Literature DB >> 31184205

East Anglian early Neolithic monument burial linked to contemporary Megaliths.

Christiana L Scheib1,2, Ruoyun Hui2, Eugenia D'Atanasio3, Anthony Wilder Wohns4, Sarah A Inskip2, Alice Rose2, Craig Cessford2,5, Tamsin C O'Connell6, John E Robb6, Christopher Evans5, Ricky Patten5, Toomas Kivisild1,2,3.   

Abstract

In the fourth millennium BCE a cultural phenomenon of monumental burial structures spread along the Atlantic façade. Megalithic burials have been targeted for aDNA analyses, but a gap remains in East Anglia, where Neolithic structures were generally earthen or timber. An early Neolithic (3762-3648 cal. BCE) burial monument at the site of Trumpington Meadows, Cambridgeshire, UK, contained the partially articulated remains of at least three individuals. To determine whether this monument fits a pattern present in megalithic burials regarding sex bias, kinship, diet and relationship to modern populations, teeth and ribs were analysed for DNA and carbon and nitrogen isotopic values, respectively. Whole ancient genomes were sequenced from two individuals to a mean genomic coverage of 1.6 and 1.2X and genotypes imputed. Results show that they were brothers from a small population genetically and isotopically similar to previously published British Neolithic individuals, with a level of genome-wide homozygosity consistent with a small island population sourced from continental Europe, but bearing no signs of recent inbreeding. The first Neolithic whole genomes from a monumental burial in East Anglia confirm that this region was connected with the larger pattern of Neolithic megaliths in the British Isles and the Atlantic façade.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancient DNA; Britain; isotope analysis; kinship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31184205      PMCID: PMC6816495          DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1623912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


Introduction

Recent archaeogenomic research has mainly focused on the broad genetic affinities of British Mesolithic (n = 6), Neolithic (n = 83) and Bronze Age (n = 67) people and population turnover coinciding with material culture change (Olalde et al. 2018; Brace et al. 2019), with one study focusing on the connections within and between megalithic burials along the Atlantic façade (Sanchez-Quinto et al. 2019). To date, Neolithic sites from the easternmost section of southern Britain (East Anglia) remain uncharacterised (Figure 1A). At the site of Trumpington Meadows, Cambridgeshire, two adjacent, broadly contemporary monuments, erected as early as 3762–3648 cal. BCE and modified through the Early Bronze Age (EBA), were excavated revealing an internment of at least three partially articulated and disarticulated older middle/mature adult males in Monument I (Figure 1B) (Evans et al. 2018). Two of the individuals, Sk.4/799 and Sk.1/880, were buried in close association at the south end of the burial chamber with a third disarticulated Sk.3/800 overlying Sk.1/880 that may be the same individual, while another, Sk.2/801, lay apart from them at the north end. Skeleton 4/799 was associated with a leaf-shaped arrowhead, which could suggest his death through violence (Evans et al. 2018). All individuals were directly radiocarbon dated (Table 1), suggesting usage of the burial chamber over 50–75 years (Evans et al. 2018).
Figure 1.

(A) Location and numbers of sequenced individuals from Neolithic contexts in the UK. Trumpington Meadows is marked in red, other published data is black, the number represents the number of genomes from the site. (B) Site layout of burial in Monument I with photograph (modified with permission from Evans et al. (2018)).

Table 1.

Archaeological information, mtDNA, Y chromosome, genetic sex and kinship of the samples in the study.

Skeleton14C DateSex
AgeMT hgY hgKinshipSource
 Morph.Gen.
Sk.4/7994712 ± 24ndXYOlder Middle AdultK1a + 195I2d-Y3709 / I2a2a1st Degree of 880This study
Sk.1/8804921 ± 24MaleXYMiddle/Mature AdultK1a + 195I2d-Y3709 / I2a2a1st Degree of 799This study
Sk.3/8004847 ± 24MalendMature AdultndndndEvans et al. (2018)
Sk.2/8014886 ± 25MalendOlder Middle/Mature AdultndndndEvans et al. (2018)

All dates are 14C dates uncalibrated.

MT hg, mitochondrial DNA haplogroup; Y hg, Y chromosome haplogroup.

(A) Location and numbers of sequenced individuals from Neolithic contexts in the UK. Trumpington Meadows is marked in red, other published data is black, the number represents the number of genomes from the site. (B) Site layout of burial in Monument I with photograph (modified with permission from Evans et al. (2018)). Archaeological information, mtDNA, Y chromosome, genetic sex and kinship of the samples in the study. All dates are 14C dates uncalibrated. MT hg, mitochondrial DNA haplogroup; Y hg, Y chromosome haplogroup.

Subjects and methods

Three individuals were sampled from the available skeletal elements with petrous bone preferred if available: Sk.2/801 (petrous bone), Sk.1/880 (tooth) and Sk.4/799 (tooth). Sk.3/800 lacked teeth and petrous bone and is likely the same individual as Sk.1/880, thus was not sampled at this time. Ancient DNA (aDNA) was successfully extracted in a dedicated facility (see Supplementary material) from the teeth while the extract from the petrous bone failed to amplify. Extracts were built into double-stranded, single-indexed libraries and were shotgun-sequenced on Illumina NextSeq500 using the single-end 75 base pair kit. For details on analysis pipelines and software, see Supplementary materials. Carbon and nitrogen isotopic values were measured on bone collagen extracted from the ribs of both Sk.4/799 and Sk.1/880, as well as the individual Sk.2/801, using continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (Table 2) (see Supplementary material).
Table 2.

Isotopic information from skeletons of Monument I.

SkeletonSample labelElement sampledδ13C (‰)δ15N (‰)%C%NC/N ratio
Sk.2/801TRM10_243_RRib−20.910.539.614.83.1
Sk.2/880TRM10_294_RRib−21.010.134.212.63.2
Sk.2/799TRM10_248_RRib−20.810.138.714.43.1
Isotopic information from skeletons of Monument I.

Results

Data quality and authenticity

The endogenous human DNA content for Sk.1/880 and Sk.4/799 was 38.4 and 55.8%, respectively, both individuals yielded full mitochondrial (134–140X) and nuclear DNA (1.3–1.9X) including the Y chromosome (0.27–0.40X) (Table S2). Both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA contamination estimates are low (0.40–1.22% and 0.73–0.89%, respectively, Table S2) and both libraries show damage patterns of on average 48–52% C > T deamination in the first 5 bp from the 5’ ends (Table S3). Collagen was successfully extracted from the ribs and analysed. Quality criteria (C/N ratio, %C, %N) show that the collagen was well-preserved (see Supplementary material).

Relationship of the ancient individuals to each other

The mitochondrial (K1a + 195) (Table S4) and Y chromosome (I2d-Y3709 or I2a2a) (Table S5) haplotypes were identical, indicating both a maternal and paternal relationship. To investigate with higher resolution, we ran READ (Kuhn et al. 2018) on the autosomal data of these two samples together with 68 (Sanchez-Quinto et al. 2019) published Neolithic samples (Olalde et al. 2018) and detected a first degree relationship between the two Trumpington samples (Table S6). To distinguish between a father–son and full-sibling relationship, genotypes were imputed using the 1000 Genomes Project European reference panel (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. 2015) and genetic relatedness coefficients calculated in PLINK (Chang et al. 2015) (see Supplementary material). Sk.4/799 and Sk.1/880 are identical by descent (IBD) for one haplotype across 48% of their genome and share IBD for both haplotypes across 33.7% of the genome, which is consistent with a full sibling relationship (Table S7). The radiocarbon determinations indicate that Skeleton 1 probably died before Skeleton 4 and, given their relative ages at death, Skeleton 1 was almost certainly the older sibling. To explore the size of the Trumpington Meadows Neolithic population and to test for inbreeding in the parents or grandparents of the siblings, we estimated the lengths of the runs of homozygosity (ROH) in PLINK (Chang et al. 2015) using parameter settings described previously (Gamba et al. 2014). Total ROH lengths were higher than 150 MB in both brothers, which is relatively high compared to the range of 70–135 MB in Neolithic genomes from Hungary (Gamba et al. 2014) and observed averages of 105–125 MB in present-day European populations (Table S8, Figure S1). Since we do not observe very long ROH tracts, > 10 MB, in either brother, it is more likely that the high levels of their genomic homozygosity can be explained by their small effective population size, rather than by recent inbreeding in their family. Interestingly the brothers differ from each other in that Sk.1/880 carries two medium-sized segments (∼6 MB), while Sk.4/799 carries none longer than 5 MB. Carrying >5 MB segments is not unusual among modern Europeans: within a pool of 503 modern Europeans studied by the 1KGP, 67 (13.3%) had at least one >5 MB ROH segment, with six (6.8%) of the GBR genomes carrying higher total ROH tract lengths than Sk.1/880 (Table S7).

Relationship of the ancient individuals to other ancient and modern populations

The Y chromosome haplotype I2d-Y3709 or I2a2a (ISOGG) has a modern distribution, mainly in the UK and Ireland (https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-Y3709). All previously published Neolithic British males had I2 haplotypes and three Scottish males had I2d-Y3709 (Karmin et al. 2015; Olalde et al. 2018; Sanchez-Quinto et al. 2019). Haploid genotype calls at 1,233,013 SNPs of the ‘1240 capture’ array (Mathieson et al. 2015) were made in ANGSD (Korneliussen et al. 2014) for both Trumpington individuals (TRM10) and merged with previously published Neolithic British samples (with coverage of >10% SNPs) and modern European genomes from the Human Origins dataset (see Supplementary material), obtaining ∼500k overlapping autosomal SNPs for principal component analysis (PCA). Both individuals cluster together with previously published Neolithic individuals from Britain, Iberia, and Sweden, as well as beaker-associated individuals from Iberia (Olalde et al. 2018) (Figure 2A). F4 statistics in the form of (TestPop1,TestPop2;TRM10,Mbuti.DG) were used to determine any excess allele sharing between TRM10 and other populations. The brothers share excess alleles (Z > 3) with Neolithic individuals from the British Isles, France and Iberia when compared to Central European Neolithic individuals, and to Iberian Bell Beaker individuals when compared to English Bronze Age populations (Table S9).
Figure 2.

(A) Principal component analysis of ancient samples from Olalde et al. (2018), Brace et al. (2019), and Sanchez-Quinto et al. (2019) projected onto modern variation from 1 KGP (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. 2015). (B) Genomic descent from the Trumpington samples in the Thousand Genomes Project. Bar height indicates the relative proportion of genomic material in the named population, which is inferred to copy directly from the haplotypes present in Sk.4/799 (left side of each bar) and Sk.1/880 (right side of each bar). Colours give the contribution from each chromosome, relative to chromosome size, to indicate if the pattern differs for different chromosomes. Populations are sorted by super population and decreasing values of the genomic descent statistic (averaged between Sk.4/799 and Sk.1/880). See Supplementary methods for a full description of the genomic descent statistic.

To infer descent from the Trumpington haplotypes within the 1KGP, phased and imputed ancient genomes were made available as potential ancestors of modern samples using tsinfer, a newly-developed method for inferring full gene genealogies (Kelleher et al. 2018) (see Supplementary material). We report the relative proportion of the aggregated genetic material of each 1KGP population which ‘copies’ or putatively descends from the Trumpington samples (Figure 2B). Among the 1 KGP super-populations, the greatest amount of genetic material derived from Trumpington haplotypes is found in European populations, followed by admixed American populations. Iberians (IBS) show the greatest amount of genetic material attributable to the Trumpington haplotypes, consistent with recent findings (Olalde et al. 2018). (A) Principal component analysis of ancient samples from Olalde et al. (2018), Brace et al. (2019), and Sanchez-Quinto et al. (2019) projected onto modern variation from 1 KGP (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. 2015). (B) Genomic descent from the Trumpington samples in the Thousand Genomes Project. Bar height indicates the relative proportion of genomic material in the named population, which is inferred to copy directly from the haplotypes present in Sk.4/799 (left side of each bar) and Sk.1/880 (right side of each bar). Colours give the contribution from each chromosome, relative to chromosome size, to indicate if the pattern differs for different chromosomes. Populations are sorted by super population and decreasing values of the genomic descent statistic (averaged between Sk.4/799 and Sk.1/880). See Supplementary methods for a full description of the genomic descent statistic.

Phenotypic and isotopic analysis

Hair, eye and skin colour were predicted using 41 variants in the Hirisplex-S (Chaitanya et al. 2018) (see Supplementary methods). Both brothers have alleles with a predicted phenotype of brown eyes, brown/dark brown hair and intermediate skin; however, they are not identical, with Sk.1/880 predicted to have slightly darker skin pigmentation than his brother (Table S10). Like the majority of the British Neolithic individuals (Olalde et al. 2018), both brothers are homozygous (AA) for the light skin allele (rs1426654 G > A; minor allele A) of the SLC24A5 gene which is associated with the Anatolian Farmer ancestry (Mathieson et al. 2015); however, they are both heterozygous (GC) for the rs16891982 C > G (minor allele C) SNP in SLC45A2 which showed a dramatic allele frequency increase from 25% in Neolithic to ∼ 70% in Bronze Age Britain after the arrival of the Steppe Ancestry associated with Bell Beaker culture (Olalde et al. 2018). Like other Neolithic individuals, both brothers lack the derived lactase persistence allele (rs4988235 G > A in MCM6; minor allele A). As genetic predisposition and actual diet practices are not intrinsically aligned, carbon and nitrogen isotopic values were measured on the rib bone collagen of the brothers as well as the additional male (Sk. 2/802) interned in the feature to estimate dietary intake. The range of δ13C and δ15N values is small, with δ13C values between −20.8‰ and −21.0‰ and δ15N values between 10.1‰ and 10.5‰. Sk.4/799 and Sk.1/880 have identical δ15N values. Sk.2/802 has slightly higher δ15N values than the brothers, but this is unlikely to be biologically meaningful in this context. These results are consistent with a terrestrial C3 diet, with a small contribution of animal protein, but little or no marine protein, although, without contemporary faunal isotopic data, this is harder to quantify. The isotopic similarity of the three individuals indicates that they consumed a similar diet, isotopically and most probably compositionally, particularly regarding access to animal proteins. It is not possible to differentiate between types, e.g. meat, dairy, eggs, from isotopic analysis alone, thus additional proteomics or DNA analysis of calculus could be beneficial. These results currently represent the only isotopic data from Neolithic human skeletons in Cambridgeshire, although δ13C and δ15N values are broadly similar to several other isotopic studies of Neolithic material from the south of the UK, both in absolute terms and as regards the restricted variation within the group (e.g. Stevens et al. 2012).

Discussion

The Trumpington monument is an example of a Long Barrow or Chambered Tomb tradition. While further east than the previously described megalithic burials from the British Isles, it fits within a number of previously observed patterns generic for the monumental burial tradition of the fourth millennium BCE. First, bone collagen carbon and nitrogen isotopic values indicate a terrestrial diet rather than exploitation of marine resources found in British Mesolithic hunter-gatherers (Richards et al. 2003) and show that the three interned individuals shared a similar diet. Second, individuals buried within the Megaliths and in the Trumpington Long Barrow monument all share a genetic affinity to Iberian/Atlantic Façade populations, being more distant to the central European Neolithic individuals (Lazaridis et al. 2014; Olalde et al. 2018) and to later Bell Beaker individuals buried within the same site (Olalde et al. 2018). Third, they share phenotypic alleles similar to Anatolian farmers (Lazaridis et al. 2014) and the burials have a higher proportion of males interred with evidence of close kinship ties within and among the monumental burials (Sanchez-Quinto et al. 2019). The ubiquity of the I2d-Y3709/I2a2a Y chromosome haplogroup in Neolithic British Isles individuals, while mtDNA shows more diversity, supports a sex-biased founder effect in the monumental burial tradition. The population from which these brothers came was smaller than previously studied continental European Neolithic populations, but did not carry marks of recent inbreeding. Further analysis of additional individuals from the monument including palaeopathology, aDNA from bones and dental calculus and/or proteomics could inform on remaining questions regarding the genetic relationship among the other interred individuals, dietary exploitation in Neolithic East Anglia and the presence of and manifestations of disease during this time period.
  13 in total

1.  The HIrisPlex-S system for eye, hair and skin colour prediction from DNA: Introduction and forensic developmental validation.

Authors:  Lakshmi Chaitanya; Krystal Breslin; Sofia Zuñiga; Laura Wirken; Ewelina Pośpiech; Magdalena Kukla-Bartoszek; Titia Sijen; Peter de Knijff; Fan Liu; Wojciech Branicki; Manfred Kayser; Susan Walsh
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.882

2.  Ancient genomes indicate population replacement in Early Neolithic Britain.

Authors:  Selina Brace; Yoan Diekmann; Thomas J Booth; Lucy van Dorp; Zuzana Faltyskova; Nadin Rohland; Swapan Mallick; Iñigo Olalde; Matthew Ferry; Megan Michel; Jonas Oppenheimer; Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht; Kristin Stewardson; Rui Martiniano; Susan Walsh; Manfred Kayser; Sophy Charlton; Garrett Hellenthal; Ian Armit; Rick Schulting; Oliver E Craig; Alison Sheridan; Mike Parker Pearson; Chris Stringer; David Reich; Mark G Thomas; Ian Barnes
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.

Authors:  Christopher C Chang; Carson C Chow; Laurent Cam Tellier; Shashaank Vattikuti; Shaun M Purcell; James J Lee
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.524

4.  Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans.

Authors:  Iosif Lazaridis; Nick Patterson; Alissa Mittnik; Gabriel Renaud; Swapan Mallick; Karola Kirsanow; Peter H Sudmant; Joshua G Schraiber; Sergi Castellano; Mark Lipson; Bonnie Berger; Christos Economou; Ruth Bollongino; Qiaomei Fu; Kirsten I Bos; Susanne Nordenfelt; Heng Li; Cesare de Filippo; Kay Prüfer; Susanna Sawyer; Cosimo Posth; Wolfgang Haak; Fredrik Hallgren; Elin Fornander; Nadin Rohland; Dominique Delsate; Michael Francken; Jean-Michel Guinet; Joachim Wahl; George Ayodo; Hamza A Babiker; Graciela Bailliet; Elena Balanovska; Oleg Balanovsky; Ramiro Barrantes; Gabriel Bedoya; Haim Ben-Ami; Judit Bene; Fouad Berrada; Claudio M Bravi; Francesca Brisighelli; George B J Busby; Francesco Cali; Mikhail Churnosov; David E C Cole; Daniel Corach; Larissa Damba; George van Driem; Stanislav Dryomov; Jean-Michel Dugoujon; Sardana A Fedorova; Irene Gallego Romero; Marina Gubina; Michael Hammer; Brenna M Henn; Tor Hervig; Ugur Hodoglugil; Aashish R Jha; Sena Karachanak-Yankova; Rita Khusainova; Elza Khusnutdinova; Rick Kittles; Toomas Kivisild; William Klitz; Vaidutis Kučinskas; Alena Kushniarevich; Leila Laredj; Sergey Litvinov; Theologos Loukidis; Robert W Mahley; Béla Melegh; Ene Metspalu; Julio Molina; Joanna Mountain; Klemetti Näkkäläjärvi; Desislava Nesheva; Thomas Nyambo; Ludmila Osipova; Jüri Parik; Fedor Platonov; Olga Posukh; Valentino Romano; Francisco Rothhammer; Igor Rudan; Ruslan Ruizbakiev; Hovhannes Sahakyan; Antti Sajantila; Antonio Salas; Elena B Starikovskaya; Ayele Tarekegn; Draga Toncheva; Shahlo Turdikulova; Ingrida Uktveryte; Olga Utevska; René Vasquez; Mercedes Villena; Mikhail Voevoda; Cheryl A Winkler; Levon Yepiskoposyan; Pierre Zalloua; Tatijana Zemunik; Alan Cooper; Cristian Capelli; Mark G Thomas; Andres Ruiz-Linares; Sarah A Tishkoff; Lalji Singh; Kumarasamy Thangaraj; Richard Villems; David Comas; Rem Sukernik; Mait Metspalu; Matthias Meyer; Evan E Eichler; Joachim Burger; Montgomery Slatkin; Svante Pääbo; Janet Kelso; David Reich; Johannes Krause
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory.

Authors:  Cristina Gamba; Eppie R Jones; Matthew D Teasdale; Russell L McLaughlin; Gloria Gonzalez-Fortes; Valeria Mattiangeli; László Domboróczki; Ivett Kővári; Ildikó Pap; Alexandra Anders; Alasdair Whittle; János Dani; Pál Raczky; Thomas F G Higham; Michael Hofreiter; Daniel G Bradley; Ron Pinhasi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture.

Authors:  Monika Karmin; Lauri Saag; Mário Vicente; Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Mari Järve; Ulvi Gerst Talas; Siiri Rootsi; Anne-Mai Ilumäe; Reedik Mägi; Mario Mitt; Luca Pagani; Tarmo Puurand; Zuzana Faltyskova; Florian Clemente; Alexia Cardona; Ene Metspalu; Hovhannes Sahakyan; Bayazit Yunusbayev; Georgi Hudjashov; Michael DeGiorgio; Eva-Liis Loogväli; Christina Eichstaedt; Mikk Eelmets; Gyaneshwer Chaubey; Kristiina Tambets; Sergei Litvinov; Maru Mormina; Yali Xue; Qasim Ayub; Grigor Zoraqi; Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen; Farida Akhatova; Joseph Lachance; Sarah Tishkoff; Kuvat Momynaliev; François-Xavier Ricaut; Pradiptajati Kusuma; Harilanto Razafindrazaka; Denis Pierron; Murray P Cox; Gazi Nurun Nahar Sultana; Rane Willerslev; Craig Muller; Michael Westaway; David Lambert; Vedrana Skaro; Lejla Kovačevic; Shahlo Turdikulova; Dilbar Dalimova; Rita Khusainova; Natalya Trofimova; Vita Akhmetova; Irina Khidiyatova; Daria V Lichman; Jainagul Isakova; Elvira Pocheshkhova; Zhaxylyk Sabitov; Nikolay A Barashkov; Pagbajabyn Nymadawa; Evelin Mihailov; Joseph Wee Tien Seng; Irina Evseeva; Andrea Bamberg Migliano; Syafiq Abdullah; George Andriadze; Dragan Primorac; Lubov Atramentova; Olga Utevska; Levon Yepiskoposyan; Damir Marjanovic; Alena Kushniarevich; Doron M Behar; Christian Gilissen; Lisenka Vissers; Joris A Veltman; Elena Balanovska; Miroslava Derenko; Boris Malyarchuk; Andres Metspalu; Sardana Fedorova; Anders Eriksson; Andrea Manica; Fernando L Mendez; Tatiana M Karafet; Krishna R Veeramah; Neil Bradman; Michael F Hammer; Ludmila P Osipova; Oleg Balanovsky; Elza K Khusnutdinova; Knut Johnsen; Maido Remm; Mark G Thomas; Chris Tyler-Smith; Peter A Underhill; Eske Willerslev; Rasmus Nielsen; Mait Metspalu; Richard Villems; Toomas Kivisild
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A global reference for human genetic variation.

Authors:  Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe.

Authors:  Iñigo Olalde; Selina Brace; Morten E Allentoft; Ian Armit; Kristian Kristiansen; Thomas Booth; Nadin Rohland; Swapan Mallick; Anna Szécsényi-Nagy; Alissa Mittnik; Eveline Altena; Mark Lipson; Iosif Lazaridis; Thomas K Harper; Nick Patterson; Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht; Yoan Diekmann; Zuzana Faltyskova; Daniel Fernandes; Matthew Ferry; Eadaoin Harney; Peter de Knijff; Megan Michel; Jonas Oppenheimer; Kristin Stewardson; Alistair Barclay; Kurt Werner Alt; Corina Liesau; Patricia Ríos; Concepción Blasco; Jorge Vega Miguel; Roberto Menduiña García; Azucena Avilés Fernández; Eszter Bánffy; Maria Bernabò-Brea; David Billoin; Clive Bonsall; Laura Bonsall; Tim Allen; Lindsey Büster; Sophie Carver; Laura Castells Navarro; Oliver E Craig; Gordon T Cook; Barry Cunliffe; Anthony Denaire; Kirsten Egging Dinwiddy; Natasha Dodwell; Michal Ernée; Christopher Evans; Milan Kuchařík; Joan Francès Farré; Chris Fowler; Michiel Gazenbeek; Rafael Garrido Pena; María Haber-Uriarte; Elżbieta Haduch; Gill Hey; Nick Jowett; Timothy Knowles; Ken Massy; Saskia Pfrengle; Philippe Lefranc; Olivier Lemercier; Arnaud Lefebvre; César Heras Martínez; Virginia Galera Olmo; Ana Bastida Ramírez; Joaquín Lomba Maurandi; Tona Majó; Jacqueline I McKinley; Kathleen McSweeney; Balázs Gusztáv Mende; Alessandra Modi; Gabriella Kulcsár; Viktória Kiss; András Czene; Róbert Patay; Anna Endrődi; Kitti Köhler; Tamás Hajdu; Tamás Szeniczey; János Dani; Zsolt Bernert; Maya Hoole; Olivia Cheronet; Denise Keating; Petr Velemínský; Miroslav Dobeš; Francesca Candilio; Fraser Brown; Raúl Flores Fernández; Ana-Mercedes Herrero-Corral; Sebastiano Tusa; Emiliano Carnieri; Luigi Lentini; Antonella Valenti; Alessandro Zanini; Clive Waddington; Germán Delibes; Elisa Guerra-Doce; Benjamin Neil; Marcus Brittain; Mike Luke; Richard Mortimer; Jocelyne Desideri; Marie Besse; Günter Brücken; Mirosław Furmanek; Agata Hałuszko; Maksym Mackiewicz; Artur Rapiński; Stephany Leach; Ignacio Soriano; Katina T Lillios; João Luís Cardoso; Michael Parker Pearson; Piotr Włodarczak; T Douglas Price; Pilar Prieto; Pierre-Jérôme Rey; Roberto Risch; Manuel A Rojo Guerra; Aurore Schmitt; Joël Serralongue; Ana Maria Silva; Václav Smrčka; Luc Vergnaud; João Zilhão; David Caramelli; Thomas Higham; Mark G Thomas; Douglas J Kennett; Harry Fokkens; Volker Heyd; Alison Sheridan; Karl-Göran Sjögren; Philipp W Stockhammer; Johannes Krause; Ron Pinhasi; Wolfgang Haak; Ian Barnes; Carles Lalueza-Fox; David Reich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Megalithic tombs in western and northern Neolithic Europe were linked to a kindred society.

Authors:  Federico Sánchez-Quinto; Helena Malmström; Magdalena Fraser; Linus Girdland-Flink; Emma M Svensson; Luciana G Simões; Robert George; Nina Hollfelder; Göran Burenhult; Gordon Noble; Kate Britton; Sahra Talamo; Neil Curtis; Hana Brzobohata; Radka Sumberova; Anders Götherström; Jan Storå; Mattias Jakobsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians.

Authors:  Iain Mathieson; Iosif Lazaridis; Nadin Rohland; Swapan Mallick; Nick Patterson; Songül Alpaslan Roodenberg; Eadaoin Harney; Kristin Stewardson; Daniel Fernandes; Mario Novak; Kendra Sirak; Cristina Gamba; Eppie R Jones; Bastien Llamas; Stanislav Dryomov; Joseph Pickrell; Juan Luís Arsuaga; José María Bermúdez de Castro; Eudald Carbonell; Fokke Gerritsen; Aleksandr Khokhlov; Pavel Kuznetsov; Marina Lozano; Harald Meller; Oleg Mochalov; Vyacheslav Moiseyev; Manuel A Rojo Guerra; Jacob Roodenberg; Josep Maria Vergès; Johannes Krause; Alan Cooper; Kurt W Alt; Dorcas Brown; David Anthony; Carles Lalueza-Fox; Wolfgang Haak; Ron Pinhasi; David Reich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ancient Maltese genomes and the genetic geography of Neolithic Europe.

Authors:  Bruno Ariano; Valeria Mattiangeli; Emily M Breslin; Eóin W Parkinson; T Rowan McLaughlin; Jess E Thompson; Ronika K Power; Jay T Stock; Bernardette Mercieca-Spiteri; Simon Stoddart; Caroline Malone; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Lara M Cassidy; Daniel G Bradley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 10.900

2.  A high-resolution picture of kinship practices in an Early Neolithic tomb.

Authors:  Chris Fowler; Iñigo Olalde; Vicki Cummings; Ian Armit; Lindsey Büster; Sarah Cuthbert; Nadin Rohland; Olivia Cheronet; Ron Pinhasi; David Reich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  Efficiently Summarizing Relationships in Large Samples: A General Duality Between Statistics of Genealogies and Genomes.

Authors:  Peter Ralph; Kevin Thornton; Jerome Kelleher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA.

Authors:  Marianne Dehasque; María C Ávila-Arcos; David Díez-Del-Molino; Matteo Fumagalli; Katerina Guschanski; Eline D Lorenzen; Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Michael D Martin; Gemma G R Murray; Alexander S T Papadopulos; Nina Overgaard Therkildsen; Daniel Wegmann; Love Dalén; Andrew D Foote
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-03-18

5.  Evaluating genotype imputation pipeline for ultra-low coverage ancient genomes.

Authors:  Ruoyun Hui; Eugenia D'Atanasio; Lara M Cassidy; Christiana L Scheib; Toomas Kivisild
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Ancient DNA at the edge of the world: Continental immigration and the persistence of Neolithic male lineages in Bronze Age Orkney.

Authors:  Katharina Dulias; M George B Foody; Pierre Justeau; Marina Silva; Rui Martiniano; Gonzalo Oteo-García; Alessandro Fichera; Simão Rodrigues; Francesca Gandini; Alison Meynert; Kevin Donnelly; Timothy J Aitman; Andrew Chamberlain; Olivia Lelong; George Kozikowski; Dominic Powlesland; Clive Waddington; Valeria Mattiangeli; Daniel G Bradley; Jaroslaw Bryk; Pedro Soares; James F Wilson; Graeme Wilson; Hazel Moore; Maria Pala; Ceiridwen J Edwards; Martin B Richards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 12.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.