Literature DB >> 31175914

Lay-people's knowledge about toxicology and its principles in eight European countries.

Angela Bearth1, Rita Saleh2, Michael Siegrist2.   

Abstract

The procedures of risk assessment related to substances consumed or used by consumers (e.g., food additives, cleaning products) are highly complex and there exists some controversy between experts in regards to the uncertainty linked to it. This contributes to the well documented divergence in experts and lay-people's judgments, particularly for synthetic or man-made chemicals. By investigating lay-people's knowledge gaps and misconceptions related to toxicology, we hope to contribute to facilitating the communication between experts and the lay public. For this, a large-scale survey measuring knowledge of toxicological principles, trust in regulators, the irrational fear of chemicals and health concern was distributed in eight European countries (Total: N = 5631). Results suggest that large gaps exist regarding people's knowledge of toxicological principles and that a lack of knowledge is significantly associated with higher levels of chemophobia. Particular attention for future communication efforts should be placed on the stigma associated with the terminology, principles of dose-response associations and the comparability of substances of natural and synthetic origin.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemicals; Chemophobia; Risk perception; Science communication; Toxicology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31175914     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  3 in total

1.  Chemophobia versus the identity of chemists: heroes of chemistry as an effective communication strategy.

Authors:  Radek Chalupa; Karel Nesměrák
Journal:  Monatsh Chem       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 1.451

2.  The role of the media in the amplification of a contested health risk: Rubber granulate on sport fields.

Authors:  Marion de Vries; Liesbeth Claassen; Margreet Te Wierik; Enny Das; Marcel Mennen; Aura Timen; Danielle Timmermans
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.302

Review 3.  The Social Amplification of Risk Framework: A Normative Perspective on Trust?

Authors:  Angela Bearth; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.302

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.