eade; Quoc A Nguyen; Benjamin D Thompson; Thomas Cusick; Michael McCarthy; Colin Tang; Bao Ho; Philip D Stricker; Andrew M Scott Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Constantinos Zamboglou; Gesche Wieser; Steffen Hennies; Irene Rempel; Simon Kirste; Martin Soschynski; Hans Christian Rischke; Tobias Fechter; Cordula A Jilg; Mathias Langer; Philipp T Meyer; Michael Bock; Anca-Ligia Grosu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 9.236