Literature DB >> 31174920

Clinical expert consensus document on the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist support devices during complex high-risk indicated PCI: Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology Working Group Endorsed by Spanish and Portuguese Interventional Cardiology Societies.

Alaide Chieffo1, Francesco Burzotta2, Federico Pappalardo3, Carlo Briguori4, Roberto Garbo5, Giulia Masiero6, Elisa Nicolini7, Flavio Ribichini8, Carlo Trani2, Belén Cid Álvarez9, Oriol Rodríguez Leor10, Raúl Moreno11, Ricardo Santos12, António Fiarresga13, João Brum Silveira14, Armando Pérez de Prado15, Giuseppe Musumeci6, Giovanni Esposito16, Giuseppe Tarantini17.   

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is establishing as the last remaining revascularization option in an increasing number of patients affected by complex coronary artery disease not suitable for surgery. Over the past decade, percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) has increasingly replaced intra-aortic balloon pump to provide hemodynamic support during such non-emergent complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP) averting the risk of circulatory collapse and of adverse events in long lasting and/or complicated procedures. This review article aims to report the key factors to define CHIP, to summarize the available pLVAD which have CE mark for temporary mechanical LV support and to discuss the rationale of their use in this subset of patients. Based on the expertise of the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology working group, with the endorsement from Spanish and Portuguese Society of Interventional Cardiology working groups, it will provide several practical suggestions in regards to the use of pLVAD in different clinical CHIP scenarios.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31174920     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  10 in total

Review 1.  Role of Lithotripsy for Small Calcified Iliacs in the Era of Big Devices.

Authors:  Francesca Ristalli; Carlotta Sorini Dini; Miroslava Stolcova; Giulia Nardi; Serafina Valente; Francesco Meucci; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Myocardial ischemia and coronary disease in heart failure.

Authors:  Beniamino R Pagliaro; Francesco Cannata; Giulio G Stefanini; Leonardo Bolognese
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Elective High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Ming Bai; Andong Lu; Chenliang Pan; Sixiong Hu; Wenjing Qu; Jing Zhao; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Alaide Chieffo; Dariusz Dudek; Christian Hassager; Alain Combes; Mario Gramegna; Sigrun Halvorsen; Kurt Huber; Vijay Kunadian; Jiri Maly; Jacob Eifer Møller; Federico Pappalardo; Giuseppe Tarantini; Guido Tavazzi; Holger Thiele; Christophe Vandenbriele; Nicolas van Mieghem; Pascal Vranckx; Nikos Werner; Susanna Price
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Percutaneous left ventricular advanced support for 'protected' complex high-risk transcatheter mitral valve repair: a case series.

Authors:  Iacopo Muraca; Matteo Pennesi; Nazario Carrabba; Fernando Scudiero; Angela Migliorini; Niccolò Marchionni; Pierluigi Stefàno; Renato Valenti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-03

6.  Circulatory support with larger volume intra-aortic balloon pump vs. standard volume or no-balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. A randomised study.

Authors:  Aleksander Zeliaś; Wojciech Zajdel; Krzysztof Malinowski; Jolanta Geremek; Krzysztof Żmudka
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.426

7.  Temporal Trends and Site Variation in High-Risk Coronary Intervention and the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.

Authors:  Rory S Bricker; Thomas J Glorioso; Omar Jawaid; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Ehrin J Armstrong; Stephen W Waldo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Surgical Turned-Downed CHIP Cases-Can PCI Save the Day?

Authors:  Alexandru Achim; Madalin Marc; Zoltan Ruzsa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-07

9.  Long-term outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: An observational study.

Authors:  Yi-Xiong Huang; Zheng-Ming Xu; Li Zhao; Yi Cao; Yu Chen; Yi-Gang Qiu; Ying-Ming Liu; Peng-Yu Zhang; Jiang-Chun He; Tian-Chang Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 1.534

10.  Mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the multicenter, investigator-initiated IMPELLA-PL registry.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Aleksandra Gasecka; Marek Grygier; Tomasz Pawlowski; Jerzy Sacha; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.487

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.