Literature DB >> 31173802

Towards risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening. Adding risk factors to the fecal immunochemical test: Evidence, evolution and expectations.

Wessel van de Veerdonk1, Sarah Hoeck2, Marc Peeters3, Guido Van Hal2.   

Abstract

With increasing incidence and mortality, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a growing health problem worldwide. An effective way to address CRC is by screening for fecal (occult) blood by the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). However, there is room for improvement since precursor lesions and CRC bleed intermittent and can therefore be missed by the FIT (false negatives) or, the detected blood did not result from precursor lesions or CRC (false positives). This review provides the latest evidence on risk prediction models using FIT combined with additional risk factors before colonoscopy, which risk factors to include and if these models will better discriminate between normal findings and CRC compared to the FIT-only. Many prediction models are known for CRC, but compared to the FIT, these are less effective in detecting CRC. The literature search resulted in 645 titles where 11 papers matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Comparing the FIT-only with the risk prediction models for detecting CRC resulted in a significantly increased discrimination for the models. In addition, 2 different risk-stratification categories before colonoscopy were distinguished, namely the 1-model approach which combined risk factors with FIT results in a prediction model while the 2 step approach used risk factors apart from the FIT. Finally, combining FIT with CRC risk factors by means of a model before colonoscopy seems effective regarding discriminative power, however, more research is needed for validation combined with transparent and standardized reporting to improve quality assessment, for which suggestions are reported in this study.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal neoplasms; Early detection of cancer; Epidemiological methods; Occult blood; Public health; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173802     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Postoperative complications observed with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis of recently published studies.

Authors:  Chengkui Liu; Xiaoqing Li; Qingfeng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: review of international use and guidelines.

Authors:  Marije van Melle; Samir I S Yep Manzano; Hugh Wilson; Willie Hamilton; Fiona M Walter; Sarah E R Bailey
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 3.  A risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer prevention and diagnosis.

Authors:  Mark A Hull; Colin J Rees; Linda Sharp; Sara Koo
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Michael C S Bissell; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Steven R Cummings; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Ellen S O'Meara; Garth H Rauscher; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Karen J Wernli; Janie M Lee; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development.

Authors:  Jennifer Anne Cooper; Ronan Ryan; Nick Parsons; Chris Stinton; Tom Marshall; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.