Literature DB >> 31183864

Long-term studies of bighorn sheep and mountain goats reveal fitness costs of reproduction.

Marco Festa-Bianchet1,2, Steeve D Côté2,3, Sandra Hamel4, Fanie Pelletier1,2.   

Abstract

Fitness costs of reproduction are expected when resources are limited. Costs drive the evolution of life-history strategies and can affect population dynamics if females change their allocation of resources to reproduction. We studied fitness costs of reproduction in mountain ungulates in Alberta, Canada. We monitored two populations of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) for 44 and 30 years, and one of mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) for 30 years. Both species are highly iteroparous. Heterogeneity in individual reproductive potential makes fitness costs of reproduction difficult to detect and quantify without manipulations. In capital breeders, individual differences can be partly accounted for by considering body mass and other correlates of reproductive potential. Long-term monitoring can reveal costs that only manifest under stressful conditions such as disease or resource scarcity. Despite individual differences in reproductive potential, we detected fitness costs of reproduction in females. Costs, in terms of mass gain and survival, are almost entirely born by subsequent offspring, as mothers prioritize their own maintenance and survival. Costs are greater for primiparous females, decrease with increasing body mass and increase as resource availability declines, and sons are costlier than daughters. Costs may increase for senescent females that appear to reduce allocation to reproduction. In bighorn sheep, costs mostly involve reduced mass gain and lower survival of subsequent offspring. In mountain goats, costs include reductions in mass gain, subsequent fecundity and juvenile survival. In males, fitness costs derive mostly from attempts to reproduce rather than from siring success and likely depend upon individual competitiveness. In the absence of selective harvests, dominant males may enjoy high fitness and possibly lower costs compared to subordinates. The conservative reproductive tactic of mountain ungulate females likely explains why density dependence mostly involves later primiparity and lower recruitment, but rarely affects adult survival. Future research will seek to better account for heterogeneity in reproductive potential, assess cumulative reproductive costs and investigate the potential effects of fathers on maternal allocation tactics.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  individual differences; long-term monitoring; mountain ungulates; population dynamics; predation; reproductive potential; reproductive strategies; wildlife conservation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31183864     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  5 in total

1.  Late-life costs of raising sons in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Hannah Froy; Marlène Gamelon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Impact of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae on juvenile bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) survival in the northern Basin and Range ecosystem.

Authors:  Robert S Spaan; Clinton W Epps; Rachel Crowhurst; Donald Whittaker; Mike Cox; Adam Duarte
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic-breeding seabird.

Authors:  Rolanda J Steenweg; Glenn T Crossin; Holly L Hennin; H Grant Gilchrist; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Habitat and climate shape growth patterns in a mountain ungulate.

Authors:  Rudolf Reiner; Andreas Zedrosser; Hubert Zeiler; Klaus Hackländer; Luca Corlatti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Temporal correlations among demographic parameters are ubiquitous but highly variable across species.

Authors:  Rémi Fay; Sandra Hamel; Martijn van de Pol; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Nigel G Yoccoz; Paul Acker; Matthieu Authier; Benjamin Larue; Christie Le Coeur; Kaitlin R Macdonald; Alex Nicol-Harper; Christophe Barbraud; Christophe Bonenfant; Dirk H Van Vuren; Emmanuelle Cam; Karine Delord; Marlène Gamelon; Maria Moiron; Fanie Pelletier; Jay Rotella; Celine Teplitsky; Marcel E Visser; Caitlin P Wells; Nathaniel T Wheelwright; Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 11.274

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.