Literature DB >> 31180766

The direct superior approach in total hip arthroplasty.

Babar Kayani1, Sujith Konan2, Raja Chandramohan3, Fares S Haddad4.   

Abstract

The direct superior approach is a modification of the minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty which preserves the iliotibial band and external rotators except for the piriformis or conjoint tendon. This review explores the existing scientific evidence on clinical, functional and radiological outcomes in total hip arthroplasty performed using the direct superior approach. The direct superior approach reduces iatrogenic periarticular soft tissue injury compared to the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. The learning curve for the direct superior approach is 40 operative cases with operative times comparable to those of conventional approaches for total hip arthroplasty after surgical proficiency has been achieved. The direct superior approach provides improvements in pain and short-term functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty as assessed using the Harris Hip Score. The minimally invasive posterior approach provides comparable pain scores and improved University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale functional scores to the direct superior approach at 1-year follow up. Existing studies using plain radiographs have shown that the direct superior approach enables accurate femoral and acetabular implant positioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31180766     DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2019.80.6.320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1750-8460            Impact factor:   0.825


  5 in total

1.  No Learning Curve of the Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bouke J Duijnisveld; Joost A A M van den Hout; Robert Wagenmakers; Koen L M Koenraadt; Stefan B T Bolder
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  The direct superior approach versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective double-blinded randomised control trial.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Atif Ayuob; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nikolai Ramadanov; Simon Bueschges; Kuiliang Liu; Roman Klein; Ruediger Schultka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Direct anterior approach (DAA) vs. conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty: A RCT meta-analysis with an overview of related meta-analyses.

Authors:  Philip Lazaru; Simon Bueschges; Nikolai Ramadanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Clinical efficacy of direct anterior approach vs. other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on RCTs.

Authors:  Zhongsheng Zhou; Yang Li; Yachen Peng; Jinlan Jiang; Jianlin Zuo
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.