| Literature DB >> 31177637 |
Katherine E Hurst1, Thomas Gennett1,2, Jesse Adams3, Mark D Allendorf4, Rafael Balderas-Xicohténcatl5, Marek Bielewski6, Bryce Edwards7, L Espinal8, Brent Fultz7, Michael Hirscher5, M Sterlin L Hudson8, Zeric Hulvey9, Michel Latroche10, Di-Jia Liu11, Matthew Kapelewski12, Emilio Napolitano6, Zachary T Perry13, Justin Purewal14, Vitalie Stavila4, Mike Veenstra14, James L White4, Yuping Yuan11, Hong-Cai Zhou13, Claudia Zlotea10, Philip Parilla1.
Abstract
In order to determine a material's hydrogen storage potential, capacity measurements must be robust, reproducible, and accurate. Commonly, research reports focus on the gravimetric capacity, and often times the volumetric capacity is not reported. Determining volumetric capacities is not as straight-forward, especially for amorphous materials. This is the first study to compare measurement reproducibility across laboratories for excess and total volumetric hydrogen sorption capacities based on the packing volume. The use of consistent measurement protocols, common analysis, and figure of merits for reporting data in this study, enable the comparison of the results for two different materials. Importantly, the results show good agreement for excess gravimetric capacities amongst the laboratories. Irreproducibility for excess and total volumetric capacities is attributed to real differences in the measured packing volume of the material.Entities:
Keywords: comparative measurement study; excess capacity; hydrogen storage measurement; volumetric capacity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31177637 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201900166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemphyschem ISSN: 1439-4235 Impact factor: 3.102