Literature DB >> 31176013

Lowering Portal Pressure Improves Outcomes of Patients With Cirrhosis, With or Without Ascites: A Meta-Analysis.

Laura Turco1, Candid Villanueva2, Vincenzo La Mura3, Juan Carlos García-Pagán4, Thomas Reiberger5, Joan Genescà6, Roberto J Groszmann7, Barjesh C Sharma8, Carlo Merkel9, Christophe Bureau10, Edilmar Alvarado2, Juan Gonzalez Abraldes11, Agustin Albillos12, Rafael Bañares13, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic14, Salvador Augustin6, Shiv K Sarin8, Jaime Bosch15, Guadalupe García-Tsao16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In unselected patients with cirrhosis, those with reductions in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to below a defined threshold (responders) have a reduced risk of variceal hemorrhage (VH) and death. We performed a meta-analysis to compare this effect in patients with vs without ascites.
METHODS: We collected data from 15 studies of primary or secondary prophylaxis of VH that reported data on VH and death in responders vs nonresponders. We included studies in which data on ascites at baseline and on other relevant outcomes during follow-up evaluation were available. We performed separate meta-analyses for patients with vs without ascites.
RESULTS: Of the 1113 patients included in the studies, 968 patients (87%) had been treated with nonselective β-blockers. In 993 patients (89%), HVPG response was defined as a decrease of more than 20% from baseline (>10% in 11% of patients) or to less than 12 mm Hg. In the 661 patients without ascites, responders (n = 329; 50%) had significantly lower odds of events (ascites, VH, or encephalopathy) than nonresponders (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.56). Odds of death or liver transplantation were also significantly lower among responders than nonresponders (OR, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.32-0.78). In the 452 patients with ascites, responders (n = 188; 42%) had significantly lower odds of events (VH, refractory ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or hepatorenal syndrome) than nonresponders (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.43). Overall, odds of death or liver transplantation were lower among responders (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.75). No heterogeneity was observed among studies.
CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of clinical trials, we found that patients with cirrhosis with and without ascites who respond to treatment with nonselective β-blockers (based on reductions in HVPG) have a reduced risk of events, death, or liver transplantation.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient; NSBB; Outcome; Portal Hypertension

Year:  2019        PMID: 31176013     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  18 in total

Review 1.  Portal pressure reductions induced by nonselective beta-blockers improve outcomes and decrease mortality in patients with cirrhosis with and without ascites.

Authors:  Laura Turco; Guadalupe García-Tsao
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Update on the Evaluation and Management of Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Gabriella Aitcheson; Carensa Cezar; Irene John; Binu V John
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2021-12

Review 3.  Where does TIPS fit in the management of patients with cirrhosis?

Authors:  Juan Carlos García-Pagán; Saad Saffo; Mattias Mandorfer; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2020-05-23

4.  The predictive value of baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient for variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients receiving secondary prevention.

Authors:  Chuan Liu; Yanna Liu; Ruoyang Shao; Sining Wang; Guangchuan Wang; Lifen Wang; Mingyan Zhang; Jinlin Hou; Chunqing Zhang; Xiaolong Qi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 5.  Beta-blockers in cirrhosis: Evidence-based indications and limitations.

Authors:  Susana G Rodrigues; Yuly P Mendoza; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2019-12-20

6.  Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guruprasad P Aithal; Naaventhan Palaniyappan; Louise China; Suvi Härmälä; Lucia Macken; Jennifer M Ryan; Emilie A Wilkes; Kevin Moore; Joanna A Leithead; Peter C Hayes; Alastair J O'Brien; Sumita Verma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Liver stiffness assessment as an alternative to hepatic venous pressure gradient for predicting rebleed after acute variceal bleed: A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Samagra Agarwal; Sanchit Sharma; Abhinav Anand; Deepak Gunjan; Anoop Saraya
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-11-09

Review 8.  Primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of different strategies.

Authors:  Ângelo Zambam de Mattos; Carlos Terra; Alberto Queiroz Farias; Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 9.  Recent advances in the understanding and management of hepatorenal syndrome.

Authors:  Benedikt Simbrunner; Michael Trauner; Thomas Reiberger; Mattias Mandorfer
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Outcomes of Portal Pressure-Guided Therapy in Decompensated Cirrhosis With Index Variceal Bleed in Asian Cohort.

Authors:  Sanchit Sharma; Samagra Agarwal; Deepak Gunjan; Kanav Kaushal; Abhinav Anand; Srikant Gopi; Srikant Mohta; Anoop Saraya
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.