| Literature DB >> 31179167 |
Joanna Pilczynska1,2, Silvia Cocito3, Joana Boavida4,5, Ester A Serrão4, Jorge Assis4, Eliza Fragkopoulou4, Henrique Queiroga1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the ocean, the variability of environmental conditions found along depth gradients exposes populations to contrasting levels of perturbation, which can be reflected in the overall patterns of species genetic diversity. At shallow sites, resource availability may structure large, persistent and well-connected populations with higher levels of diversity. In contrast, the more extreme conditions, such as thermal stress during heat waves, can lead to population bottlenecks and genetic erosion, inverting the natural expectation. Here we examine how genetic diversity varies along depth for a long-lived, important ecosystem-structuring species, the red gorgonian, Paramuricea clavata.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic Ocean; Climate change; Depth refugia; Genetic diversity; Mediterranean Sea; Paramuricea clavata
Year: 2019 PMID: 31179167 PMCID: PMC6536111 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Sampling sites of the red gorgonian (Paramuricea clavata) populations in the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea.
The exact coordinates of each sampling site are available in the supplementary information (S3). Map source “©OpenStreetMap contributors”, available under the Open Database License. This figure is published under CC BY SA: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.
Figure 2Genetic diversity (mean ± SD) as (A) allelic richness, (B) private alleles and (C) expected heterozygosity of Paramuricea clavata in shallow (light grey) and deeper (dark grey) populations.
Asterisks indicate significant differences in diversity levels (P < 0.05). Sampling site name, depth (m) and number of samples (n) are described for each population.
Summary of linear regression models testing genetic diversity indices against depth and a set of environmental predictors.
Akaike Information Criterion, R-squared and p-value scores are shown for each model. Bold represents higher values when comparisons were made.
| Allelic richness | Private alleles | Expected heterozygosity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model type | Predictors | AIC | AIC | AIC | ||||||
| Null | Depth | 71.05 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 92.84 | 0.60 | 0.01 | −35.26 | 0.01 | 0.77 |
| Environmental | Model effect | |||||||||
| Min. current velocity | 0.98 | 0.45 | 0.29 | |||||||
| Min. productivity | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.81 | |||||||
| Slope | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.13 | |||||||
| Max. temperature | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.53 | |||||||
Figure 3Partial dependence functions depicting the effect of bottom temperature on (A) allelic richness, (B) private alleles and (C) expected heterozygosity.
Figure 4Pairwise genetic differentiation F (mean ± SD) within sampling site (i.e., shallow vs. deeper populations; light grey) and between sampling sites (dark grey).
Asterisks indicate significant differences in genetic differentiation levels (P < 0.05).