| Literature DB >> 31183613 |
Raquel Dall'Agnol Martarello1, Luana Cunha1, Samuel Leite Cardoso1, Marcela Medeiros de Freitas1, Damaris Silveira1, Yris Maria Fonseca-Bazzo1, Mauricio Homem-de-Mello1, Edivaldo Ximenes Ferreira Filho2, Pérola Oliveira Magalhães3.
Abstract
β-Galactosidases are widely used for industrial applications. These enzymes could be used in reactions of lactose hydrolysis and transgalactosylation. The objective of this study was the production, purification, and characterization of an extracellular β-galactosidase from a filamentous fungus, Aspergillus niger. The enzyme production was optimized by a factorial design. Maximal β-galactosidase activity (24.64 U/mL) was found in the system containing 2% of a soybean residue (w/v) at initial pH 7.0, 28 °C, 120 rpm in 7 days. ANOVA of the optimization study indicated that the response data on temperature and pH were significant (p < 0.05). The regression equation indicated that the R2 is 0.973. Ultrafiltration at a 100 and 30 kDa cutoff followed by gel filtration and anion exchange chromatography were carried out to purify the fungal β-galactosidase. SDS-PAGE revealed a protein with molecular weight of approximately 76 kDa. The partially purified enzyme showed an optimum temperature of 50 °C and optimum pH of 5.0, being stable under these conditions for 15 h. The enzyme was exposed to conditions approaching gastric pH and in pepsin's presence, 80% of activity was preserved after 2 h. These results reveal a A. niger β-galactosidase obtained from residue with favorable characteristics for food industries.Entities:
Keywords: Agroindustrial residues; Fungi; Optimization; Purification; β-Galactosidase
Year: 2019 PMID: 31183613 PMCID: PMC6557963 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-019-0805-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Variables values of a 23 factorial design with centered face and three repetitions at the central point used to evaluate the influence of (X1) speed agitation, (X2) temperature and (X3) pH on β-galactosidase production
| Variables | Symbol code | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| − 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Speed agitation (rpm) |
| 100 | 120 | 140 |
| Temperature (oC) |
| 22 | 28 | 34 |
| pH |
| 5 | 7 | 9 |
Fig. 1β-galactosidase activity in different soybean products, after 7 days of submerse fermentation at 120 rpm and 28 °C
Results of β-galactosidase activity (U/mL), according to the 23 factorial design with centered face and three repetitions at the central point central
| Run orders | Coded levels | β-Galactosidaseactivity (U/mL)a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 19.64 |
| 2 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 19.02 |
| 3 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | 7.07 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 8.83 |
| 5 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | 10.06 |
| 6 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 0.03 |
| 7 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.4 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.64 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.60 |
Data: (X) speed agitation, (X) temperature and (X) pH on β-galactosidase production
aOne unit (U) of β-galactosidase activity was defined as the amount of the enzyme catalyzing the release of 1 µmol of o-nitrophenol per min at 410 nm (Nagy et al. 2001)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for β-galactosidase activity
| Source | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model | 18.21 | 0.018 |
| Speed agitation | 1.92 | 0.259 |
| Temperature | 32.17 | 0.010 |
| pH | 60.04 | 0.004 |
|
| 5.83 | 0.094 |
|
| 3.22 | 0.170 |
|
| 6.07 | 0.090 |
| Lack of fit | 9.110 | 0.094 |
The model including as independent variables (X1) agitation, (X2) temperature and (X3) pH
Fig. 2Response surface curve of β-galactosidase activity affected by temperature and pH using the 2-factor central composite design
Fig. 3Time courses of β-galactosidase production by Aspergillus niger under optimized conditions (120 rpm, 28 °C, initial medium pH 7), using medium supplemented with 2% of soybean residue. Medium pH (∙∙∙∙), protein (mg/mL) (---) and β-galactosidase activity (—)
Summary of purification steps of β-galactosidase from A. niger
| Purification steps | Protein (mg/mL) | Activity (UI/mL) | Specific activity (UI/mg) | Yield (%) | Purification (fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | 0.150 | 26.000 | 173.333 | 100.000 | 1.000 |
| < 100 | 0.144 | 24.000 | 166.667 | 92.308 | 0.962 |
| > 30 | 0.065 | 23.440 | 360.615 | 90.154 | 2.080 |
| S-200 | 0.0075 | 6.570 | 876.000 | 25.269 | 5.054 |
| DEAE | 0.003 | 4.506 | 1502.000 | 17.331 | 8.665 |
Substrate specificity of β-galactosidase partially purified from Aspergillus niger
| Substratea | Activity (UI/mL)b |
|---|---|
| ONPG | 22.125 ± 0.018 |
| Lactose | 5.622 ± 0.002 |
| CM-cellulose | 0.253 ± 0.004 |
| ρNPG | 0.043 ± 0.005 |
aONPG: o-nitrophenol-β-d-galactopyranoside; ρNPG: ρ-nitrophenol-β-d-galactopyranoside; CM-cellulose: carboxymethyl celulose; Lactose: β-d-galactopyranosyl-(1→4)-d-glucose
bOne unit (U) of β-galactosidase activity was defined as the amount of the enzyme catalyzing the release of 1 µmol of o-nitrophenol per min at 410 nm (Nagy et al. 2001)
Fig. 4a SDS-PAGE of partially purified β-galactosidase. Lane 1: Molecular mass markers, mass indicated alongside. Lane 2: S-200 peak. Lane3: DEAE peak. b β-galactosidase activity zymogram from DEAE peak
Fig. 5a Activity versus pH profiles of the partially purified β-galactosidase. Enzyme activity is plotted as a % value relative to the activity displayed at the enzyme’s optimum pH. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the measured data values from the mean, n = 3. b Activity versus temperature profiles of the partially purified β-galactosidase. Enzyme activity is plotted as a % value relative to the activity displayed at the enzyme’s optimum temperature. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the measured data values from the mean, n = 3. c Temperature stability of the β-galactosidase partially purified from A. niger at 4 °C, 50 °C and 70 °C
Fig. 6The effect of in vitro simulated fasted gastric (SGF) conditions on partially purified β-galactosidase. Control: enzyme incubated with buffer pH 2.0. Enzyme + SGF (NaCl 2%, bovine pepsin 0.32% and HCl 7%). *Indicates statistical difference in the ANOVA Tukey test with significance level (p < 0.05) between control and enzyme + SGF