| Literature DB >> 31181843 |
Monica Luminita Badea1, Simona Liliana Iconaru2, Andreea Groza3, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc4,5, Mircea Beuran6,7, Daniela Predoi8.
Abstract
This study aimed at developing an antimicrobial material based on hydroxyapatite (HAp) and peppermint essential oil (P-EO) in order to stimulate the antimicrobial activity of hydroxyapatite. The molecular spectral features and morphology of the P-EO, HAp and hydroxyapatite coated with peppermint essential oil (HAp-P) were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The coating of the HAp with the P-EO did not affect the ellipsoidal shape of the nanoparticles. The overlapping of IR bands of P-EO and HAp in the HAp-P spectrum determined the formation of the broad molecular bands that were observed in the spectral regions of 400-1000 cm-1 and 1000-1200 cm-1. The antibacterial activity of the P-EO, HAp and HAp-P were also tested against different Gram-positive bacteria (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 388, S. aureus ATCC 25923, S. aureus ATCC 6538, E. faecium DSM 13590), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli C5, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027) and a fungal strain of Candida parapsilosis. The results of the present study revealed that the antimicrobial activity of HAp-P increased significantly over that of HAp.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial properties; hydroxyapatite; peppermint essential oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31181843 PMCID: PMC6600389 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24112169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1XRD pattern of HAp powder.
Figure 2SEM images of (a) HAp and (b) HAp-P, and particle size distributions of (c) HAp and (d) HAp-P samples.
Figure 3FTIR spectrum of (a) HAp, (b) HAp-P (c) and P-EO samples; FTIR spectra from of HAp sample from 2500 to 4000 cm−1 (a’).
The diameters of inhibition growth zones (mm).
| Microbial Strains | P-EO | HAp-P | HAp | DMSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.2 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| 20 ± 0.3 | 7 ± 0.3 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| 10 ± 0.5 | 7 ± 0.5 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| 11 ± 0.3 | 6 ± 0.2 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| 12 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 0.5 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| 8 ± 0.2 | 7 ± 0.6 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 388 | 10 ± 0.5 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 |
| 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | |
| 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 | 0 ± 0.1 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values obtained for DMSO, HAp, P-EO and HAp-P.
| Microbial Strains | P-EO | HAp-P | HAp | DMSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.25 ± 0.1 | 250 ± 1.4 | >250 ± 1.5 | >250 ± 1.6 | |
| 31.25 ± 0.5 | 250 ± 1.7 | >250 ± 1.5 | >250 ± 1.8 | |
| 31.25 ± 0.5 | 31.25 ± 0.5 | >250 ± 1.6 | >250 ± 1.6 | |
| 31.25 ± 0.7 | 31.25 ± 0.5 | >250 ± 1.9 | >250 ± 1.5 | |
| 31.25 ± 0.3 | 250 ± 1.8 | >250 ± 1.2 | >250 ± 1.9 | |
| 31.25 ± 0.7 | 250 ± 1.7 | >250 ± 1.5 | >250 ± 1.3 | |
| Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 388 | 31.25 ± 0.5 | 250 ± 1.5 | >250 ± 1.8 | >250 ± 1.6 |
| 62.5 ± 1.2 | 125 ± 0.5 | >250 ± 1.4 | >250 ± 1.7 | |
| 15.62 ± 0.3 | 31.25 ± 0.6 | 250 ± 1.5 | 250 ± 1.5 |
Figure 4DiBAC4(3) staining (log fluorescence) of (a) Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, (b) Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, (c) Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, (d) Enterococcus faecium DSM 13590 and (e) Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019. Part of the fluorescent depolarized bacteria with increased green fluorescence caused by an accumulation of the dye inside the microbial cell, expressed in percentages.
The percentage of depolarized bacterial cells treated with the selected plant EO and Hap and coated with plant EOs at MIC values.
| Microbial Strains | P-EO | HAp-P | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | 32.2% | 0.0% | |
| 0.1% | 57.3% | 0.0% | |
| 13.3% | 27.9% | 0.6% | |
| 14.8% | 1.6% | 0.3% | |
| 17.1% | 1.5% | 1.3% |