Maher Eldafrawy1, Laura Greimers1, Sandrine Bekaert2, Patrick Gailly3, Cédric Lenaerts3, Jean-François Nguyen4, Michaël Sadoun5, Amélie Mainjot6. 1. Dental Biomaterials Research Unit (d-BRU), Institute of Dentistry, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium. 2. Dental Biomaterials Research Unit (d-BRU), Institute of Dentistry, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Liège Hospital (CHU), Liège, Belgium. 3. Surface Micro and Nano Engineering Division, Centre spatial de Liège, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium. 4. UFR d'Odontologie, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech-CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, Paris, France. 5. MaJEB sprl, Liège, Belgium. 6. Dental Biomaterials Research Unit (d-BRU), Institute of Dentistry, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Liège Hospital (CHU), Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: a.mainjot@chuliege.be.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate silane influence on the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) of composite cement, with the two sub-classes of CAD-CAM composites, polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN) and dispersed fillers (DF), after hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) or airborne-particle abrasion (AB). A secondary objective was to correlate results with developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) and surface wettability. METHODS: Experimental PICN and DF blocks were cut into equilateral half-prisms, which were treated with HF or AB, then treated with an experimental silane or not and bonded to their counterparts with an experimental light-cure resin cement. After thermocycling, samples (n=30 per group) were tested for IFT using the notchless triangular prism test in a water bath at 36°C. Moreover, profilometry and contact angle measurement were performed on rectangular samples of each group. Finally, bonding interface was analysed by SEM. RESULTS: PICN-HF treated with silane showed the highest IFT significantly. Three-way ANOVA revealed the influence of silane, material class and surface pre-treatment (HF or AB) on IFT (p<0.05). When silane was used, IFT was correlated with Sdr, while surface wettability was increased. Silane application significantly increased IFT for PICN but not for DF, while PICN performed better with HF and DF with AB. SIGNIFICANCE: Silane increases IFT of composite cement with PICNs, but not with DF materials. Results suggest that silane increases the micromechanical bond by promoting resin cement spreading and penetration in surface roughness. This roughness is significantly higher for pre-treated PICNs than for DF due to their specific honeycomb microstructure when etched, which explains their better bonding properties.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate silane influence on the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) of composite cement, with the two sub-classes of CAD-CAM composites, polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN) and dispersed fillers (DF), after hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) or airborne-particle abrasion (AB). A secondary objective was to correlate results with developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) and surface wettability. METHODS: Experimental PICN and DF blocks were cut into equilateral half-prisms, which were treated with HF or AB, then treated with an experimental silane or not and bonded to their counterparts with an experimental light-cure resin cement. After thermocycling, samples (n=30 per group) were tested for IFT using the notchless triangular prism test in a water bath at 36°C. Moreover, profilometry and contact angle measurement were performed on rectangular samples of each group. Finally, bonding interface was analysed by SEM. RESULTS: PICN-HF treated with silane showed the highest IFT significantly. Three-way ANOVA revealed the influence of silane, material class and surface pre-treatment (HF or AB) on IFT (p<0.05). When silane was used, IFT was correlated with Sdr, while surface wettability was increased. Silane application significantly increased IFT for PICN but not for DF, while PICN performed better with HF and DF with AB. SIGNIFICANCE: Silane increases IFT of composite cement with PICNs, but not with DF materials. Results suggest that silane increases the micromechanical bond by promoting resin cement spreading and penetration in surface roughness. This roughness is significantly higher for pre-treated PICNs than for DF due to their specific honeycomb microstructure when etched, which explains their better bonding properties.
Authors: Vincent Fouquet; François Lachard; Sarah Abdel-Gawad; Elisabeth Dursun; Jean-Pierre Attal; Philippe François Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 3.748