| Literature DB >> 31178880 |
Alexandra Erfmeier1,2, Kerstin L Haldan1, Lili-M Beckmann3, Magdalene Behrens3, Jonas Rotert1, Joachim Schrautzer3.
Abstract
Temperate European forests are currently largely under attack by theEntities:
Keywords: Fraxinus excelsior; Hymenoscyphus fraxineus; ash rejuvenation; ash-rich forests; ecosystem vulnerability; forest community type; fungal pathogen; species richness
Year: 2019 PMID: 31178880 PMCID: PMC6542983 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Main landscape regions of Schleswig-Holstein with locations of forest plots. The two investigated landscape types are the ancient moraines in the west (gray) and recent moraines in the east (light gray). Location of forest plots is depicted by red dots.
FIGURE 2Non-metric multidimensional scaling of cover of all herb layer species in the plots (n = 37), with blue symbols indicating the different forest types: alder-ash forest (AAF, circles), hornbeam-ash forest (HAF, triangles) and beech-ash forest (BAF; squares). Species are represented by red circles. Environmental variables that correlate significantly (p ≤ 0.05) with one of the axes of the NMDS are shown and colored accordingly (green for correlation with NMDS axis 1, red for correlation with NMDS axis 2, blue for correlation with NMDS axis 3). For a clearer display, only 22% of species are labeled. For abbreviations of predictor variables see Table 1. Species names are abbreviated as follows: Ace_pla: Acer pseudoplatanus L., Ado_mos: Adoxa moschatellina L., Aeg_pod: Aegopodium podagraria L., Aes_hip: Aesculus hippocastanum L., Ang_pal: Angelica palustris (BESSER) HOFFM., Bet_pub: Betula pubescens EHRH., Bra_pin: Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) P. BEAUV., Cal_can: Calamagrostis canescens (F. H. WIGG.) ROTH, Cal_pal: Caltha palustris L., Car_bet: Carpinus betulus L., Car_fle: Cardamine flexuosa WITH., Car_hir: Carex hirta L., Cir_pal: Cirsium_palustre (L.) SCOP., Cor_ave: Corylus avellana L., Cra_lae: Crataegus laevigata (POIR.) DC., Cra_mon: Crataegus monogyna JACQ., Cra_spe: Crataegus spec., Cys_fra: Cystopteris fragilis (L.) BERNH. s. str., Equ_tel: Equisetum telmateia EHRH., Fag_syl: Fagus sylvatica L., Fes_alt: Festuca altissima ALL., Gal_apa: Galium aparine L., Jun_inf: Juncus inflexus L., Lam_arg: Lamium argentatum (SMEJKAL) G. H. LOOS (=Galeobdolon argentatum SMEJKAL), Lam_gal: Lamium galeobdolon (L.) L. subsp. galeobdolon (=Galeobdolon luteum HUDS.), Luz_spec: Luzula spec., Mel_uni: Melica uniflora RETZ., Men_aqu: Mentha aquatica L., Pha_aru: Phalaris arundinacea L., Pla_chl: Platanthera chlorantha CUSTER ex RCHB., Poa_pra: Poa pratensis L., Pop_spe: Populus spec., Pri_ela: Primula elatior (L.) HILL, Pri_vul: Primula vulgaris HUDS., Pru_spi: Prunus spinosa L., Pul_obs: Pulmonaria obscura DUMORT., Rub_fru: Rubus fruticosus agg., Rub_spec.: Rubus spec., Rub_×_pse: Rubus × pseudidaeus (WEIHE) LEJ., Rum_pat: Rumex patientia L., San_eur: Sanicula europaea L., Sol_dul: Solanum dulcamara L., Ste_nem: Stellaria nemorum L. s. str., Ulm_lae: Ulmus laevis PALL.
Correlation coefficients of environmental variables and of variables describing species diversity and community structure with the first three axes of the NMDS.
| NMDS1 | NMDS2 | NMDS3 | SigCode | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hornbeam-ash forest (HAF) | 0.138 | 0.987 | –0.083 | 0.107 | 0.3 | |
| Fungal damage to juveniles | 0.808 | –0.187 | –0.559 | 0.104 | 0.321 | |
| Basal diameter | –0.159 | –0.196 | 0.968 | 0.098 | 0.315 | |
| Diameter at breast height (DBH) | 0.004 | –0.192 | 0.981 | 0.126 | 0.197 | |
| Abundance of adult ashes | –0.805 | 0.569 | –0.17 | 0.199 | 0.051 | . |
| Total abundance ashes | –0.88 | 0.322 | –0.349 | 0.136 | 0.134 | |
| Density of adult ashes | –0.663 | 0.605 | –0.441 | 0.064 | 0.494 | |
| Proportion of ashes in tree layer 1 (TL1) | –0.721 | 0.515 | 0.464 | 0.15 | 0.126 | |
| Abundance of juvenile ashes | –0.881 | 0.321 | –0.348 | 0.135 | 0.143 | |
| pH | 0.663 | 0.41 | 0.626 | 0.166 | 0.092 | . |
| C/N | –0.848 | –0.495 | –0.192 | 0.137 | 0.141 | |
| Cation exchange capacity (CEC) | 0.308 | 0.214 | 0.927 | 0.16 | 0.095 | . |
| Understorey relative light (RLI) | 0.975 | 0.186 | 0.125 | 0.185 | 0.087 | . |
Results of the Analysis of Variance on the optimal linear mixed effects model explaining loss of leaves of adult ash trees on the plot level.
| MS | NumDF | DenDF | SigCode | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Landscape type | 558.1 | 1 | 16.75 | 2.9131 | 0.106 | |
| Species richness | 776 | 1 | 24.5 | 4.0504 | 0.055 |
FIGURE 3Plot level: Estimates of crown defoliation of adult ashes by forest type AAF, alder-ash forest; HAF, hornbeam-ash forest; BAF, beech-ash forest. Box plots give medians, quartiles, minimum, and maximum per forest type (n = 12 for AAF and HAF, n = 13 for BAF). Different letters indicate significant differences according to post hoc test. For statistical details see Table 2.
FIGURE 4Individual level: Estimates of crown defoliation of adult ashes (A) by forest type and (B) in relation to tree height. AAF, alder-ash forest; HAF, hornbeam-ash forest; BAF, beech-ash forest. Box plots give medians, quartiles, minimum, and maximum per forest type (n = 12 for AAF and HAF, n = 13 for BAF). Different letters indicate significant differences according to post hoc test. For statistical details see Table 3.
Results of the Analysis of Variance on the optimal linear mixed effects model explaining loss of leaves of adult ash trees on the individual tree level.
| MS | NumDF | DenDF | SigCode | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∗∗∗ | ||||||
| Landscape type | 998.1 | 1 | 28.538 | 1.716 | 0.201 | |
| Landscape type × forest type | 206.6 | 2 | 29.836 | 0.355 | 0.704 | |
| ∗ | ||||||
| Diameter at breast height | 143.1 | 1 | 148.74 | 0.246 | 0.621 |
Results of the Analysis of Variance on the optimal linear mixed effects model explaining damage to young ashes (a) based on mean abundance of fungal infection of juveniles and (b) based on mean percental damage of juveniles.
| Variable | MS | NumDF | DenDF | SigCode | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ||||||
| (b) | ||||||
FIGURE 5Estimates of fungal infection damage of juvenile ashes on the plot level, (A) based on mean abundance of fungal infection of juveniles in relation to total species richness (SR) and (B) log fungal infection based on mean percental damage of juveniles in relation to relative light intensity (RLI). For statistical details see Table 4.