Literature DB >> 31181352

Benzylpenicillin versus flucloxacillin for penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections from a large retrospective cohort study.

A Henderson1, P Harris2, G Hartel3, D Paterson4, J Turnidge5, J S Davis6, S Y C Tong7.   

Abstract

In clinical practice, differing opinions exists regarding the optimal management of patients with penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bloodstream infection (BSI). The aim of this study was to compare the 30-day mortality of patients treated with benzylpenicillin or flucloxacillin for PSSA BSI from a large prospectively collected data set from Australia and New Zealand. A logistic regression model and propensity score treatment analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting were used. A total of 915 patients were included in the study, with an overall mortality rate of 12.9% (118/915) [benzylpenicillin 10.5% (33/315) and flucloxacillin 14.2% (85/600)]. Endocarditis was associated with benzylpenicillin treatment choice, whereas skin and soft-tissue infection was associated with flucloxacillin treatment choice. In the multivariate analysis, increased 30-day mortality was associated with flucloxacillin compared with benzylpenicillin [odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.5; P = 0.05). When adjusted for treatment choice in the propensity score analysis, flucloxacillin was again associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.1; P = 0.03). An increase in 30-day mortality associated with flucloxacillin use suggests a potential benefit for benzylpenicillin therapy in patients with PSSA BSI. Crown
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteraemia; Benzylpenicillin; Bloodstream infection; Flucloxacillin; Penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31181352     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  5 in total

1.  Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Possible misinterpretation of penicillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus blood isolate due to in vitro loss of the blaZ gene.

Authors:  Helle Brander Eriksen; Andreas Petersen; Michael Pedersen; Søren Overballe-Petersen; Anders Rhod Larsen; Barbara Juliane Holzknecht
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Genomic epidemiology and characterisation of penicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates from invasive bloodstream infections in China: an increasing prevalence and higher diversity in genetic typing be revealed.

Authors:  Ye Jin; Wangxiao Zhou; Qing Zhan; Yunbo Chen; Qixia Luo; Ping Shen; Yonghong Xiao
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 7.163

Review 4.  Emerging Treatment Options for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Bloodstream Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Silvia Dettori; Silvia Corcione; Antonio Vena; Chiara Sepulcri; Alberto Enrico Maraolo; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Molecular Epidemiology of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Australia and Reliability of Diagnostic Phenotypic Susceptibility Methods to Detect Penicillin Susceptibility.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Coombs; Nicholas W T Yee; Denise Daley; Catherine M Bennett; James O Robinson; Marc Stegger; Princy Shoby; Shakeel Mowlaboccus
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.