Literature DB >> 31183758

An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries.

Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente1, Korhan K Gokmenoglu2, Nigar Taspinar2, José María Cantos-Cantos3.   

Abstract

This study examines the nonlinear relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and the ecological footprint (EF), trying to confirm the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). We use a panel data model for MINT (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey) countries in the period 1990-2013 and an empirical framework based on the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). Using the fully modified least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) econometric methodologies, the empirical results confirm an inverted-U relationship between FDI and the ecological footprint. To reinforce our analysis, we check the connection between economic growth and the ecological footprint, validating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis for MINT countries. Finally, we also confirm a negative connection between renewable energy use, the urbanization process, and the changes in the ecological footprint. These findings offer a series of useful recommendations for policymakers, where the promotion of clean industries and energy-efficiency actions are essential for reducing environmental damage in MINT countries. We highlight the viability of the ecological footprint as a first-order environmental indicator whose evolution is determined by demographic fluctuations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological footprint; Economic growth; Foreign direct investment; Pollution haven hypothesis; Renewable energy; Urban population

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31183758     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  6 in total

1.  Environmental policy implementation in rural China: a case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang.

Authors:  K E Swanson; R G Kuhn; W Xu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bakirtas; Mumin Atalay Cetin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biofuels that cause land-use change may have much larger non-GHG air quality emissions than fossil fuels.

Authors:  C-C Tsao; J E Campbell; M Mena-Carrasco; S N Spak; G R Carmichael; Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels.

Authors:  Daniel Balsalobre; Agustín Álvarez; José María Cantos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve.

Authors:  Daniel Balsalobre Lorente; Agustín Álvarez-Herranz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective.

Authors:  Qianqian Liu; Shaojian Wang; Wenzhong Zhang; Dongsheng Zhan; Jiaming Li
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 7.963

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Revisiting the role of forestry, agriculture, and renewable energy in testing environment Kuznets curve in Pakistan: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach.

Authors:  Noshaba Aziz; Arshian Sharif; Ali Raza; Kong Rong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Does the pollution halo hypothesis exist in this "better" world? The evidence from STIRPAT model.

Authors:  Nhan Nguyen-Thanh; Kuo-Hsuan Chin; Van Nguyen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Carbon Emissions in the SAARC Countries with Causal Effects of FDI, Economic Growth and Other Economic Factors: Evidence from Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Models.

Authors:  Rashid Latief; Yusheng Kong; Sohail Ahmad Javeed; Usman Sattar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The air pollution effect of government economic growth expectations: evidence from China's cities based on green technology.

Authors:  Linhui Wang; Hui Wang; Zhiqing Dong; Shixiang Wang; Zhanglu Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Where is the gray side of green growth? Theoretical insights, policy directions, and evidence from a multidimensional approach.

Authors:  Mehmet Demiral; Ozge Demiral
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Is the Relocation of Polluting Industries Prompted by FDI Flow and Stock, Globalisation, Corruption and Regulation?

Authors:  Patrícia Hipólito Leal; Rafaela Vital Caetano; António Cardoso Marques
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The effects of air transportation, energy, ICT and FDI on economic growth in the industry 4.0 era: Evidence from the United States.

Authors:  Festus Fatai Adedoyin; Festus Victor Bekun; Oana M Driha; Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente
Journal:  Technol Forecast Soc Change       Date:  2020-09-11

8.  The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Pollution in China: Corruption Matters.

Authors:  Shi Wang; Hua Wang; Qian Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Environmental regulation and manufacturing carbon emissions in China: a new perspective on local government competition.

Authors:  Chanyuan Liu; Long Xin; Jinye Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.190

10.  Environmental strategies for achieving a new foreign direct investment golden decade in Algeria.

Authors:  Maroua Chaouachi; Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.190

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.