Literature DB >> 3117915

Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery.

O Molven1, A Halse, B Grung.   

Abstract

An observer strategy involving trained and experienced examiners was used in a large series of endodontic surgery cases, evaluated radiographically 1 year after the operation. The cases were grouped in 1 of the following 4 healing groups; complete healing, incomplete healing (scar tissue), uncertain healing and unsatisfactory healing (failures). The radiographs were first examined separately by an oral surgeon and an endodontist. Deviating cases were subjected to joint evaluation. The overall agreement before joint interpretation was satisfactory: 63% when corrected for chance agreement. Agreement after joint evaluation reached 94% of the total material. Disagreement and difficult borderline cases were judged by an oral radiologist. He was more pessimistic than the 2 main examiners. The identification of healed cases with apical bone which had not yet obtained normal radiopacity and structure was difficult. Altogether, the observer consistency was satisfactory; the selection of experts increased the chances of "true" diagnoses; the important screening function of the one-year control was confirmed. The applied strategy and the classification are recommended for follow-up studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3117915     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(87)80080-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  33 in total

1.  Pre-operative diagnostic radiograph interpretation by general dental practitioners for root canal treatment.

Authors:  I Anand Sherwood
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Treatment of through-and-through bone lesion using autologous growth factors and xenogeneic bone graft: a case report.

Authors:  Silvio Taschieri; Gabriele Rosano; Tommaso Weinstein; Monica Bortolin; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-10-23

3.  The resection angle in apical surgery: a CBCT assessment.

Authors:  Thomas von Arx; Simone F M Janner; Simon S Jensen; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Magnification devices for endodontic therapy.

Authors:  Massimo Del Fabbro; Silvio Taschieri; Giovanni Lodi; Giuseppe Banfi; Roberto L Weinstein
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-09

Review 5.  Endodontic surgery.

Authors:  B S Chong; J S Rhodes
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 6.  Comparison of long-term survival of implants and endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  F C Setzer; S Kim
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 7.  Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome.

Authors:  Thomas von Arx
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-11

8.  Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery.

Authors:  Casper Kruse; Rubens Spin-Neto; Jesper Reibel; Ann Wenzel; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 9.  Treatment planning the endodontic-implant interface.

Authors:  W P Saunders
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Periapical microsurgery: the effect of root dentinal defects on short- and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Peter Z Tawil; Veeral M Saraiya; Johnah C Galicia; Derek J Duggan
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.