Elisa Giorli1,2, E Schirinzi3,4, R Baldi5, A Mannironi6,3, E Raggio5, N Reale3, C Gandolfo3,7, M Del Sette3,4. 1. Unit of Neurology, St. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy. elisa.giorli@me.com. 2. A.L.I.Ce. Liguria, Associazione Lotta all'Ictus Cerebrale, Genoa, Italy. elisa.giorli@me.com. 3. A.L.I.Ce. Liguria, Associazione Lotta all'Ictus Cerebrale, Genoa, Italy. 4. Unit of Neurology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy. 5. S.S.D. Epidemiology, St. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy. 6. Unit of Neurology, St. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy. 7. Department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Genetics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Best medical treatments of ischemic stroke are admission to stroke unit, intravenous thrombolysis and, in selected cases, thrombectomy. Time from symptom onset to interventions is the best predictor of clinical outcome. In order to verify the effectiveness of an active education programme of awareness on the knowledge of stroke, we performed a local campaign "on the field". SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We selected 101 subjects from the general population who took part in the "stroke awareness campaign" organised by the Italian Association for the fight against stroke (A.L.I.Ce). Mean age was 59 years (50% female; 50% male); 55% of the sample reported a high level of education (> 8 years: high school or university degree). After a short multiple-choice questionnaire, we administered a face-to-face standard educational protocol (15 min). The efficacy of that educational intervention was then verified after a period of 12 months, by telephone interview. RESULTS: There was improvement both in the definition of stroke (66% vs. 92%, p < .001) and in recognizing symptoms and signs (19% vs. 72%, p < .001). Knowledge of the importance of stroke unit in the acute treatment of stroke did not improve, as it was already high on baseline (92% vs. 97%, p: n.s.). The improvement was evident in particular in younger and higher educated people, without difference in gender. There was no difference based on risk factor profiles of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a personalised education can improve knowledge on stroke symptoms and signs, independently of gender and personal risk factors. The results should be verified in larger and less selection population.
INTRODUCTION: Best medical treatments of ischemic stroke are admission to stroke unit, intravenous thrombolysis and, in selected cases, thrombectomy. Time from symptom onset to interventions is the best predictor of clinical outcome. In order to verify the effectiveness of an active education programme of awareness on the knowledge of stroke, we performed a local campaign "on the field". SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We selected 101 subjects from the general population who took part in the "stroke awareness campaign" organised by the Italian Association for the fight against stroke (A.L.I.Ce). Mean age was 59 years (50% female; 50% male); 55% of the sample reported a high level of education (> 8 years: high school or university degree). After a short multiple-choice questionnaire, we administered a face-to-face standard educational protocol (15 min). The efficacy of that educational intervention was then verified after a period of 12 months, by telephone interview. RESULTS: There was improvement both in the definition of stroke (66% vs. 92%, p < .001) and in recognizing symptoms and signs (19% vs. 72%, p < .001). Knowledge of the importance of stroke unit in the acute treatment of stroke did not improve, as it was already high on baseline (92% vs. 97%, p: n.s.). The improvement was evident in particular in younger and higher educated people, without difference in gender. There was no difference based on risk factor profiles of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a personalised education can improve knowledge on stroke symptoms and signs, independently of gender and personal risk factors. The results should be verified in larger and less selection population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Awareness; Educational project; Information campaign; Stroke
Authors: Dawn O Kleindorfer; Joseph P Broderick; Jane Khoury; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Arthur Pancioli; Edward Jauch; Rosie Miller; Brett M Kissela Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: M Rasura; M Baldereschi; A Di Carlo; F Di Lisi; R Patella; B Piccardi; B Polizzi; D Inzitari Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Mark J Alberts; Lawrence R Wechsler; Mary E Lee Jensen; Richard E Latchaw; Todd J Crocco; Mary G George; James Baranski; Robert R Bass; Robert L Ruff; Judy Huang; Barbara Mancini; Tammy Gregory; Daryl Gress; Marian Emr; Margo Warren; Michael D Walker Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jan Lecouturier; Helen Rodgers; Madeleine J Murtagh; Martin White; Gary A Ford; Richard G Thomson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.295