Literature DB >> 31183461

Comparison of Haemodynamic Response to Inhalational Bolus with Desflurane in Normotensive and Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Kamlesh Kumari1, Tanvir Samra1, Vikas Saini1, Sameer Sethi1, Neerja Banerjee2, Sujata Sharma2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Desflurane causes sympathetic stimulation at high end-tidal concentrations. We conducted this study to compare the haemodynamic response to inhalational bolus with desflurane in normotensive and hypertensive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: In this prospective, clinical trial, 40 patients aged 18-60 years and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into normotensives (Group N; n=20) and hypertensives (Group H; n=20). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and bispectral index (BIS) were measured at baseline and every 60 s for 5 min after induction, intubation, initiation and inhalational bolus of desflurane. The primary objective was to compare haemodynamic response, and the secondary objective was to assess the need for inhalational boluses and to compare the number of overcorrections and undercorrections in BIS value after each inhalational bolus. An independent t-test was used to compare the means of the study parameters between the groups, and a dependent t-test was used to compare the percentage change in the means of the study parameters within the same group. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients responding with a decrease, increase or no change of HR or MAP were seen between the two groups after inhalational bolus of desflurane. An overcorrection of BIS (value <45) was seen in 60% of the patients in Group H and 15% of the patients in Group N (p=0.003). None of the patients in either group had an undercorrection (BIS>55).
CONCLUSION: BIS-guided desflurane administration and BIS-triggered inhalational boluses of desflurane is safe, feasible and does not cause sympathetic stimulation in either normotensive or hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthetics inhalational; bolus; cardiovascular effects; complications; desflurane

Year:  2018        PMID: 31183461      PMCID: PMC6537963          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.93457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  13 in total

1.  Optimization of desflurane administration in morbidly obese patients: a comparison with sevoflurane using an 'inhalation bolus' technique.

Authors:  L E C De Baerdemaeker; M M R F Struys; S Jacobs; N M M Den Blauwen; G R P J Bossuyt; P Pattyn; E P Mortier
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Pulmonary mechanics during isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia.

Authors:  Y Dikmen; E Eminoglu; Z Salihoglu; S Demiroluk
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Cardiovascular stability during inhalational anaesthesia in morbidly obese patients: which is better, sevoflurane or desflurane?

Authors:  A Casati; G Torri
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Desflurane might not be the optimal volatile anaesthetic in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  T M Hemmerling; J F Olivier
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Propofol, but not etomidate, reduces desflurane-mediated sympathetic activation in humans.

Authors:  C W Lopatka; M Muzi; T J Ebert
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  An inhalation bolus of sevoflurane versus an intravenous bolus of remifentanil for controlling hemodynamic responses to surgical stress during major surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Emilio Matute; Estíbaliz Alsina; Rosario Roses; Guadalupe Blanc; Concepción Pérez-Hernández; Fernando Gilsanz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Induction and recovery characteristics of desflurane in day case patients: a comparison with propofol.

Authors:  S R Wrigley; J E Fairfield; R M Jones; A E Black
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Minimal effective dose of magnesium sulfate for attenuation of intubation response in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Nidhi B Panda; Neerja Bharti; Seema Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.452

9.  Comparison of maintenance and emergence characteristics after desflurane or sevoflurane in outpatient anaesthesia.

Authors:  Ravi Jindal; Ved Prakash Kumra; Krishan Kumar Narani; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01

10.  Prophylactic effect of ephedrine to reduce hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia induction with propofol and remifentanil.

Authors:  Mansoor Masjedi; Farid Zand; Asif Perviz Kazemi; Ali Hoseinipour
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative effect of desflurane and sevoflurane on liver function tests of patients with impaired hepatic function undergoing cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Rabie Soliman; Abdelbadee Yacoub; Mostafa Abdellatif
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.