Literature DB >> 31175325

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma with TFE3 strong positive immunostaining: morphology, immunohistochemistry, and FISH analysis.

Bo Yang1, Haoqing Duan2, Wenfeng Cao1, Yuhong Guo1, Yanxue Liu1, Lin Sun1, Jingyi Zhang1, Yan Sun3, Yongjie Ma4.   

Abstract

TFE3 is accepted as a good marker for the diagnosis of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma. However, the significance of TFE3 in other types of renal cell carcinomas remains unclear. We examined the expression of TFE3 using immunohistochemistry by automated Ventana BenchMark XT system in 1818 consecutive renal cell carcinomas and verified the strong positive cases with TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization and RNA sequencing. Among the 27 renal cell carcinomas with TFE3 strong positive immunostaining, 20 cases were diagnosed as Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma, and seven cases were diagnosed as clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We further analyzed the morphology, clinicopathological features, and immunohistochemistry markers (CK7, CD117, CD10, P504s, vimentin, CA-IX, AE1/AE3, EMA, HMB45, Melan-A, and cathepsin K) of them. Pale to eosinophilic flocculent cytoplasm and psammomatous calcification were seen only in Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas (P < 0.05). Tumor necrosis occurred in all four cases of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas with pT3a stage, which had local recurrence and distant metastasis (two of them died) within 3 years. The expressions of Vimentin, CA-IX, AE1/AE3, and EMA were significantly different between them (P < 0.05). CA-IX was diffusely strong positive in clear cell renal cell carcinomas but negative or focally mild positive in Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas. Our study first demonstrates that a very small minority (0.4%) of clear cell renal cell carcinomas with TFE3 strong positive immunostaining, which points out a potential pitfall in diagnosis of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas by TFE3 immunohistochemistry. CA-IX is a good marker to distinguish clear cell renal cell carcinoma with TFE3 strong positive immunostaining from Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Tumor necrosis could be a potential factor relevant to pT3a stage, which may be a high-risk factor for the patients with Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31175325     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0283-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  6 in total

1.  TFE3 and TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate from common renal cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Anna Caliò; Stefano Marletta; Matteo Brunelli; Serena Pedron; Sofia Canete Portillo; Diego Segala; Elena Bariani; Stefano Gobbo; George Netto; Guido Martignoni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.535

2.  Clinicopathologic and molecular features of vascular tumors in a series of 118 cases.

Authors:  Huiting Wei; Tiantian Zhen; Ying Tuo; Hui Li; Jiangtao Liang; Shaoyu Chen; Huijuan Shi; Anjia Han
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 3.  [Characterization of different renal cell carcinoma entities].

Authors:  N J Rupp; H Moch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  A review of neoplasms with MITF/MiT family translocations.

Authors:  Shuanzeng Wei; Joseph R Testa; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Molecular Heterogeneity of Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Correlation Between Split Signal Pattern in FISH and Prognosis.

Authors:  Yiqi Zhu; Xiaohong Pu; Xiang Dong; Changwei Ji; Hongqian Guo; Dongmei Li; Xiaozhi Zhao; Weidong Gan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Clinicopathological Findings on 28 Cases with XP11.2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Levente Kuthi; Áron Somorácz; Tamás Micsik; Alex Jenei; Adrienn Hajdu; István Sejben; Dániel Imre; Boglárka Pósfai; Katalin Kóczián; Dávid Semjén; Zoltán Bajory; Janina Kulka; Béla Iványi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.201

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.