Literature DB >> 31179500

Blood Pressure, Chronic Kidney Disease Progression, and Kidney Allograft Failure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Secondary Analysis of the FAVORIT Trial.

Rakesh Malhotra1,2, Ronit Katz3, Daniel E Weiner4, Andrew S Levey4, Alfred K Cheung5,6, Andrew G Bostom7, Joachim H Ix1,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In chronic kidney disease, intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control reduces mortality at a cost of greater acute kidney injury risk. Kidney transplantation involves implantation of denervated kidneys and immunosuppressive medications that increase acute kidney injury risk. The optimal blood pressure (BP) target in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is uncertain. Prior observational studies from the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation (FAVORIT) trial demonstrate associations of lower SBP levels and reduced mortality risk, but the relationship of BP with kidney allograft function remains unknown. Thus, in FAVORIT, we investigated the relationship of SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with risk of kidney allograft failure and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope among stable KTRs.
METHODS: Cox proportional hazards and multivariable linear regression models adjusted for demographics, transplant characteristics, comorbidities, baseline eGFR, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio were used to determine associations of SBP and DBP with time to a composite kidney outcome of ≥50% eGFR decline or dialysis dependence, and with annualized eGFR change, respectively. Multivariable restricted cubic spline plots were developed to evaluate the functional form of the relationships.
RESULTS: Among 3,598 KTRs, mean age was 52 ± 9 years, SBP was 136 ± 20 mm Hg, DBP was 79 ± 12 mm Hg, and eGFR was 49 ± 18 ml/minute/1.73 m2. There were 369 events of ≥50% eGFR decline or dialysis dependence during a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 1.5 years. There was no association of either SBP (compared with SBP 120 to <130 mm Hg, hazard ratio (HR) for the SBP < 110 was 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.70) and 130 to <140 was 0.89 (0.64 to 1.24)) or DBP (compared with DBP 70 to <80 mm Hg, HR for the DBP 60 to <70 was 1.00 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.34) and 80 to <90 was 0.90 (0.68 to 1.18)) with the kidney failure outcome or annualized eGFR slope, and, when examined using restricted cubic splines, there was no evidence of "J"- or "U"-shaped relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large sample of stable KTRs, we found no evidence of thresholds at which lower BPs were related to higher risk of allograft failure or eGFR decline. In light of prior findings of mortality benefit at low SBP, these observational findings suggest lower BP may be beneficial in KTRs. This important question requires confirmation in future randomized trials in KTRs. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2019. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allograft dysfunction; blood pressure; estimated glomerular filtration; hypertension; kidney transplant

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31179500      PMCID: PMC6694012          DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpz095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  18 in total

1.  Blood pressure and mortality in U.S. veterans with chronic kidney disease: a cohort study.

Authors:  Csaba P Kovesdy; Anthony J Bleyer; Miklos Z Molnar; Jennie Z Ma; John J Sim; William C Cushman; L Darryl Quarles; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Improved long-term outcomes after renal transplantation associated with blood pressure control.

Authors:  Gerhard Opelz; Bernd Döhler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Rationale and design of the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction In Transplantation (FAVORIT) trial.

Authors:  Andrew G Bostom; Myra A Carpenter; John W Kusek; Lawrence G Hunsicker; Marc A Pfeffer; Andrew S Levey; Paul F Jacques; Joyce McKenney
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Effect of hypertension on transplant kidney function: three year of follow-up.

Authors:  G A Raiss Jalali; A Fazelzadeh; A R Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Blood pressure and the survival of renal allografts from living donors.

Authors:  Kevin C Mange; Harold I Feldman; Marshall M Joffe; Kosunarty Fa; Roy D Bloom
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation (FAVORIT) Trial.

Authors:  Andrew G Bostom; Myra A Carpenter; Lawrence Hunsicker; Paul F Jacques; John W Kusek; Andrew S Levey; Joyce L McKenney; Renee Y Mercier; Marc A Pfeffer; Jacob Selhub
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Hypertension after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Shakeel Anjum; Rajiv Shah; Jeffrey Skogen; Chitra Kandaswamy; Barbara Danielson; Eileen A O'Shaughnessy; David C Dahl; John R Silkensen; Meena Sahadevan; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antihypertensive Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients-A Current Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Ulrich Jehn; Katharina Schütte-Nütgen; Markus Strauss; Jan Kunert; Hermann Pavenstädt; Gerold Thölking; Barbara Suwelack; Stefan Reuter
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.