Joshua G Scott1,2, Erin Shore1,2, Carol Brown1,2, Carisa Harris3,4, Mitchel A Rosen5. 1. Center for Health, Work & Environment at the Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado. 2. University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. 3. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California. 4. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California. 5. Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of trained Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) professionals able to meet the current and future demand for such expertize in the United States. Many OSH professionals are required to perform duties, which are outside of their primary area of expertize; thus, expansion of continuing education (CE) may be necessary to properly train individuals for new OSH responsibilities. METHODS: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-funded Education and Research Centers collectively developed and distributed an internet-based survey to gauge the CE needs and interests of the OSH workforce. RESULTS: A total of 2064 responses were received. The most common primary professions represented were safety (28%), occupational health nursing (18%), and industrial hygiene (12%). The majority of respondents (61%) reported that they perform work activities outside of those associated with their primary OSH profession. The CE offerings with the highest interest among respondents were related to safety. Other courses with high levels of interest included topics such as legal issues in OSH (88%), compliance (88%), risk management (85%), OSH management (83%), risk communication (83%), and communication in accident prevention (81%). Health and safety leadership (82%), health and safety culture (78%) and total worker health (74%) were also significant interests. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to be responsive to the evolving needs of the OS&H community. Developing relevant courses will help ensure that OS&H professionals have access to the training they need to perform essential job functions and keep employees healthy and safe.
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of trained Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) professionals able to meet the current and future demand for such expertize in the United States. Many OSH professionals are required to perform duties, which are outside of their primary area of expertize; thus, expansion of continuing education (CE) may be necessary to properly train individuals for new OSH responsibilities. METHODS: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-funded Education and Research Centers collectively developed and distributed an internet-based survey to gauge the CE needs and interests of the OSH workforce. RESULTS: A total of 2064 responses were received. The most common primary professions represented were safety (28%), occupational health nursing (18%), and industrial hygiene (12%). The majority of respondents (61%) reported that they perform work activities outside of those associated with their primary OSH profession. The CE offerings with the highest interest among respondents were related to safety. Other courses with high levels of interest included topics such as legal issues in OSH (88%), compliance (88%), risk management (85%), OSH management (83%), risk communication (83%), and communication in accident prevention (81%). Health and safety leadership (82%), health and safety culture (78%) and total worker health (74%) were also significant interests. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to be responsive to the evolving needs of the OS&H community. Developing relevant courses will help ensure that OS&H professionals have access to the training they need to perform essential job functions and keep employees healthy and safe.
Authors: Trevor K Peckham; Marissa G Baker; Janice E Camp; Joel D Kaufman; Noah S Seixas Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Lee S Newman; Joshua G Scott; Adele Childress; Laura Linnan; Wilbert J Newhall; Deborah L McLellan; Shelly Campo; Sabrina Freewynn; Leslie B Hammer; Maija Leff; Gretchen Macy; Elizabeth H Maples; Bonnie Rogers; Diane S Rohlman; Liliana Tenney; Cecilia Watkins Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.306