| Literature DB >> 31182704 |
Lin Zhou1, Shihui Ma1,2, Alpha Ibrahima Balde1, Shuai Han1, Zhai Cai1, Zhou Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND A retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between the CRP to albumin ratio and prognosis in patients with resectable non-metastatic breast cancer in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using propensity score matching. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed resectable non-metastatic breast cancer (n=200) who underwent modified radical mastectomy between January 2008 to June 2013 included a group with an increased CRP to albumin ratio ≥0.029 (n=80) and a group with reduced CRP to albumin ratio <0.029 (n=120). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the prognostic role of the CRP to albumin ratio, and a 1: 1 matching using four covariates was performed to overcome selection bias. The prognostic significance of the CRP to albumin ratio was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were conducted to identify the impact on DFS and OS. RESULTS An increased CRP to albumin ratio was associated with increased age, post-menopausal status, and a high risk of recurrence or death in patients with breast cancer. An increased preoperative CRP to albumin ratio was significantly associated with reduced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that an increased CRP to albumin ratio was an independent risk factor for long-term outcome and predicted reduced DFS (HR, 2.225; P=0.024) and OS (HR, 9.189; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative evaluation of the CRP to albumin ratio was an independent prognostic indicator in patients with resectable breast cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31182704 PMCID: PMC6582690 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.913684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Clinicopathological characteristic of breast cancer patients associated with a low and high C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR).
| Characteristic | Before propensity score matching (n=200) | Before propensity score matching (n=160) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR <0.029 (n=120) | CAR ≥0.029 (n=80) | P-value | CAR <0.029 | CAR ≥0.029 | P-value | |
| (n=80) | (n=80) | |||||
| Age group (yrs) | 0.154 | |||||
| ≤50 | 68 | 33 | 42 | 33 | ||
| >50 | 52 | 47 | 38 | 47 | ||
| Menopausal status | 0.113 | |||||
| Premenopausal | 72 | 33 | 43 | 33 | ||
| Postmenopausal | 48 | 47 | 37 | 47 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.84±2.61 | 20.42±2.42 | 0.261 | 21.29±2.07 | 20.41±2.42 | |
| Tumor classification | 0.346 | 0.331 | ||||
| T1 | 51 | 26 | 35 | 26 | ||
| T2 | 66 | 51 | 43 | 51 | ||
| T3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| LN metastasis | 0.078 | |||||
| N0 | 80 | 39 | 54 | 39 | ||
| N1 | 20 | 19 | 12 | 19 | ||
| N2 | 16 | 16 | 13 | 16 | ||
| N3 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Vascular and neural invasion | 0.827 | 0.440 | ||||
| No | 96 | 65 | 61 | 65 | ||
| Yes | 24 | 15 | 19 | 15 | ||
| TNM staging | 0.142 | 0.342 | ||||
| I | 40 | 18 | 26 | 18 | ||
| II | 63 | 44 | 40 | 44 | ||
| III | 17 | 18 | 14 | 18 | ||
| Histological grade | 0.194 | 0.539 | ||||
| G1 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 12 | ||
| G2 | 81 | 53 | 56 | 53 | ||
| G3 | 13 | 15 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Histological type | 0.456 | 0.263 | ||||
| IDC | 109 | 75 | 71 | 75 | ||
| Others | 11 | 5 | 9 | 5 | ||
| ER status | 0.597 | 0.521 | ||||
| Positive | 69 | 49 | 45 | 49 | ||
| Negative | 51 | 31 | 35 | 31 | ||
| PR status | 0.817 | 0.635 | ||||
| Positive | 65 | 38 | 39 | 42 | ||
| Negative | 55 | 38 | 41 | 38 | ||
| HER2 status | 0.238 | 0.056 | ||||
| Positive | 34 | 29 | 18 | 29 | ||
| Negative | 86 | 51 | 62 | 51 | ||
| Ki67 | 0.096 | 0.440 | ||||
| Positive | 85 | 65 | 61 | 65 | ||
| Negative | 35 | 15 | 19 | 15 | ||
| Endocrinotherapy | 0.728 | 0.343 | ||||
| Yes | 63 | 44 | 38 | 44 | ||
| No | 57 | 36 | 42 | 36 | ||
| Targeted therapy | 0.431 | 0.292 | ||||
| Yes | 13 | 6 | 10 | 6 | ||
| No | 107 | 74 | 70 | 74 | ||
| Chemotherapy | 0.640 | 0.772 | ||||
| Yes | 113 | 74 | 73 | 74 | ||
| No | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | ||
| Radiotherapy | 0.105 | 0.063 | ||||
| Yes | 24 | 24 | 14 | 24 | ||
| No | 96 | 56 | 66 | 56 | ||
| Recurrence/metastasis | ||||||
| Yes | 19 | 28 | 13 | 28 | ||
| No | 101 | 52 | 67 | 52 | ||
| Metastasis sites | 0.002 | |||||
| Liver | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | ||
| Brain | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Lung | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6 | ||
| Bone | 8 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||
| Others | 7 | 14 | 5 | 14 | ||
| Death | ||||||
| Yes | 4 | 17 | 2 | 17 | ||
| No | 116 | 63 | 78 | 63 | ||
| NLR | 2.48±1.14 | 2.47±1.36 | 0.983 | 2.53±1.17 | 2.47±1.36 | 0.782 |
| PLR | 159.57±57.43 | 152.76+66.62 | 0.442 | 161.22±64.67 | 152.76±66.62 | 0.416 |
| GPS | 0.085 | |||||
| 0 | 118 | 71 | 78 | 71 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
CAR – C-reactive protein to albumin ratio; LN – lymph node; TNM – tumor-node-metastasis; IDC – infiltrative ductal carcinoma; ER – estrogen receptor; PR – progesterone receptor; HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Values are shown as the means ± standard deviations.
Bold values indicate statistical significance; GPS – Glasgow prognostic score; PLR – platelet to lymphocyte ratio; NLR – neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 1Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio for survival status of breast cancer patients. ROC – receiver operating characteristic; CI – confidence interval; CAR – C-reactive protein/albumin ratio; PLR – platelet to lymphocyte ratio; NLR – neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; GPS – Glasgow prognostic ccore.
Figure 2Disease-free survival (DFS) after propensity score matching. CAR – C-reactive protein/albumin ratio.
Figure 3Overall survival (OS) after propensity score matching. CAR – C-reactive protein/albumin ratio.
Univariate Cox regression analyses of risk factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after propensity score matching.
| Characteristic | DFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤50 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| >50 | 0.728 | (0.394–1.345) | 0.311 | 0.958 | (0.389–2.358) | 0.925 |
| Menopausal status | ||||||
| Premenopausal | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Postmenopausal | 0.687 | (0.372–1.272) | 0.232 | 0.918 | (0.373–2.263) | 0.853 |
| Tumor classification | ||||||
| T1 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| T2 | 1.392 | (0.715–1.392) | 0.331 | 1.093 | (0.423–2.822)) | 0.854 |
| T3 | 5.023 | (1.113–22.673) | 3.632 | (0.438–30.115) | 0.232 | |
| LN metastasis | ||||||
| N0 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| N1 | 2.329 | (1.033–5.250) | 0.724 | (0.156–3.358) | 0.680 | |
| N2 | 3.376 | (1.586–7.189) | 1.547 | (0.476–5.026) | 0.468 | |
| N3 | 10.258 | (3.301–31.876) | 14.275 | (4.236–48.103) | ||
| Vascular and neural invasion | ||||||
| Yes | 1.314 | (0.625–2.762) | 0.472 | 1.173 | (0.388–3.544) | 0.777 |
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Histological grade | ||||||
| G1 | ref | Ref | ||||
| G2 | 1.010 | (0.442–2.309) | 0.980 | 0.795 | (0.259–2.444) | 0.689 |
| G3 | 0.871 | (0.275–2.758) | 0.814 | 0.596 | (0.109–3.264) | 0.551 |
| Histological type | ||||||
| IDC | 2.354 | (0.566–9.792) | 0.239 | 23.393 | (0.026–2.385) | 0.365 |
| Others | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ER status | ||||||
| Positive | 1.384 | (0.729–2.627) | 0.320 | 1.327 | (0.522–3.376) | 0.553 |
| Negative | Ref | Ref | ||||
| PR status | ||||||
| Positive | 1.276 | (0.685–2.376) | 0.443 | 1.326 | (0.533–3.297) | 0.544 |
| Negative | Ref | Ref | ||||
| HER2 status | ||||||
| Positive | 1.345 | (0.695–2.603) | 0.378 | 0.991 | (0.357–2.757) | 0.987 |
| Negative | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Ki67 | ||||||
| Positive | 1.258 | (0.580–2.726) | 0.561 | 1.511 | (0.440–5.188) | 0.512 |
| Negative | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Endocrinotherapy | ||||||
| Yes | 1.681 | (0.895–3.158) | 0.106 | 1.764 | (0.693–4.487) | 0.234 |
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Targeted therapy | ||||||
| Yes | 0.660 | (0.204–2.140) | 0.489 | 0.429 | (0.057–3.214) | 0.410 |
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Chemotherapy | ||||||
| Yes | 0.974 | (0.301–3.159) | 0.966 | 0.442 | (0.129–1.520) | 0.195 |
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Radiotherapy | ||||||
| Yes | 3.738 | (2.000–6.988) | 1.096 | (0.362–3.316) | 0.871 | |
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| CAR | ||||||
| <0.029 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥0.029 | 2.592 | (1.340–5.013) | 10.200 | (2.353–44.229) | ||
CAR – C-reactive protein to albumin ratio; OS – overall survival; DFS – disease-free survival; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval; LN – lymph node; ER – estrogen receptor; PR – progesterone receptor; HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Ref – reference. Bold values indicate statistical significance.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of risk factors related to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after propensity score matching.
| Characteristic | DFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
| Tumor classification | ||||||
| T1 | Ref | |||||
| T2 | 1.016 | (0.506–2.042) | 0.964 | |||
| T3 | 2.789 | (0.508–15.311) | 0.238 | |||
| LN metastasis | ||||||
| N0 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| N1 | 1.514 | (0.614–3.730) | 0.368 | 0.493 | (0.106–2.296) | 0.367 |
| N2 | 2.038 | (0.78–5.317) | 0.145 | 1.254 | (0.385–4.086) | 0.707 |
| N3 | 3.678 | (0.894–15.127) | 0.071 | 7.974 | (2.355–26.998) | |
| Radiotherapy | ||||||
| Yes | 1.958 | (0.870–4.409) | 0.105 | |||
| No | Ref | |||||
| CAR | ||||||
| <0.029 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥0.029 | 2.225 | (1.113–4.451) | 9.189 | (2.079–40.621) | ||
CAR – C-reactive protein to albumin ratio; OS – overall survival; DFS – disease-free survival; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval; LN – lymph node; ref – reference. Bold values indicate statistical significance.