Albina Tyker1, Joel Franco2, Sean T Massa3, Shaun C Desai4, Scott G Walen2. 1. Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 S Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, United States of America. Electronic address: atyker.bus@gmail.com. 2. Saint Louis University Department of Otolaryngology, 3665 Vista Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America. 3. Washington University in Saint Louis Department of Otolaryngology, 1 Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America. 4. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform the first systematic review evaluating all established treatment modalities of head and neck lymphedema resulting from head and neck cancer therapy. Since craniofacial lymphedema treatment represents unique challenges not addressed by extremity lymphedema therapies, a systematic review and evaluation of treatment modalities specific to this area is needed to guide clinical management and further research. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases were searches from inception to September 2018. These included Scopus (Embase), PubMed (Medline), Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Databases. REVIEW METHODS: A search string was developed, and all databases queried for keywords on three subjects: head and neck cancer, lymphedema, and therapy. Results were uploaded to an EndNote database where relevant items were identified by hand-searching all titles and abstracts. Subsequently results were combined, duplicates removed, and full papers screened according to eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Of a total 492 search results, twenty-six items met eligibility criteria for this review. These included fourteen cohort studies, seven case reports, two randomized controlled trials, two systematic reviews, and one narrative review totaling 1018 study subjects. The manual lymph drainage group had the largest number of studies and participants, with fewer studies investigating selenium, liposuction, and lymphaticovenular anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Evidence for the efficacy of all types of lymphedema therapy is limited by paucity of large randomized controlled trials. While manual lymph drainage is best studied, liposuction and surgical treatments have also been effective in a small number of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To perform the first systematic review evaluating all established treatment modalities of head and neck lymphedema resulting from head and neck cancer therapy. Since craniofacial lymphedema treatment represents unique challenges not addressed by extremity lymphedema therapies, a systematic review and evaluation of treatment modalities specific to this area is needed to guide clinical management and further research. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases were searches from inception to September 2018. These included Scopus (Embase), PubMed (Medline), Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Databases. REVIEW METHODS: A search string was developed, and all databases queried for keywords on three subjects: head and neck cancer, lymphedema, and therapy. Results were uploaded to an EndNote database where relevant items were identified by hand-searching all titles and abstracts. Subsequently results were combined, duplicates removed, and full papers screened according to eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Of a total 492 search results, twenty-six items met eligibility criteria for this review. These included fourteen cohort studies, seven case reports, two randomized controlled trials, two systematic reviews, and one narrative review totaling 1018 study subjects. The manual lymph drainage group had the largest number of studies and participants, with fewer studies investigating selenium, liposuction, and lymphaticovenular anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Evidence for the efficacy of all types of lymphedema therapy is limited by paucity of large randomized controlled trials. While manual lymph drainage is best studied, liposuction and surgical treatments have also been effective in a small number of patients.
Authors: Sara C Parke; David Michael Langelier; Jessica Tse Cheng; Cristina Kline-Quiroz; Michael Dean Stubblefield Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 5.075
Authors: Paul Ramia; Larry Bodgi; Dima Mahmoud; Mohammad A Mohammad; Bassem Youssef; Neil Kopek; Humaid Al-Shamsi; Mona Dagher; Ibrahim Abu-Gheida Journal: Clin Med Insights Oncol Date: 2022-01-30
Authors: Sheila H Ridner; Mary S Dietrich; Jie Deng; Sandra L Ettema; Barbara Murphy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 3.603