Literature DB >> 31177407

Integrating logistic regression and cellular automata-Markov models with the experts' perceptions for detecting and simulating land use changes and their driving forces.

Zohreh Shahbazian1, Marzban Faramarzi2, Noredin Rostami1, Hossein Mahdizadeh3.   

Abstract

Modeling spatial-temporal dynamic of land use change is of great necessity for understanding the status of the past, causes of the change, and prediction of the future. This study aims to objectify three topics which include identifying the past land use changes, modeling the future changes, and subsequently considering their driving forces. The change detection analysis has shown that about 12,081.8 ha of the study area has changed since 1984 to 2014. Moreover, the models of cellular automata (CA) and Markov chain were applied in order to predict the land use changes of 2024 and 2034. The simulated transition matrix showed that about 6780 ha and 10,835 ha would change during the periods of 2014-2024 and 2014-2034, respectively. Furthermore, the results of the logistic regression model showed that the human driving forces of distance to roads, distance to wells, distance to streams, and distance to residential areas have had a negative effect on the process land use changes. Additionally, a questionnaire was used to obtain information considering the management factors of preventing land use changes, the perception of the natural resources' experts and in turn finding some socioeconomic and policy forces on land use changes. The Friedman's test analysis indicates that the factors of the official rules of government, economy, weakness of regulatory systems, and development activities, e.g., infrastructure and industrial projects, were identified as the leading causes of converting natural ecosystems to other land uses, particularly to cropland. Therefore, the decision-makers and managers should be assigned comprehensive planning for the protection, restoration, and development of natural resources, especially in this region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cropland; Driving forces; Land use; Natural ecosystems; Questionnaire; Remote sensing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31177407     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7555-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  7 in total

1.  Detection and prediction of land cover changes using Markov chain model in semi-arid rangeland in western Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Fathizad; Noredin Rostami; Marzban Faramarzi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Which is the correct statistical test to use?

Authors:  Evie McCrum-Gardner
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.

Authors:  Eric F Lambin; Patrick Meyfroidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding-preference experiments.

Authors:  Rubén Roa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Analyzing Land Use/Land Cover Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS in Rize, North-East Turkey.

Authors:  Selçuk Reis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires.

Authors:  H van Laerhoven; H J van der Zaag-Loonen; B H F Derkx
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Consumer diversity interacts with prey defenses to drive ecosystem function.

Authors:  Douglas B Rasher; Andrew S Hoey; Mark E Hay
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.499

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Driving Factors and Future Prediction of Land Use and Cover Change Based on Satellite Remote Sensing Data by the LCM Model: A Case Study from Gansu Province, China.

Authors:  Kongming Li; Mingming Feng; Asim Biswas; Haohai Su; Yalin Niu; Jianjun Cao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Geospatial measurement of urban sprawl using multi-temporal datasets from 1991 to 2021: case studies of four Indian medium-sized cities.

Authors:  Vishal Chettry
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.307

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.