Qian Lei1, Xin-Chuan Wei2, Ke-Li Huang3, Tao Yu3, Xiao-Shen Zhang3, Huan-Lei Huang4, Hui-Ming Guo4. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. Electronic address: leiqianggh@163.com. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. 4. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The placement of a temporary epicardial pacing wire is a challenge during a minimally invasive redo cardiac operation. The aim of this study is to assess the application of temporary endocardial pacing in patients who underwent minimally invasive redo tricuspid surgery. METHODS: Perioperative data of consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic redo tricuspid surgery were collected. All the tricuspid surgeries and combined procedures were performed under peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass without aortic cross-clamping. A sheath was introduced into the right jugular vein beside the percutaneous superior vena cava cannula and a temporary endocardial pacing catheter was guided into the right ventricle via the sheath prior to the right atrial closure. The pacemaker was connected and run as needed during or after operation. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients who underwent thoracoscopic redo tricuspid surgery were enrolled. Symptomatic tricuspid valve regurgitation (93.9%) and tricuspid valvular prosthesis obstruction (6.1%) after previous cardiac operations were noted as indications for a redo surgery. The mean time from previous cardiac operation to this time redo surgery was 13.3±6.4years. Isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 18 patients (54.5%) and tricuspid valve plasty combined with or without mitral valve replacement was performed in 15 patients (45.5%). A temporary endocardial pacing catheter was successfully placed in the right ventricle for all patients with good sensing and pacing. No temporary pacing related complications occurred from insertion to removal of pacing catheter in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This application of temporary endocardial pacing provided a safe and effective substitute for epicardial pacing in patients who underwent minimally invasive redo tricuspid surgery.
BACKGROUND: The placement of a temporary epicardial pacing wire is a challenge during a minimally invasive redo cardiac operation. The aim of this study is to assess the application of temporary endocardial pacing in patients who underwent minimally invasive redo tricuspid surgery. METHODS: Perioperative data of consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic redo tricuspid surgery were collected. All the tricuspid surgeries and combined procedures were performed under peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass without aortic cross-clamping. A sheath was introduced into the right jugular vein beside the percutaneous superior vena cava cannula and a temporary endocardial pacing catheter was guided into the right ventricle via the sheath prior to the right atrial closure. The pacemaker was connected and run as needed during or after operation. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients who underwent thoracoscopic redo tricuspid surgery were enrolled. Symptomatic tricuspid valve regurgitation (93.9%) and tricuspid valvular prosthesis obstruction (6.1%) after previous cardiac operations were noted as indications for a redo surgery. The mean time from previous cardiac operation to this time redo surgery was 13.3±6.4years. Isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 18 patients (54.5%) and tricuspid valve plasty combined with or without mitral valve replacement was performed in 15 patients (45.5%). A temporary endocardial pacing catheter was successfully placed in the right ventricle for all patients with good sensing and pacing. No temporary pacing related complications occurred from insertion to removal of pacing catheter in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This application of temporary endocardial pacing provided a safe and effective substitute for epicardial pacing in patients who underwent minimally invasive redo tricuspid surgery.