Nichole L Hodges1, Abigail B Shoben2,3, Electra D Paskett3,4,5, Mira L Katz1,3,4. 1. Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 2. Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 3. Comprehensive Cancer Center, at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 4. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, College of Medicine, at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 5. Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low, especially among low-income populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a CRC screening intervention (video, brochure) improves knowledge about CRC and CRC screening, attitudes toward screening, and intention to complete CRC screening among average-risk adults with different health literacy skills, seeking medical care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). METHODS: Average-risk adults (50 years or older) who were not within CRC screening guidelines completed face-to-face pre-and post-intervention interviews that focused on knowledge about CRC and CRC screening, attitudes toward CRC screening, and intention to complete CRC screening. RESULTS: Of the 270 participants, 64% were women, 72% were black/African American, 86% were not married, 79% had an annual household income of <$20,000, and 57% did not have health insurance. Reading levels by Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine health literacy test were: 3rd grade or lower, 17 participants (6.3%); 4th-6th grade, 27 (10.0%); 7th-8th grade, 101 (37.4 %); and high school, 125 (46.3%). CRC screening knowledge mean score improved, and perceived CRC susceptibility and self-efficacy to complete screening significantly increased, irrespective of health literacy (all P < .01). There were no significant changes in other attitudes or intention to complete screening. LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted in a single FQHC, so the results may not be generalizable to other health centers or populations of low-income and minority patients. CONCLUSION: A CRC screening intervention improved CRC screening knowledge and attitudes across levels of health literacy and may be an important strategy for improving CRC screening in the primary care setting. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute K07 CA107079 (Ohio State University) and P30 CA016058 (Behavioral Measurement Shared Resource at The Ohio State University).
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low, especially among low-income populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a CRC screening intervention (video, brochure) improves knowledge about CRC and CRC screening, attitudes toward screening, and intention to complete CRC screening among average-risk adults with different health literacy skills, seeking medical care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). METHODS: Average-risk adults (50 years or older) who were not within CRC screening guidelines completed face-to-face pre-and post-intervention interviews that focused on knowledge about CRC and CRC screening, attitudes toward CRC screening, and intention to complete CRC screening. RESULTS: Of the 270 participants, 64% were women, 72% were black/African American, 86% were not married, 79% had an annual household income of <$20,000, and 57% did not have health insurance. Reading levels by Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine health literacy test were: 3rd grade or lower, 17 participants (6.3%); 4th-6th grade, 27 (10.0%); 7th-8th grade, 101 (37.4 %); and high school, 125 (46.3%). CRC screening knowledge mean score improved, and perceived CRC susceptibility and self-efficacy to complete screening significantly increased, irrespective of health literacy (all P < .01). There were no significant changes in other attitudes or intention to complete screening. LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted in a single FQHC, so the results may not be generalizable to other health centers or populations of low-income and minority patients. CONCLUSION: A CRC screening intervention improved CRC screening knowledge and attitudes across levels of health literacy and may be an important strategy for improving CRC screening in the primary care setting. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute K07 CA107079 (Ohio State University) and P30 CA016058 (Behavioral Measurement Shared Resource at The Ohio State University).
Authors: Jane G Zapka; Stephenie C Lemon; Elaine Puleo; Barbara Estabrook; Roger Luckmann; Stephen Erban Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-11-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Karen Emmons; Mary Kay Hunt; Elizabeth Barbeau; Roberta Goldman; Karen Peterson; Karen Kuntz; Anne Stoddard; Lisa Berkman Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Nancy C Dolan; M Rosario Ferreira; Terry C Davis; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Alfred Rademaker; Dachao Liu; Brian P Schmitt; Nicolle Gorby; Michael Wolf; Charles L Bennett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544