Literature DB >> 31180512

Combination therapy with mandibular advancement and expiratory positive airway pressure valves reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity.

Victor Lai1,2, Benjamin K Tong1,2, Carolin Tran1, Andrea Ricciardiello1, Michelle Donegan1, Nicholas P Murray3, Jayne C Carberry1,2,4, Danny J Eckert1,2,4.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy is a well-tolerated alternative to continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Other therapies, including nasal expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) valves, can also reduce OSA severity. However, >50% of patients have an incomplete or no therapeutic response with either therapy alone and thus remain at risk of adverse health outcomes. Combining these therapies may yield greater efficacy to provide a therapeutic solution for many incomplete/nonresponders to MAS therapy. Thus, this study evaluated the efficacy of combination therapy with MAS plus EPAP in incomplete/nonresponders to MAS alone.
METHODS: Twenty-two people with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] = 22 [13, 42] events/hr), who were incomplete/nonresponders (residual AHI > 5 events/hr) on an initial split-night polysomnography with a novel MAS device containing an oral airway, completed an additional split-night polysomnography with MAS + oral EPAP valve and MAS + oral and nasal EPAP valves (order randomized).
RESULTS: Compared with MAS alone, MAS + oral EPAP significantly reduced the median total AHI, with further reductions with the MAS + oral/nasal EPAP combination (15 [10, 34] vs. 10 [7, 21] vs. 7 [3, 13] events/hr, p < 0.01). Larger reductions occurred in supine nonrapid eye movement AHI with MAS + oral/nasal EPAP combination therapy (ΔAHI = 23 events/hr, p < 0.01). OSA resolved (AHI < 5 events/hr) with MAS + oral/nasal EPAP in nine individuals and 13 had ≥50% reduction in AHI from no MAS. However, sleep efficiency was lower with MAS + oral/nasal EPAP versus MAS alone or MAS + oral EPAP (78 ± 19 vs. 87 ± 10 and 88 ± 10% respectively, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with a novel MAS device and simple oral or oro-nasal EPAP valves reduces OSA severity to therapeutic levels for a substantial proportion of incomplete/nonresponders to MAS therapy alone. CLINICAL TRIALS: Name: Targeted combination therapy: Physiological mechanistic studies to inform treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372279 Registration: ACTRN12617000492358 (Part C). © Sleep Research Society 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental sleep medicine; nasal resistance; non-CPAP therapies; sleep-disordered breathing; upper airway

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31180512     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsz119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  3 in total

1.  Making Sense of the Noise: Toward Rational Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Eric J Kezirian; Michael Simmons; Richard J Schwab; Peter Cistulli; Kasey K Li; Edward M Weaver; Andrew N Goldberg; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Clinical and Research Solutions to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review.

Authors:  Fen Xia; Mohamad Sawan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.