Literature DB >> 31177571

Social media and cadaveric dissection: A survey study.

Rabjot Rai1,2, Rafik Shereen1, Matthew Protas1, Clara Greaney1, Katherine N Brooks1, Joe Iwanaga1, Marios Loukas2, R Shane Tubbs1,2.   

Abstract

The use of social media opens content to the general public and, as a result, places images of cadaveric dissection in an open forum. This raises the question: should the general public have access to such material? A survey was conducted examining whether the general public should have access to gross cadaveric dissection images and videos for educational purposes via social media. Both medical and laypersons were queried. Questions included in the survey considered whether images were too graphic, whether online cadaveric content should be age-restricted, and whether consent by the deceased was necessary. A link to the survey was accessible to 63,562 followers through the Seattle Science Foundation's Facebookpage for 3 weeks. Among 300 responders, 89% (267/300) agreed that portrayals of cadaveric specimens/dissection on social media should be accessible by the general public for anatomical education, and 84.67% (254/300) stated that cadaveric dissection is not too graphic for untrained eyes. There was agreement by 60.33% (181/300) that an age restriction should be in place for the viewing of cadaveric dissection on social media, and 39.33% (253/300) of responders suggested restriction to 18 years and older. No statistically significant association was noted between a prior or current history of anatomy education and the frequency of positive responses to the survey questions. Social media is an innovative tool for dispensing anatomical education. The use of cadaveric images and videos provides accessibility to the general public who wish to learn more about human anatomy and their own body. Clin. Anat. 32:1033-1041, 2019.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; body donation; cadaver; cadaveric dissection; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31177571     DOI: 10.1002/ca.23421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  6 in total

1.  Digital and Social Media in Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Catherine M Hennessy; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Teaching with Cadavers Outside of the Dissection Room Using Cadaveric Videos.

Authors:  Danya Stone; Catherine M Hennessy; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Advances in Digital Technology in Teaching Human Anatomy: Ethical Predicaments.

Authors:  Kerri Keet; Beverley Kramer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  The Cadaver Conundrum: Sourcing and Anatomical Embalming of Human Dead Bodies by Medical Schools during and after COVID-19 Pandemic: Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  S S S N Rajasekhar; V Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Social Media Guidelines for Anatomists.

Authors:  Catherine M Hennessy; Danielle F Royer; Amanda J Meyer; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation.

Authors:  Joe Iwanaga; Marios Loukas; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.409

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.