| Literature DB >> 31175834 |
Ana Paula de Araújo1, Marcelo Henrique Santos Paiva1,2, Amanda Maria Cabral1, Antônio Emanuel Holanda Dias Cavalcanti1, Luiz Fernando Freitas Pessoa1, Diego Felipe Araujo Diniz1, Elisama Helvecio1, Ellyda Vanessa Gomes da Silva1, Norma Machado da Silva3, Daniela Bandeira Anastácio4, Claudenice Pontes4, Vânia Nunes5, Maria de Fátima Marinho de Souza6, Fernando Jorge Rodrigues Magalhães6, Maria Alice Varjal de Melo Santos1, Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres1.
Abstract
Resistance to chemical insecticides detected in Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquitoes has been a problem for the National Dengue Control Program (PNCD) over the last years. In order to provide deeper knowledge of resistance to xenobiotics, our study evaluated the susceptibility profile of temephos, diflubenzuron, and cypermethrin insecticides in natural mosquito populations from the Pernambuco State, associating these results with the local historical use of such compounds. Furthermore, mechanisms that may be associated with this particular type of resistance were characterized. Bioassays with multiple temephos and diflubenzuron concentrations were performed to detect and quantify resistance. For cypermethrin, diagnostic dose assays were performed. Biochemical tests were carried out to quantify the activity of detoxification enzymes. In addition, a screening of mutations present in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene (NaV) was performed in samples previously submitted to bioassays with cypermethrin. The populations under study were resistant to temephos and showed a positive correlation between insecticide consumption and the resistance ratio (RR) to the compound. For diflubenzuron, the biological activity ratio (BAR) ranged from 1.3 to 4.7 times, when compared to the susceptible strain. All populations showed resistance to cypermethrin. Altered enzymatic profiles of alpha, p-nitrophenyl acetate (PNPA) esterases and glutathione-S-transferases were recorded in most of these samples. Molecular analysis demonstrated that Arcoverde was the only population that presented the mutated form 1016Ile/Ile. These findings show that the situation is critical vis-à-vis the effectiveness of mosquito control using chemical insecticides, since resistance to temephos and cypermethrin is widespread in Ae. aegypti from Pernambuco.Entities:
Keywords: chemical control; insecticide resistance; mosquito control
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31175834 PMCID: PMC6556078 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iez054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Schematic map from Brazil (A), highlighting mosquito collection sites from the Archipelago of Fernando de Noronha (B) and Pernambuco’s Meso regions.
Lethal concentration for 95% of individuals (LC95) and RR for temephos, estimated for Aedes aegypti populations and Rockefeller population (standard susceptibility strain)
| Meso-Region | Year of collection | Population | Number of larvae | LC95 (mg/liter) (95% CI) | Resistance ratio (RR95) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockfeller Standard 1 | 1,260 | 0.014 (0.014–0.016) | 1.0 | ||
| Rockfeller Standard 2 | 1,440 | 0.009 (0.008–0.010) | 1.0 | ||
| Metropolitan | 2012 | Olinda | 1,200 | 0.162 (0.134–0.213) | 18.0 |
| 2012 | Ipojuca | 1,500 | 0.193 (0.154–0.265) | 21.4 | |
| Agreste | 2011 | Itaíba | 1,320 | 1.682 (1.215–2.632) | 120.2 |
| 2012 | Caruaru | 1,360 | 2.160 (1.944–2.477) | 240.1 | |
| Sertão | 2012 | S. Talhada | 1,320 | 2.803 (2.579–3.098) | 200.2 |
| 2012 | Arcoverde | 1,320 | 3.116 (2.848–3.477) | 222.6 | |
| Sertão do São Francisco | 2011 | Petrolina | 1,760 | 0.545 (0.436–0.723) | 38.9 |
Populations of Aedes aegypti submitted to the activity of the 6333X batch, Standard 1.
Populations of Aedes aegypti submitted to the activity of the SZE9105X batch, Standard 2, for the lethal concentration (LC95) and for the calculation of the RR. RR = LC population/LC Rockefeller.
Adult emergence inhibition for 50% (EI50) and 95% (EI95) of individuals and BAR to diflubenzuron, estimated for Aedes aegypti populations from Pernambuco, Brazil
| Population | Number of larvae | EI50 (mg/liter) (50% CI) | EI95 (mg/liter) (95% CI) | Biological activity ratio (BAR95) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller | 2,000 | 0.456 (0.351–0.549) | 1.560 (1.400–2.047) | 1.00 |
| Fernando de Noronha | 480 | 1.212 (1.102–1.329) | 2.640 (2.386–2.991) | 1.69 |
| Recife | 1,600 | 1.612 (1.465–1.787) | 3.687 (3.212–4.435) | 2.37 |
| Itaíba | 1,520 | 1.511 (1.346–1.684) | 3.399 (3.001–4.014) | 2.18 |
| Caruaru | 1,200 | 3.761 (3.243–4.410) | 7.293 (6.278–9.098) | 4.67 |
| Cedro | 1,360 | 1.171 (0.981–1.538) | 4.224 (3.376–6.138) | 2.70 |
| Salgueiro | 1,600 | 0.605 (0.306–0.778) | 2.094 (1.791–2.747) | 1.34 |
| Serra Talhada | 1,440 | 2.839 (2.579–3.126) | 7.013 (6.088–8.467) | 4.49 |
| Petrolina | 1,520 | 1.746 (1.495–2.007) | 4.845 (4.255–5.733) | 3.10 |
BAR95 = EI95 population/EI95 Rockefeller.
Knockdown effect, mortality rate, and susceptibility status of Aedes aegypti populations from Pernambuco-Brazil to the pyrethroid cypermethrin (8 µg/bottle)
| Knockdown effect (%) | Mortality rate (%) after cypermethrin exposure | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure time | Recovery time | |||||||
| Meso-Region | Population | Generation | Number of females | 15 min | 30 min | 120 min | 24 h | Susceptibility status |
| Rockefeller | 149 | 94.6 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Susceptible | ||
| Arquipélago | F. de Noronha | F2 | 148 | 83.1 | 97.9 | 100 | 70.2 | Resistant |
| Metropolitana | Recife | F1 | 160 | 14.0 | 52.5 | 93.7 | 32.5 | Resistant |
| Ipojuca | F1 | 134 | 5.20 | 35.8 | 91.0 | 58.2 | Resistant | |
| Olinda | F1 | 145 | 6.90 | 32.4 | 93.8 | 35.2 | Resistant | |
| Mata | G. de Goitá | F1 | 153 | 51.6 | 84.3 | 100 | 66.0 | Resistant |
| Agreste | Santa Cruz | F1 | 139 | 64.7 | 88.5 | 100 | 58.9 | Resistant |
| Agrestina | F2 | 163 | 13.5 | 73.6 | 98.1 | 43.5 | Resistant | |
| Itaíba | F1 | 153 | 1.96 | 18.9 | 85.6 | 27.4 | Resistant | |
| Caruaru | F2 | 167 | 4.80 | 34.7 | 82.6 | 31.7 | Resistant | |
| Sertão | Cedro | F1 | 158 | 72.1 | 90.5 | 100 | 70.8 | Resistant |
| Salgueiro | F1 | 150 | 82.0 | 95.3 | 100 | 68.6 | Resistant | |
| A. da Ingazeira | F1 | 152 | 54.6 | 83.5 | 96.7 | 36.8 | Resistant | |
| S. J. do Egito | F1 | 170 | 42.9 | 86.5 | 99.4 | 64.1 | Resistant | |
| S. Talhada | F2 | 165 | 0.0 | 4.84 | 67.3 | 18.8 | Resistant | |
| Arcoverde | F2 | 148 | 0.0 | 8.80 | 66.9 | 10.8 | Resistant | |
| Sertão do São Francisco | Petrolina | F1 | 158 | 1.9 | 29.1 | 84.8 | 22.1 | Resistant |
Control strain.
Enzyme activity observed in Aedes aegypti adults of populations from municipalities in Pernambuco-Brazil and the Rockefeller strain
|
| GST (mmol/mg ptn/min) | α-esterase (nmol/mg ptn/min) | β-esterase (nmol/mg ptn/min) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen | Number of adults | p99 | % >p99 | Classification | Number of adults | p99 | % >p99 | Classification | Number of adults | p99 | % >p99 | Classification | |
| Rockefeller | 123 | 1.41 | - | - | 120 | 49.30 | - | - | 113 | 73.58 | - | - | |
| Olinda | F1 | 157 | 3.40 | 89 | HA | 149 | 58.67 | 10 | U | 109 | 87.81 | 3 | U |
| Ipojuca | F1 | 120 | 3.23 | 77 | HA | 197 | 54.98 | 7 | U | 198 | 78.81 | 3 | U |
| Itaíba | F1 | 99 | 2.26 | 32 | A | 118 | 61.38 | 18 | A | 117 | 66.95 | 0 | U |
| Caruaru | F2 | 199 | 4.00 | 98 | HA | 161 | 98.17 | 50 | HA | 185 | 89.03 | 6 | U |
| S. Talhada | F1 | 118 | 2.62 | 81 | HA | 143 | 86.02 | 50 | HA | 156 | 83.23 | 9 | U |
| Arcoverde | F2 | 89 | 2.28 | 48 | A | 155 | 80.03 | 53 | HA | 157 | 84.64 | 4 | U |
| Petrolina | F1 | 152 | 3.35 | 63 | HA | 114 | 54.94 | 11 | U | 108 | 71.95 | 1 | U |
|
| Esterases-PNPA (Δabs/mg ptn/min) | MFO (nmol/mg ptn/min) | ACE (% act) | ||||||||||
| Gen | Number of adults | p99 | % >p99 | Classification | Number of adults | p99 | % >p99 | Classification | Number of adults | p99 | % >p99 | Classification | |
| Rockefeller | 116 | 3.69 | - | - | 119 | 66.12 | - | - | 105 | 26 | - | - | |
| Olinda | F1 | 113 | 8.10 | 69 | HA | 159 | 87.94 | 9 | U | 147 | 16.36 | 0 | U |
| Ipojuca | F1 | 134 | 5.32 | 20 | A | 159 | 65.66 | 1 | U | 107 | 16.31 | 0 | U |
| Itaíba | F1 | 114 | 4.91 | 22 | A | 104 | 72.29 | 3 | U | 118 | 18.81 | 1 | U |
| Caruaru | F2 | 111 | 7.81 | 48 | A | 160 | 64.93 | 1 | U | 80 | 23.55 | 0 | U |
| S. Talhada | F1 | 117 | 6.84 | 26 | A | 155 | 35.63 | 0 | U | 153 | 16.69 | 0 | U |
| Arcoverde | F2 | 112 | 4.93 | 18 | A | 159 | 57.17 | 0 | U | 157 | 18.79 | 0 | U |
| Petrolina | F1 | 109 | 5.25 | 32 | A | 155 | 90.92 | 6 | U | 116 | 17.77 | 0 | U |
Generation used in the biochemical test.
Number of tested individuals.
99th Percentile for the populations.
Rate of the population with activity higher than the Rockefeller 99th Percentile.
Classification of enzyme activity compared to control (Rockefeller): unaltered (U); altered (A); and highly altered (HA).
Rate of activity in the presence of propoxur.
History of temephos use for Aedes aegypti control by location, period, amount, number of treated locations, and recipients, and the resistance status to the compound
| Population | Period of analysis | Temephos (Kg) | Number of treated establishments | Number of treated recipients |
| RR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando de Noronha | 2007–2010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
| Recife | 2007–2011 | 1.09 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 7.10 |
| Ipojuca | 2007–2011 | 3.087 | 85.222 | 138.801 | 3.49 | 21.4 |
| Olinda | 2007–2011 | 32.992 | 430.006 | 588.581 | 4.52 | 18.0 |
| Glória do Goitá | 2007–2010 | 4.157 | 64.056 | 152.853 | 3.62 | 72.0 |
| Santa Cruz do Capibaribe | 2007–2009 | 179.478 | 317.418 | 536.984 | 5.25 | 142.4 |
| Agrestina | 2007–2010 | 16.718 | 84.106 | 137.540 | 4.22 | 212.6 |
| Itaíba | 2007–2011 | 7.039 | 52.417 | 112.573 | 3.85 | 120.2 |
| Caruaru | 2007–2011 | 404.243 | 1.454.683 | 2.667.190 | 5.61 | 240.1 |
| Cedro | 2007–2009 | 1.713 | 41.791 | 114.300 | 3.23 | 132.7 |
| Salgueiro | 2007–2009 | 8.779 | 226.140 | 484.411 | 3.94 | 60.0 |
| Afogados da Ingazeira | 2007–2010 | 28.380 | 154.196 | 338.565 | 4.45 | 120.6 |
| São José do Egito | 2007–2009 | 26.390 | 134.771 | 365.777 | 4.42 | 124.7 |
| Serra Talhada | 2007–2011 | 96.985 | 457.761 | 1.128.263 | 4.99 | 200.20 |
| Arcoverde | 2007–2011 | 91.632 | 324.487 | 659.327 | 4.96 | 222.6 |
| Araripina | 2007–2009 | 26.719 | 182.570 | 434.923 | 4.43 | 252.7 |
| Petrolina | 2007–2011 | 10.849 | 388.677 | 578.950 | 4.04 | 38.9 |
Genotypic and allelic frequency of Aedes aegypti kdr mutation 1011 in pyrethroid susceptible and resistant individuals from municipalities in Pernambuco-Brazil
| Genotype | Allele frequency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Populations | Phenotype | Ile/Ile | Ile/Met | Met/Met | Total |
| S | R |
| Fernando de Noronha | S | (0.60) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| R | (0.30) | (0.70) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.65 | 0.35 | ||
| Recife | S | (0.66) | (0.34) | (0.0) | 9 | 18 | 0.84 | 0.16 |
| R | (0.44) | (0.56) | (0.0) | 9 | 0.72 | 0.28 | ||
| Ipojuca | S | (0.38) | (0.62) | (0.0) | 9 | 17 | 0.69 | 0.31 |
| R | (0.66) | (0.34) | (0.0) | 8 | 0.84 | 0.16 | ||
| Olinda | S | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 9 | 18 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| R | (0.88) | (0.12) | (0.0) | 9 | 0.95 | 0.05 | ||
| Glória do Goitá | S | (0.80) | (0.20) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.90 | 0.10 |
| R | (0.50) | (0.50) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.75 | 0.25 | ||
| Santa Cruz do Capibaribe | S | (0.40) | (0.60) | (0.0) | 10 | 17 | 0.70 | 0.30 |
| R | (0.57) | (0.43) | (0.0) | 7 | 0.78 | 0.22 | ||
| Agrestina | S | (0.10) | (0.90) | (0.0) | 10 | 18 | 0.55 | 0.45 |
| R | (0.37) | (0.63) | (0.0) | 8 | 0.68 | 0.32 | ||
| Itaíba | S | (0.60) | (0.40) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| R | (0.20) | (0.80) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.60 | 0.40 | ||
| Caruaru | S | (0.60) | (0.40) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| R | (0.70) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.85 | 0.15 | ||
| Cedro | S | (0.30) | (0.70) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.65 | 0.35 |
| R | (0.40) | (0.60) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.70 | 0.30 | ||
| Salgueiro | S | (0.40) | (0.60) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.70 | 0.30 |
| R | (0.0) | (1.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
| Afogados da Ingazeira | S | (0.70) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 16 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| R | (0.16) | (0.84) | (0.0) | 6 | 0.60 | 0.40 | ||
| São José do Egito | S | (0.30) | (0.70) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.65 | 0.35 |
| R | (0.20) | (0.80) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.60 | 0.40 | ||
| Serra Talhada | S | (0.20) | (0.80) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| R | (0.10) | (0.90) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.55 | 0.45 | ||
| Arcoverde | S | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 4 | 22 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| R | (0.65) | (0.35) | (0.0) | 20 | 0.82 | 0.18 | ||
| Petrolina | S | (0.70) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| R | (0.10) | (0.90) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.55 | 0.45 | ||
N, number of females; S, susceptible; R, resistant; Ile, isoleucine; Met, methionine.
Genotypic and allelic frequency of Aedes aegypti kdr mutation 1016 in pyrethroid susceptible and resistant individuals from municipalities in Pernambuco-Brazil
| Genotype | Allele frequency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Populations | Phenotype | Val/Val | Val/Ile | Ile/Ile | Total |
| S | R |
| Fernando de Noronha | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 9 | 19 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (0.90) | (0.10) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.95 | 0.05 | ||
| Recife | Susceptible | (0.67) | (0.33) | (0.0) | 9 | 20 | 0.84 | 0.16 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 11 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Ipojuca | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 8 | 18 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Olinda | Susceptible | (0.88) | (0.22) | (0.0) | 9 | 19 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (0.70) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.95 | 0.05 | ||
| Glória do Goitá | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 9 | 19 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Santa Cruz do Capibaribe | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 16 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Agrestina | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 18 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Itaíba | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (0.80) | (0.20) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.90 | 0.10 | ||
| Caruaru | Susceptible | (0.80) | (0.20) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Resistant | (0.70) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.85 | 0.15 | ||
| Cedro | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Salgueiro | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 9 | 17 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Afogados da Ingazeira | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 16 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| São José do Egito | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Serra Talhada | Susceptible | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Resistant | (1.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) | 10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Arcoverde | Susceptible | (0.50) | (0.50) | (0.0) | 2 | 22 | 0.75 | 0.25 |
| Resistant | (0.50) | (0.20) | (0.30) | 20 | 0.60 | 0.40 | ||
| Petrolina | Susceptible | (0.70) | (0.30) | (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| Resistant | (0.60) | (0.40) | (0.0) | 10 | 0.80 | 0.20 | ||
N, number of females; S, susceptible; R, resistant; Ile, isoleucine; Met, methionine.
Genotypic and allelic frequency of Aedes aegypti kdr mutation 1534 in pyrethroid susceptible and resistant individuals from municipalities in Pernambuco-Brazil
| Genotype | Allele frequency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Populations | Phenotype | Phe/Phe | Phe/Cys | Cys/Cys | Total |
| S | R |
| Fernando de Noronha | S | 9 (0.90) | 1 (0.10) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 19 | 0.95 | 0.05 |
| R | 8 (0.88) | 1 (0.12) | 0 (0.0) | 9 | 0.94 | 0.06 | ||
| Recife | S | 1 (0.11) | 8 (0.89) | 0 (0.0) | 9 | 19 | 0.55 | 0.45 |
| R | 1 (0.10) | 9 (0.90) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.55 | 0.45 | ||
| Ipojuca | S | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| R | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
| Olinda | S | 2 (0.22) | 7 (0.78) | 0 (0.0) | 9 | 19 | 0.61 | 0.39 |
| R | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
| Glória do Goitá | S | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| R | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
| Santa Cruz do Capibaribe | S | 3 (0.30) | 7 (0.70) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.65 | 0.35 |
| R | 1 (0.10) | 9 (0.90) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.55 | 0.45 | ||
| Agrestina | S | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| R | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
| Itaíba | S | 7 (0.70) | 3 (0.30) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| R | 6 (0.60) | 4 (0.40) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.80 | 0.20 | ||
| Caruaru | S | 2 (0.20) | 8 (0.80) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| R | 0 (0.0) | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
| Cedro | S | 2 (0.20) | 8 (0.80) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 19 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| R | 1 (0.11) | 8 (0.89) | 0 (0.0) | 9 | 0.55 | 0.45 | ||
| Salgueiro | S | 2 (0.22) | 7 (0.78) | 0 (0.0) | 9 | 19 | 0.61 | 0.39 |
| R | 2 (0.20) | 8 (0.80) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.60 | 0.40 | ||
| Afogados da Ingazeira | S | 7 (0.70) | 3 (0.30) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 19 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| R | 6 (0.67) | 3 (0.33) | 0 (0.0) | 9 | 0.83 | 0.17 | ||
| São José do Egito | S | 3 (0.42) | 4 (0.58) | 0 (0.0) | 7 | 17 | 0.28 | 0.72 |
| R | 10 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Serra Talhada | S | 5 (0.50) | 5 (0.50) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.75 | 0.25 |
| R | 4 (0.40) | 6 (0.60) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.70 | 0.30 | ||
| Arcoverde | S | 20 | ||||||
| R | 6 (0.30) | 14 (0.70) | 0 (0.0) | 20 | 0.65 | 0.35 | ||
| Petrolina | S | 4 (0.40) | 6 (0.60) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 20 | 0.70 | 0.30 |
| R | 4 (0.40) | 6 (0.60) | 0 (0.0) | 10 | 0.70 | 0.30 | ||
N, number of females; S, susceptible; R, resistant; Phe, Phenylalanine; Cys, Cysteine.