| Literature DB >> 31183343 |
Zhao-Cheng Jian1, Jin-Feng Long2, Yu-Jiang Liu1, Xiang-Dong Hu1, Ji-Bin Liu3, Xian-Quan Shi1, Wei-Sheng Li1, Lin-Xue Qian4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staging diagnosis of liver fibrosis is a prerequisite for timely diagnosis and therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. In recent years, ultrasound elastography has become an important method for clinical noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis stage, but its diagnostic value for early liver fibrosis still needs to be further improved. In this study, the texture analysis was carried out on the basis of two dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), and the feasibility of 2D-SWE plus texture analysis in the diagnosis of early liver fibrosis was discussed. AIM: To assess the diagnostic value of 2D-SWE combined with textural analysis in liver fibrosis staging.Entities:
Keywords: Elastography; Liver fibrosis, Staging; Texture analysis; Two-dimensional shear wave
Year: 2019 PMID: 31183343 PMCID: PMC6547320 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i10.1122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Figure 1Texture analysis process. Step 1, texture analysis software was used to delineate the filling area (without filling defect area) on the raw elastic image, avoiding vascular and biliary cavities. Step 2, a texture analysis image was generated. Step 3, 4 sets of indexes were acquired from 4 different angles (0o, 45o, 135o, and 180o), including contrast, correlation, angular second moment, and homogeneity. ASM: Angular second moment.
Distribution of patients with liver fibrosis
| F0 | 7 | 8 | 36.8 ± 11.1 |
| F1 | 6 | 3 | 39.8 ± 14.9 |
| F2 | 3 | 6 | 52.4 ± 8.6 |
| F3 | 2 | 3 | 49.4 ± 8.1 |
| F4 | 2 | 4 | 59.3 ± 9.3 |
Comparison of two dimensional shear wave elastography and textural features in different groups (Median, Range)
| F0 | F0 | 5.97 (4.07-11.03) | 0.001 | 1.51 (0.44-6.69) | < 0.001 | 0.97 (0.79-0.99) | 0.72 | 0.056 (0.015-0.87) | 0.087 | 0.76 (0.64-0.97) | 0.002 |
| F1-4 | 10.63 (6.40-44.87) | 8.39 (1.39-200.76) | 0.96 (0.67-0.99 | 0.043 (0.003-0.33) | 0.54 (0.33-0.87) | ||||||
| F0-1 | F0-1 | 7.78 (4.07-17.43) | < 0.001 | 2.66 (0.44-19.64) | < 0.001 | 0.97 (0.79-0.99) | 0.041 | 0.05 (0.015-0.87) | 0.11 | 0.69 (0.59-0.97) | 0.007 |
| F2-4 | 11.94 (6.4-44.87) | 11.78 (1.39-200.76) | 0.94 (0.66-0.98) | 0.034 (0.003-0.33) | 0.61 (0.33-0.87) | ||||||
| F0-2 | F0-2 | 9.03 (4.07-17.43) | < 0.001 | 3.39 (0.44-27.43) | 0.002 | 0.96 (0.79-0.99) | 0.23 | 0.049 (0.012-0.87) | 0.11 | 0.68 (0.50-0.97) | 0.044 |
| F3-4 | 14.97 (9.00-44.87) | 14.86 (1.39-200.76) | 0.94 (0.67-0.98) | 0.030 (0.003-0.33) | 0.59 (0.33-0.87) | ||||||
| F0-3 | F0-3 | 9.42 (4.07-22.23) | 0.004 | 3.69 (0.44-67.49) | < 0.001 | 0.96 (0.74-0.99) | 0.29 | 0.05 (0.012-0.87) | 0.018 | 0.68 (0.50-0.97) | 0.018 |
| F4 | 17.30 (9.00-44.87) | 90.43 (9.34-200.76) | 0.93 (0.67-0.98) | 0.019 (0.003-0.094) | 0.50 (0.33-0.69) | ||||||
2D-SWE: Two dimensional shear wave elastography; ASM: Angular second moment.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic curves. A: F0 vs F1-4 (≥ F1); B: F0-1 vs F2-4 (≥ F2); C: F0-2 vs F3-4 (≥ F3); D: F0-3 vs F4 (F4). SWE: Shear wave elastography; ASM: Angular second moment; PRE: Predictive value.
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of various indicators in diagnosing pathological stages of liver fibrosis
| F0 | AUC (95%CI) | 0.823 (0.678-0.921) | 0.906 (0.779-0.973) | 0.533 (0.377-0.685) | 0.659 (0.500-0.795) | 0.789 (0.639-0.897) | 0.952 (0.841-0.994) |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.735 | 0.09 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||
| YI | 0.533 | 0.697 | 0.195 | 0.363 | 0.448 | 0.761 | |
| Cutoff | > 5.967 | > 2.726 | ≤ 0.899 | ≤ 0.0940 | ≤ 0.632 | > 0.591 | |
| TPR (%) | 100.0 | 89.7 | 13.8 | 89.7 | 44.8 | 82.8 | |
| TNR (%) | 53.3 | 80.0 | 66.7 | 46.7 | 100.0 | 93.3 | |
| F0-1 | AUC (95%CI) | 0.808 (0.662-0.911) | 0.835 (0.693-0.930) | 0.680 (0.523-0.813) | 0.641 (0.482-0.780) | 0.736 (0.582-0.858) | 0.896 (0.766-0.967) |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.0267 | 0.0936 | 0.0023 | < 0.0001 | ||
| YI | 0.483 | 0.567 | 0.358 | 0.258 | 0.508 | 0.767 | |
| Cutoff | > 8.667 | > 7.391 | ≤ 0.973 | ≤ 0.0350 | ≤ 0.617 | > 0.440 | |
| TPR (%) | 90.0 | 65.0 | 90.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 85.0 | |
| TNR (%) | 58.3 | 91.7 | 45.8 | 70.8 | 95.8 | 91.7 | |
| F0-2 | AUC (95%CI) | 0.920 (0.798-0.980) | 0.807 (0.660-0.910) | 0.624 (0.465-0.765) | 0.663 (0.504-0.798) | 0.705 (0.549-0.883) | 0.978 (0.881-0.999) |
| < 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.21 | 0.107 | 0.0392 | < 0.0001 | ||
| YI | 0.818 | 0.546 | 0.273 | 0.363 | 0.485 | 0.939 | |
| Cutoff | > 11.033 | > 8.385 | ≤ 0.938 | ≤ 0.0330 | ≤ 0.587 | > 0.124 | |
| TPR (%) | 90.9 | 72.7 | 54.6 | 63.6 | 54.6 | 100.0 | |
| TNR (%) | 90.9 | 81.8 | 72.7 | 72.7 | 93.9 | 93.9 | |
| F0-3 | AUC (95%CI) | 0.855 (0.716-0.943) | 0.925 (0.805-0.983) | 0.638 (0.480- 0.777) | 0.796 (0.648-0.902) | 0.798 (0.650-0.904) | 0.947 (0.835-0.992) |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.272 | 0.0058 | 0.0058 | < 0.0001 | ||
| YI | 0.702 | 0.790 | 0.377 | 0.597 | 0.561 | 0.807 | |
| Cutoff | > 13.000 | > 8.385 | ≤ 0.938 | ≤ 0.030 | ≤ 0.587 | > 0.383 | |
| TPR (%) | 83.3 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 83.3 | 66.7 | 83.3 | |
| TNR (%) | 86.8 | 79.0 | 71.1 | 76.3 | 89.5 | 97.4 | |
There is statistically significance when compared with two dimensional shear wave elastography group (P < 0.05).
PRE: Predictive value of combined diagnosis; AUC: The area under the ROC curve; YI: Youden index; Cutoff: The diagnostic cut-off point; TPR: The true positive rate; TNR: The true negative rate.