Literature DB >> 31173427

Oncology health care professionals' perspectives on the causes of mental health distress in cancer patients.

Leeat Granek1, Ora Nakash2, Samuel Ariad3, Shahar Shapira4, Merav A Ben-David5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore oncologists, social workers, and nurses' perceptions about the causes of their cancer patient's mental health distress.
METHODS: The grounded theory (GT) method of data collection and analysis was used. Sixty-one oncology health care professionals were interviewed about what they perceived to be the causes of mental health distress in their patients. Analysis involved line-by-line coding and was inductive, with codes and categories emerging from participants' narratives.
RESULTS: Oncology health care professionals were sensitive in their perceptions of their patients' distress. The findings were organized into three categories, namely, disease-related factors, social factors, and existential factors. Disease-related themes included side effects of the disease and treatment, loss of bodily functions, and body image concerns as causing patient's mental health distress. Social-related themes included socio-economic stress, loneliness/lack of social support, and family-related distress. Existential themes included dependence/fear of being a burden, death anxiety, and grief and loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Oncology health care professionals were able to name a wide range of causes of mental health distress in their patients. These findings highlight the need to have explicit conversations with patients about their mental status and to explore their understanding of their suffering. A patient-centered approach that values the patient's conceptualization of their problem and their narrative to understanding their illness can improve the patient-provider relationship and facilitate discussions about patient-centered treatments.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; grounded theory; mental health distress; nurses; oncologists; oncology; qualitative methods; social workers

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173427     DOI: 10.1002/pon.5144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

1.  The impact of a "narrative interview" intervention in oncology. A study protocol for a feasibility study.

Authors:  Giovanna Artioli; Chiara Foà; Maria Bertuol; Linda Benzi; Laura Deiana; Chiara Meneghetti; Cecilia Neri; Laura Pigoni; Martina Zanotti; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-06-20

2.  Attitudes and opinions towards suicidality in professionals working with oncology patients: results from an online survey.

Authors:  Bianca Senf; Paula Maiwurm; Jens Fettel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Body image in patients with different types of cancer.

Authors:  Jan Brederecke; Anja Heise; Tanja Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.

Authors:  Natasha Michael; Alex Gorelik; Ekavi Georgousopoulou; Merlina Sulistio; Patrick Tee; Katherine Hauser; David Kissane
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.