Atomic force microscopy (AFM) as well as scanning tunneling microscopy induced light emission (STM-LE) are, each on their own, powerful tools used to investigate a large variety of properties of single molecules adsorbed on a surface. However, accessing both structural information by AFM as well as optical information by STM-LE on the same molecule so far remains elusive. We present a combined high-resolution AFM and STM-LE study on single metal-oxide phthalocyanines. Using atomic manipulation, the molecules can be deliberately reduced. We demonstrate structure elucidation and adsorption geometry determination of single molecules with atomic resolution combined with optical characterization by STM-LE and the possibility of investigating the change in a molecule's exciton emission intensity by a chemical reaction.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) as well as scanning tunneling microscopy induced light emission (STM-LE) are, each on their own, powerful tools used to investigate a large variety of properties of single molecules adsorbed on a surface. However, accessing both structural information by AFM as well as optical information by STM-LE on the same molecule so far remains elusive. We present a combined high-resolution AFM and STM-LE study on single metal-oxide phthalocyanines. Using atomic manipulation, the molecules can be deliberately reduced. We demonstrate structure elucidation and adsorption geometry determination of single molecules with atomic resolution combined with optical characterization by STM-LE and the possibility of investigating the change in a molecule's exciton emission intensity by a chemical reaction.
Entities:
Keywords:
atom manipulation; atomic force microscopy; excitonic emission; on-surface chemical reaction; phthalocyanine; scanning tunneling microscopy; scanning tunneling microscopy induced light emission
Scanning
tunneling microscopy
induced light emission (STM-LE) on single molecules has recently emerged
and advanced rapidly[1−4] with astounding resolution not only spatially but also energetically.[5−7] For the intramolecular radiative transitions probed in STM-LE, different
excitation and decay mechanisms, relying on the coupling of tip and
sample, have been proposed.[2,3,7−11] However, whether an electronic and vibronic intramolecular transition
is fostered or not can substantially depend on the exact environment, e.g., the adsorption position.[12−14] Likewise, changes
in the molecular geometry and chemical structure, like the conformation
or the presence or absence or substitution of specific moieties, can
intrinsically alter a molecule’s optical properties.[3,14] However, combining structural and optical information such as exciton
energies in molecules remains challenging.Because STM is sensitive
to the electronic structure, STM-LE is
ideally suited for probing optoelectronic properties of single adsorbed
molecules, i.e., imaging the densities of molecular
frontier orbitals and measuring fundamental gaps[15−17] and exciton
energies.[2,4,6,10,11] High-resolution atomic
force microscopy (AFM), however, is highly sensitive to the forces
between probe and substrate. This allows the measurement of the structure
of molecules[18,19] and their adsorption geometry,
including conformation,[20] adsorption orientation,
site, and height.[21] Accordingly, AFM is
ideally suited to investigate the intermediates and products of on-surface
reactions[22−25] and reactions triggered by atom manipulation.[26−29] The combination of AFM with STM-LE
therefore enables the investigation of the change in a molecule’s
optoelectronic properties throughout a chemical reaction. In addition,
atomically precise assignment of symmetry axes of allowed radiative
transitions to the molecular structure could be facilitated by overlaying
STM-LE maps with high-resolution AFM images. The effect of adsorption
height as well as adsorption position on the quenching of the radiative
decay is accessible as well for suitable molecules, i.e., molecules with different stable adsorption conformations. Combining
both techniques is therefore a promising route to link atomically
resolved structural information with optical properties of individual
molecules.Here, we report on a combined AFM and STM-LE study,
allowing for
detailed structure determination with atomic resolution and controlled
atom manipulation conjunct with the investigation of optoelectronic
properties. We investigated vanadyl-phthalocyanine (VOPc) molecules
decoupled from a Ag(111) substrate by an ultrathin NaCl layer.Phthalocyanines (Pc) are well characterized because of their widespread
use in organic light-emitting diodes and photovoltaics,[30−32] making them an excellent model system for STM-LE experiments.[3−6,10] Because they offer the possibility
of induced on-surface chemical reactions, metal-oxide Pc are potentially
interesting to investigate the influence of reduction on their electronic
and optical properties. The reduced counterpart of VOPc, namely vanadium-phthalocyanine
(VPc), could thus far not be synthesized by standard solution chemistry.
It is therefore inaccessible to standard optical characterization
techniques, while VOPc has already been characterized.[33,34]We were able to specifically dissociate the central oxygen
using
atom manipulation.[23,35−38] The successful reduction of VOPc
to VPc could be confirmed by high-resolution AFM structural elucidation.
In the STM-LE spectra, VOPc showed a characteristic light emission
at 682 nm, while no light emission was detected from VPc.
Results and Discussion
Characterization
of Vanadyl-Phthalocyanine
VOPc (Figure a) was deposited
onto a cold (T ≈ 10 K) Ag(111) single crystal
partially covered by bilayer NaCl [NaCl(2 ML)/Ag(111)], yielding well-dispersed
single molecules. For the characterization and imaging, STM and STS
as well as non-contact AFM with CO-functionalized tips were deployed[18,39] (see the Methods section for details on
the sample preparation and experimental procedures).
Figure 1
(a) Ball-and-stick model
of VOPc. (b, c) Images of VOPc in O-up
(left column) and O-down (central column) conformation and VPc (right
column) acquired with (b) STM with CO-functionalized tip and (c) AFM
at different tip heights. (d) AFM data resolving the adsorption position
of VOPc O-up and O-down and VPc on bilayer NaCl. The grid indicates
the Cl sites, which are resolved in the outer regions of the images
by using a decreased tip height z. STM images were
acquired at a set point of V = 0.2 V and I = 0.5 pA. z indicates the tip height
relative to the STM set point. Positive z correspond
to an increased tip–sample distance.
(a) Ball-and-stick model
of VOPc. (b, c) Images of VOPc in O-up
(left column) and O-down (central column) conformation and VPc (right
column) acquired with (b) STM with CO-functionalized tip and (c) AFM
at different tip heights. (d) AFM data resolving the adsorption position
of VOPc O-up and O-down and VPc on bilayer NaCl. The grid indicates
the Cl sites, which are resolved in the outer regions of the images
by using a decreased tip height z. STM images were
acquired at a set point of V = 0.2 V and I = 0.5 pA. z indicates the tip height
relative to the STM set point. Positive z correspond
to an increased tip–sample distance.VOPc features two distinctively different adsorption conformations[40−42] on Ag(111) as well as on bilayer NaCl, which we observed with approximately
equal occurrences. Because the aim was to perform STM-LE experiments,
we will focus in the following only on VOPc adsorbed on bilayer NaCl,
which is necessary for electronic decoupling. The two different VOPc
species can be distinguished by their appearance in AFM and STM with
a CO-functionalized tip, as shown in Figure b,c. From the AFM images, they can be assigned
to a conformation with the central oxygen atom pointing away from
the surface (O-up) and toward the surface (O-down), respectively.[40−42] For the O-up conformation, only the outermost phenylene groups can
be resolved by AFM, while in the center, it exhibits an extended repulsive
feature stemming from the central oxygen sticking out of the surface
plane. In the O-down conformation, the full macrocycle can be resolved
by AFM. For small tip–sample distances, the core of the macrocycle
becomes distinctly more repulsive than the phenylene groups, indicating
that the macrocycle is not fully planar but rather dome-shaped. This
can be rationalized by the adsorption geometry; due to the oxygen
pointing toward the surface in the O-down conformation, the macrocycle
is pushed away from the surface in the center and bends slightly down
at the outer part. In both conformations, the molecule adsorbs with
the center on a Na site (Figure d). The reduced species VPc, shown in the right column
in Figure , can be
generated from VOPc O-up by atomic manipulation, as demonstrated in
the following.
On-Surface Synthesis of VPc from VOPc by
Atom Manipulation
Synthesizing VPc is known to be challenging
as it immediately oxidizes
to the more stable VOPc in oxygen containing environments. As of yet,
its synthesis has only been achieved by Eguchi et al. by on-surface metalation of free-base Pc in UHV-environment.[43] An alternative route to synthesizing VPc is
the controlled reduction of single VOPc molecules by SPM-based atom
manipulation. In this approach, the highly localized nature of the
electric field, tunneling current, or both between tip and molecule
is exploited.We found that the reduction reaction could be
actuated reliably. To that end, we first positioned the tip above
the center of a VOPc O-up at a set point of V = −2
V and I = 0.5 pA and then retracted the tip by about
2 Å. Next, the sample voltage was ramped from −2 to −4
V, resulting in currents on the order of 10 to 100 pA, and was held
constant for up to 30 s while the tip position was kept fixed. To
monitor whether and when a reaction occurred, tunneling current I and frequency shift Δf were recorded
simultaneously. The dissociation of the oxygen usually occurred after
a few to a few tens of seconds and was accompanied by a sharp drop
in current and increase in Δf, as shown in Figure for one exemplary
reaction. Subsequent imaging with AFM confirmed the structural change
(see Figure c); the
molecular structure is clearly different from both observed VOPc conformations.
Similar to VOPc O-down, the full macrocycle can be resolved by AFM.
However, the outermost phenylene groups appear distinctly brighter
compared to the central part. In the center, a bright, cross-shaped
feature is visible in the AFM images, a similar contrast as has also
been observed on other metal phthalocyanines such as FePc.[44,45] To quantify the non-planar adsorption geometries of the molecules,
we performed force–distance spectroscopy [Δf(z)], yielding the tip height z*, i.e., the tip height at which the minimum Δf(z) is reached,[21] with the tip placed above the center of the macrocycle (zc*) and a phenylene group (zp*), respectively. The difference in z* between both positions, in combination with the contrast
in the AFM images, provides a measure for the shape of the molecule.
For VOPc O-down, zc* is larger than zp*, corroborating
the finding from the AFM image in Figure b that the molecule is dome-shaped. After
the reaction, the bright appearance of the phenylene groups and the
dark center in the AFM image indicate a clear change in the molecule’s
shape. This is confirmed by force–distance spectroscopy, showing
that indeed the phenylene groups are further away from the surface
than the center of the molecule (zc* < zp*) (see the Supporting Information). This finding agrees
with the expected change in the molecular geometry upon dissociation
of the central oxygen. In addition, Figure d and the inset in Figure show a newly arisen defect in the vicinity
of the molecule after the reaction, presumably the dissociated oxygen
atom, which is adsorbed on a Cl–Cl bridge site. For these reasons,
we exclude a mere switching behavior between the O-up and O-down conformation.[42]
Figure 2
Tunnel current I and frequency shift
Δf recorded over time during the reduction
of a VOPc in O-up
conformation at V = −4 V. The reaction is
accompanied by a sharp drop in tunnel current and increase in Δf. The insets show constant-current STM images (I = 0.5 pA) before and after the spectrum was obtained.
Tunnel current I and frequency shift
Δf recorded over time during the reduction
of a VOPc in O-up
conformation at V = −4 V. The reaction is
accompanied by a sharp drop in tunnel current and increase in Δf. The insets show constant-current STM images (I = 0.5 pA) before and after the spectrum was obtained.Investigation of the adsorption
position reveals that after the
reaction, the molecule has rotated in-plane by about 45° and
moved laterally such that now its center is located on a Cl site (see Figure d). The AFM images
of VPc (Figure c,
right column) show the phenylene groups with an apparently increased
diameter and bond-like features appearing in the center of the rings.
We assign this contrast to two different energetically degenerate,
mirror symmetric adsorption orientations in which the symmetry axes
of the molecule are rotated by a few degrees with respect to the symmetry
axes of the surface. The adsorption orientation is switched under
the influence of the tip, preferring the orientation in which an outer
ring is located under the tip. The apparent bond-like features arising
within the rings appear at the tip positions at which the molecular
orientation switches.[29,46,47] This shuttling motion is already well-known for certain metal-phthalocyanines
adsorbed on different surfaces.[3,48]
STM-LE on VOPc and VPc
Even though there generally
is no one-to-one correspondence between the electronic transitions
probed by STS and the allowed optical transitions, they are often
closely related (in STM-LE). Measuring the differential conductance
thus can yield valuable information that complement the characterization
of a molecule’s optical properties.Figure displays STS and STM data
of the three different molecular species, i.e., VOPc
in O-up and O-down conformation as well as VPc, on bilayer NaCl on
Ag(111). The energy levels of VOPc O-up and O-down are shifted with
respect to each other. We tentatively explain this shift by a concurrence
of several effects. (i) The electrostatic dipole of the molecule,
related to its partial negative charge accumulation at the oxygen,
shifts both resonances to higher (lower) energies in the O-down (O-up)
adsorption conformation. (ii) The increased adsorption height of the
macrocycle in the O-down conformation will lead to an increased relative
voltage drop across the NaCl film[15,49] and, thus,
to an up-shifted negative ion resonance (NIR) and a down-shifted positive
ion resonance (PIR) compared to the O-up conformation. Both effects
work in the same direction in the case of the NIR, explaining its
significant upshift for the O-down conformation with respect to the
O-up conformation. In case of the PIR, which is found at similar energies
for both conformations, the effects work in opposite directions. (iii)
In addition, we cannot exclude shifts in the energies due to strain
in the different adsorption geometries[14] as well as a different response and reorganization of the NaCl due
to the different adsorption geometries.[50−52] The spatial distribution
of the molecular orbitals in VOPc in O-up and O-down conformation
is very similar, however. Slight variations are only present in the
center of the molecule, where the VO group is pointing in opposite
directions.
Figure 3
Differential conductance curves recorded on VOPc in O-up (orange)
and O-down (black) conformation and VPc (blue). The insets show the
respective orbital densities corresponding to the HOMO at negative
and the LUMO at positive voltages, measured with a metallic tip.
Differential conductance curves recorded on VOPc in O-up (orange)
and O-down (black) conformation and VPc (blue). The insets show the
respective orbital densities corresponding to the HOMO at negative
and the LUMO at positive voltages, measured with a metallic tip.After the reduction of VOPc to
VPc, also the electronic structure
of the molecule has significantly changed (Figure ). The spatial distributions of both the
highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied
molecular orbital (LUMO) look distinctly different compared to VOPc
in either conformation. Additionally, the PIR for intact VOPc in both
conformations is found at voltages below −2 V. In contrast,
the reduced VPc exhibits a PIR already at around −0.7 V. Hence,
imaging at bias voltages between −0.7 and −2 V serves
as a fingerprint to differentiate between VPc and VOPc, as shown in
the insets in Figure .To investigate whether the observed changes in adsorption
geometry
and electronic structure also affect the molecule’s optical
properties as VOPc is reduced to VPc, we recorded STM-LE spectra on
both species. The STM-LE spectra on pristine VOPc in O-up conformation
show a single peak at 682 nm (1.82 eV) for sample bias voltages V < −2.4 V with the tip positioned atop one of
the extremities of the macrocycle (Figure a). The excitonic emission stems from a radiative
transition from the degenerate Q-band to the ground state and is in
good agreement with experimental results for the energy of the Q-band
transition in (dissolved) VOPc.[33,34] Light emission could
only be observed above VOPc in the O-up conformation because for O-down,
it was not possible to establish stable conditions, i.e., the molecule would always jump to the tip or away for high bias
voltages and currents, which would both be needed for inducing as
well as detecting molecular luminescence on bilayer NaCl.
Figure 4
(a) STM-LE
spectrum recorded on a phenylene group of a VOPc (O-up)
(V = −2.6 V, I = 350 pA).
(b) Comparison of STM-LE spectra recorded on a phenylene group of
a VOPc before and after tip-induced reduction using the exact same
tip and parameters (V = −2.4 V, I = 150 pA). (c) Possible excitation mechanisms for molecular exciton
formation. The energy level diagram on the left shows the initial
state at V = 0 V applied bias. Upon applying
a sufficient bias voltage, two possible excitation mechanisms can
lead to exciton formation. Orange box: the tip’s electrochemical
potential μt is pulled below the PIR, allowing the
tunneling of an electron from the HOMO to the tip and thereby charging
the molecule positively (1). This leads to a downward
shift of the resonance for attaching electrons to the former LUMO
(LUMO of the neutral molecule), pulling it below the sample’s
electrochemical potential μs (2). The
LUMO can subsequently be occupied with an electron from the sample,
forming an exciton (3). Green box: electrons tunnel inelastically
between tip and sample (only shown here for negative bias voltage),
exciting a gap plasmon between tip and sample. This plasmon couples
to the molecular exciton, leading to its formation.
(a) STM-LE
spectrum recorded on a phenylene group of a VOPc (O-up)
(V = −2.6 V, I = 350 pA).
(b) Comparison of STM-LE spectra recorded on a phenylene group of
a VOPc before and after tip-induced reduction using the exact same
tip and parameters (V = −2.4 V, I = 150 pA). (c) Possible excitation mechanisms for molecular exciton
formation. The energy level diagram on the left shows the initial
state at V = 0 V applied bias. Upon applying
a sufficient bias voltage, two possible excitation mechanisms can
lead to exciton formation. Orange box: the tip’s electrochemical
potential μt is pulled below the PIR, allowing the
tunneling of an electron from the HOMO to the tip and thereby charging
the molecule positively (1). This leads to a downward
shift of the resonance for attaching electrons to the former LUMO
(LUMO of the neutral molecule), pulling it below the sample’s
electrochemical potential μs (2). The
LUMO can subsequently be occupied with an electron from the sample,
forming an exciton (3). Green box: electrons tunnel inelastically
between tip and sample (only shown here for negative bias voltage),
exciting a gap plasmon between tip and sample. This plasmon couples
to the molecular exciton, leading to its formation.After the dissociation of oxygen from VOPc O-up,
no emission was
observed on the product anymore, independent of the position of the
tip above the molecule. Figure b shows a direct comparison of the molecular luminescence
recorded with the tip positioned above one of the extremities of a
VOPC O-up before and after its reduction using the exact same tip
as well as the same STM set point and spectrum acquisition parameters.
The peak at 682 nm, which is clearly visible in the spectrum recorded
on VOPc (Figure b,
left spectrum), disappeared in the VPc spectrum (Figure b, right spectrum). Also, no
energetically shifted photon emission is detected on VPc for energies
down to the near-infrared of 1.2 eV (see the Methods section for more details). Taking spectra at different applied bias
voltages (−1.5 to −2.7 V and 2 to 2.4 V) also did not
lead to a detectable signal in the emission. The absence of detectable
luminescence could indicate either that no vibronic transition that
can undergo a radiative decay is excited or that the radiative decay
path is quenched compared to the situation in VOPc.For the
excitation of molecular excitons in STM-LE, two different
pathways are usually discussed,[2−4,7,8,10,11] shown in Figure c. They rely on either the emptying of the HOMO and
subsequent occupation of the LUMO (charge-injection mediated) or a
plasmon-mediated energy transfer to the molecule.The charge-injection
mediated process is illustrated in Figure c in the orange box.
Upon applying a sufficiently high negative bias voltage, the tip’s
electrochemical potential (μt) is shifted below the
PIR, allowing the depopulation of the HOMO by tunneling of an electron
into an unoccupied tip state (1). Charging the molecule
positively leads to an energetic down-shift of the resonances for
electron attachment due to reduced screening of the positive ion cores,
which is partly compensated by reorganization within molecule and
underlying substrate.[50] In addition, because
the tip and sample form a double-barrier tunneling junction, the energetic
positions of the molecular resonances with respect to the sample’s
electrochemical potential (μs) are affected by the
potential drop in the dielectric spacer layer separating molecule
and metallic substrate. For bilayer NaCl, this can be estimated to
be 5–10% of the applied bias voltage.[15,49] The sum of these effects can pull the resonance for attaching an
electron to the former LUMO (LUMO of the neutral molecule) below the
sample’s electrochemical potential, opening an additional tunneling
channel (2). This allows electrons to tunnel into the
former LUMO, creating an exciton (3).[2,3,11] Because the tunneling barrier for attaching
electrons into the former LUMO is lower compared to the one for the
former HOMO, the occupation of the LUMO is preferred.The plasmon-mediated
process (Figure c,
green box) requires the occurrence of
localized gap plasmon modes in the tip–sample junction. The
molecule is excited via a plasmon-mediated energy
transfer from inelastically tunneling electrons to the molecule. The
coupling strength of exciton and gap plasmon is dictated by their
energies and hence, in case of matching energies, exciton formation
as well as its radiative decay is fostered.[7,8,10]In the charge-injection picture, the
down-shift of the resonance
for attaching electrons to the former LUMO upon charging the molecule
positively at bias voltages of V = −2.6 V
might be sufficient to allow its population in the case of VOPc. In
VPc, however, the NIR is around 400 meV higher in energy than in VOPc.
Hence, the level shifting might be insufficient to pull this resonance
below the sample’s electrochemical potential in the positive
charge state. This, in turn, would prevent the formation of an exciton
in VPc in the charge-injection picture.The decrease in fundamental
gap upon reduction of VOPc observed
in STS could indicate a concurring red shift of the excitonic emission
that might also explain the absence of detectable emission. One possibility
could be that excitonic emission in VPc occurs below our minimal measured
energy of 1.2 eV. However, the exciton energy is challenging to quantitatively
deduce from the change in fundamental gap because a direct general
correlation is not given. Optical transitions are governed by symmetry
and optical selection rules and, furthermore, many-body effects can
have significant impact on both the involved energies and orbitals.[17,53,54] In metal Pc, the Q-band emission
is driven by a transition between the ground state of A1 symmetry and the first excited state
of Eu symmetry of the orbitals delocalized
over the macrocycle (π−π*).[55,56] The energy of this transition is usually only slightly affected
by a change in the metallic center.[57−59] This might indicate
that the change in exciton energy in VOPc driven by the reduction
of its metal oxide center is smaller than the change in fundamental
gap of 1 eV might suggest.For a change in exciton energy within
our optical detection window,
the absence of detectable luminescence could indicate a change in
the cross-section of gap plasmon and molecular exciton, considering
a plasmon-mediated excitation and decay. The plasmon resonance recorded
at the bare double-layer NaCl shows a broad maximum around 630 nm,
with still considerable intensity detected at around 680 nm (peak
in luminescence spectrum of VOPc; see the Supporting Information). For larger wavelengths (smaller energies), the
intensity of the plasmon resonance is significantly decreased, possibly
resulting in a less efficient energy transfer between plasmon and
exciton. For the decay of the molecular exciton, this means that less
modes are available within the cavity between tip and sample. Hence,
the radiative decay mechanism might be heavily quenched.Quenching
of the radiative decay channel could also be caused by
changes in the environment or geometrical changes within the molecule.[3,12−14] A change in adsorption site for example, as observed
for the reduction from VOPc to VPc, could significantly alter the
relative likelihood of different decay pathways. This could facilitate
a nonradiative decay of the molecular exciton, quenching the luminescence
to below our detection limit.
Conclusions
In
conclusion, we report on the realization of a combined AFM and
STM-LE study, allowing for the investigation of the change in excitonic
emission by a chemical reaction. As a model system, we used single
VOPc molecules adsorbed on NaCl(2 ML)/Ag(111). Using atom manipulation,
we were able to deliberately reduce VOPc to form VPc, which was confirmed
by AFM atomic resolution imaging, adsorption site determination, and
force–distance spectroscopy, and compare the emission characteristics
before and after the chemical reaction using STM-LE. While for VOPc,
a peak at 682 nm (1.82 eV) was clearly visible, no light emission
was detected on VPc. Based on STS measurements on the different molecules,
we relate this to a shift in energies of the molecular resonances
with respect to the electrochemical potential. Possible explanations
for the absence of excitonic emission after reduction to VPc are the
hindrance of charge transfer into the LUMO (charge-injection mediated
process), a quenching of radiative decay (plasmon-mediated process)
or a shift of the exciton energy out of our optical detection window.The combination of AFM with STM-LE allows the linking of a molecule’s
structure with its optoelectronic properties. This approach can be
extended using Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) to incorporate
the internal charge distribution, charge state, or dipole moment as
well. Exploiting the AFM’s capabilities for precise atom manipulation,
this can be used to investigate the change in a molecule’s
properties induced by a chemical reaction. Due to the low-temperature
and UHV environment, this provides access to the properties of molecules
that cannot be synthesized by standard solution chemistry or where
standard optical characterization is not possible, as shown for VPc.
Moreover, STM-LE could assist AFM in the identification of molecules
within complex molecular mixtures[60−62] by providing complementary
information on the same individual molecule.
Methods
STM and
AFM Measurements
The STM and AFM measurements
were performed with a home-built combined STM/AFM setup operating
at ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) conditions (p ≈
1 × 10–10 mbar) and low temperatures (T ≈ 5 K). The microscope is equipped with a qPlus
force sensor[63] operated in the frequency
modulation mode[64] (resonance frequency f0 ≈ 30 kHz, quality factor Q ≈ 100 000, spring constant k ≈
1800 N m–1, oscillation amplitude A ≈ 0.5 Å). The bias voltage is applied to the sample.
All STM images were acquired in constant-current mode, AFM images
were taken in constant-height mode at 0 V bias voltage. For optical
detection, we used a spectrograph (Acton SP-300i, Princeton Instruments)
coupled to a liquid nitrogen cooled CCD camera (PyLoN, Princeton Instruments)
with a spectral resolution of about 0.2 nm and a solid angle for the
detection of Ω ≈ 0.03. STM-LE spectra were recorded in
an energy range of 1.28–3.07 eV (404–969 nm) and 1.18–2.53
eV (491–1054 nm) and by averaging over several frames, where
each frame typically lasted 3 to 4 min, yielding total acquisition
times per spectrum between 8 and 60 min. The shown spectra are background
corrected.
Sample and Tip Preparation
As a
substrate, we used
a Ag(111) single crystal partially covered with (100)-oriented, 2
monolayer (ML) thick NaCl islands [NaCl(2 ML)/Ag(111)]. The Ag crystal
was in situ cleaned by repeated Ne-ion sputtering
and annealing (T ≈ 720 K) cycles. Subsequently,
NaCl was evaporated, while the sample was kept at T ≈ 430 K such that (100)-oriented mostly double-layered NaCl
islands were formed on the Ag substrate. The microscope tip consisted
of a PtIr-wire (25 μm in diameter) that was sharpened using
a focused ion beam followed by in situ indentations
into the bare Ag surface to prepare a clean and atomically sharp tip.
For tip apex passivation, CO was deposited on the cold (T ≈ 10 K) Ag surface by dosing gaseous CO into the UHV chamber.
For functionalizing the tip apex, a CO molecule was picked up from
the surface.[18,65] The VOPc molecules were deposited
on the cold (T = 10 K) sample via sublimation from a Si-wafer that was flash-annealed to approximately
900 K within a few seconds.
Authors: Z-C Dong; X-L Guo; A S Trifonov; P S Dorozhkin; K Miki; K Kimura; S Yokoyama; S Mashiko Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2004-02-24 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Jascha Repp; Gerhard Meyer; Sladjana M Stojković; André Gourdon; Christian Joachim Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2005-01-19 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Sreekanta Debnath; Karolina A Haupa; Sergei Lebedkin; Dmitry Strelnikov; Manfred M Kappes Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Tzu-Chao Hung; Brian Kiraly; Julian H Strik; Alexander A Khajetoorians; Daniel Wegner Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 12.262