Literature DB >> 31178644

Incarcerated and Transmigrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Managed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of East Delhi: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis.

Richa Sharma1, Amita Suneja1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception having least number of complications. We aimed to find the incidence, risk factors and the management done for incarcerated and transmigrated intrauterine contraceptive devices at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital during past 5 years.
METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of 5 years (January 2013-December 2017) was done, and the case records from Medical Record Department and Family Planning Unit of our institution were analysed.
RESULTS: Total number of IUCD insertions done in last 5 years (from January 2013 to December 2017) in our institution was 4557. Misplaced IUCDs requiring surgical interventions were 71 (1.6%) out of which 63 (88.7%) were incomplete perforations or embedded and 8 (11.3%) were complete perforations or transmigrated IUCDs. Transmigration sites were omentum, uterovesical fold, mesentery and bladder. Laparotomy was needed in 4 (5.6%), and 2 (2.8%) needed each laparoscopy and cystoscopy. Main risk factors identified were postpartum previous on or two caesarean sections, low parity, grade of operator and IUCD and uterocervical length discrepancy.
CONCLUSION: The risk of perforation should not be a reason to defer IUCD insertion and every effort should be made to bring down its failure and complication rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Copper T; Incarcerated; Intrauterine contraceptive devices; Transmigrated

Year:  2018        PMID: 31178644      PMCID: PMC6531536          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-018-1159-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  7 in total

1.  Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies.

Authors:  Kari P Braaten; Carol B Benson; Rie Maurer; Alisa B Goldberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events.

Authors:  Norman Goldstuck
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2012-09

4.  Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.

Authors:  Klaas Heinemann; Suzanne Reed; Sabine Moehner; Thai Do Minh
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-07

Review 6.  Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Petrus S Steyn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-12-04

Review 7.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sam Rowlands; Emeka Oloto; David H Horwell
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-16
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Postplacental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Transmigration - Rare but the Real Concern for Service Providers.

Authors:  Shweta Patel; Ajay Halder; Pankhuri Dubey; R Sanghamita; Julie Hansa John
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2022-01-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.