Literature DB >> 31177637

An International Laboratory Comparison Study of Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Adsorption Measurements.

Katherine E Hurst1, Thomas Gennett1,2, Jesse Adams3, Mark D Allendorf4, Rafael Balderas-Xicohténcatl5, Marek Bielewski6, Bryce Edwards7, L Espinal8, Brent Fultz7, Michael Hirscher5, M Sterlin L Hudson8, Zeric Hulvey9, Michel Latroche10, Di-Jia Liu11, Matthew Kapelewski12, Emilio Napolitano6, Zachary T Perry13, Justin Purewal14, Vitalie Stavila4, Mike Veenstra14, James L White4, Yuping Yuan11, Hong-Cai Zhou13, Claudia Zlotea10, Philip Parilla1.   

Abstract

In order to determine a material's hydrogen storage potential, capacity measurements must be robust, reproducible, and accurate. Commonly, research reports focus on the gravimetric capacity, and often times the volumetric capacity is not reported. Determining volumetric capacities is not as straight-forward, especially for amorphous materials. This is the first study to compare measurement reproducibility across laboratories for excess and total volumetric hydrogen sorption capacities based on the packing volume. The use of consistent measurement protocols, common analysis, and figure of merits for reporting data in this study, enable the comparison of the results for two different materials. Importantly, the results show good agreement for excess gravimetric capacities amongst the laboratories. Irreproducibility for excess and total volumetric capacities is attributed to real differences in the measured packing volume of the material.
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative measurement study; excess capacity; hydrogen storage measurement; volumetric capacity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31177637     DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201900166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemphyschem        ISSN: 1439-4235            Impact factor:   3.102


  2 in total

1.  Densified HKUST-1 Monoliths as a Route to High Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacity.

Authors:  David Gerard Madden; Daniel O'Nolan; Nakul Rampal; Robin Babu; Ceren Çamur; Ali N Al Shakhs; Shi-Yuan Zhang; Graham A Rance; Javier Perez; Nicola Pietro Maria Casati; Carlos Cuadrado-Collados; Denis O'Sullivan; Nicholas P Rice; Thomas Gennett; Philip Parilla; Sarah Shulda; Katherine E Hurst; Vitalie Stavila; Mark D Allendorf; Joaquin Silvestre-Albero; Alexander C Forse; Neil R Champness; Karena W Chapman; David Fairen-Jimenez
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 16.383

2.  Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture.

Authors:  Amir H Farmahini; Shreenath Krishnamurthy; Daniel Friedrich; Stefano Brandani; Lev Sarkisov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 60.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.