Genna R Cohen1, Charles P Friedman2, Andrew M Ryan3, Caroline R Richardson4, Julia Adler-Milstein5. 1. Mathematica, Washington, DC, USA. gcohen@mathematica-mpr.com. 2. Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, University of California San Francisco Department of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physician-to-physician variation in electronic health record (EHR) documentation not driven by patients' clinical status could be harmful. OBJECTIVE: Measure variation in completion of common clinical documentation domains. Identify perceived causes and effects of variation and strategies to mitigate negative effects. DESIGN: Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods using log data from a commercial EHR vendor and semi-structured interviews with outpatient primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: Quantitative: 170,332 encounters led by 809 physicians in 237 practices. Qualitative: 40 interviewees in 10 practices. MAIN MEASURES: Interquartile range (IQR) of the proportion of encounters in which a physician completed documentation, for each documentation category. Multilevel linear regression measured the proportion of variation at the physician level. KEY RESULTS: Five clinical documentation categories had substantial and statistically significant (p < 0.001) variation at the physician level after accounting for state, organization, and practice levels: (1) discussing results (IQR = 50.8%, proportion of variation explained by physician level = 78.1%); (2) assessment and diagnosis (IQR = 60.4%, physician-level variation = 76.0%); (3) problem list (IQR = 73.1%, physician-level variation = 70.1%); (4) review of systems (IQR = 62.3%, physician-level variation = 67.7%); and (5) social history (IQR = 53.3%, physician-level variation = 62.2%). Drivers of variation from interviews included user preferences and EHR designs with multiple places to record similar information. Variation was perceived to create documentation inefficiencies and risk patient harm due to missed or misinterpreted information. Mitigation strategies included targeted user training during EHR implementation and practice meetings focused on documentation standardization. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-to-physician variation in EHR documentation impedes effective and safe use of EHRs, but there are potential strategies to mitigate negative consequences.
BACKGROUND: Physician-to-physician variation in electronic health record (EHR) documentation not driven by patients' clinical status could be harmful. OBJECTIVE: Measure variation in completion of common clinical documentation domains. Identify perceived causes and effects of variation and strategies to mitigate negative effects. DESIGN: Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods using log data from a commercial EHR vendor and semi-structured interviews with outpatient primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: Quantitative: 170,332 encounters led by 809 physicians in 237 practices. Qualitative: 40 interviewees in 10 practices. MAIN MEASURES: Interquartile range (IQR) of the proportion of encounters in which a physician completed documentation, for each documentation category. Multilevel linear regression measured the proportion of variation at the physician level. KEY RESULTS: Five clinical documentation categories had substantial and statistically significant (p < 0.001) variation at the physician level after accounting for state, organization, and practice levels: (1) discussing results (IQR = 50.8%, proportion of variation explained by physician level = 78.1%); (2) assessment and diagnosis (IQR = 60.4%, physician-level variation = 76.0%); (3) problem list (IQR = 73.1%, physician-level variation = 70.1%); (4) review of systems (IQR = 62.3%, physician-level variation = 67.7%); and (5) social history (IQR = 53.3%, physician-level variation = 62.2%). Drivers of variation from interviews included user preferences and EHR designs with multiple places to record similar information. Variation was perceived to create documentation inefficiencies and risk patient harm due to missed or misinterpreted information. Mitigation strategies included targeted user training during EHR implementation and practice meetings focused on documentation standardization. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-to-physician variation in EHR documentation impedes effective and safe use of EHRs, but there are potential strategies to mitigate negative consequences.
Entities:
Keywords:
EHR; documentation; mixed methods; primary care
Authors: Stephanie E Pollard; Pamela M Neri; Allison R Wilcox; Lynn A Volk; Deborah H Williams; Gordon D Schiff; Harley Z Ramelson; David W Bates Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-04-28 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Clemens S Hong; Steven J Atlas; Yuchiao Chang; S V Subramanian; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Michael J Barry; Richard W Grant Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nita G Valikodath; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Paul P Lee; David C Musch; Leslie M Niziol; Maria A Woodward Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Derek W Meeks; Michael W Smith; Lesley Taylor; Dean F Sittig; Jean M Scott; Hardeep Singh Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thaciana Dos Santos Alcântara; Fernando Castro de Araújo Neto; Helena Ferreira Lima; Dyego Carlos S Anacleto de Araújo; Júlia Mirão Sanchez; Giulyane Targino Aires-Moreno; Carina de Carvalho Silvestre; Divaldo P de Lyra Junior Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Victoria Y Vivtcharenko; Sonali Ramesh; Kimberly C Dukes; Hardeep Singh; Loreen A Herwaldt; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Christina L Cifra Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Sunyang Fu; Andrew Wen; Gavin M Schaeferle; Patrick M Wilson; Gabriel Demuth; Xiaoyang Ruan; Sijia Liu; Curtis Storlie; Hongfang Liu Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Anastasia Pozdnyakova Piersa; Neda Laiteerapong; Sandra A Ham; Felipe Fernandez Del Castillo; Sachin Shah; Deborah L Burnet; Wei Wei Lee Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-07-11 Impact factor: 2.655