Literature DB >> 31173220

Exosomes as carriers transporting long non‑coding RNAs: Molecular characteristics and their function in cancer (Review).

Damian Kołat1, Raneem Hammouz2, Andrzej K Bednarek2, Elżbieta Płuciennik2.   

Abstract

Long non‑coding RNAs (lncRNAs) comprise a sizeable class of non‑coding RNAs with a length of over 200 base pairs. Little is known about their biological function, although over 20,000 lncRNAs have been annotated in the human genome. Through a diverse range of mechanisms, their primary function is in the regulation of the transcription of protein‑coding genes. lncRNA transcriptional activation can result from a group of nucleus‑retained and chromatin‑associated lncRNAs, which function as scaffolds in the cis/trans recruitment of transcription factors, co‑activators or chromatin remodelers, and/or promoter enhancers. Exosomes are released as extracellular vesicles and they are produced by endocytic pathways. Their synthesis is initiated by various processes including ceramide synthesis, release of intracellular Ca2+ or acid‑base balance disorders. Prior to vesicle creation, selective cargo loading occurs in the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport. Participation of endosomal sorting proteins such as tetraspanins or specific sumoylated proteins required for transport has been indicated in research. The endosomal‑sorting complex consists of four components, these induce the formation of multivesicular bodies and the induction of membrane deformation to form exosomes. Nanovesicles could be formed inside multivesicular bodies to allow transport outside the cell or digestion in lysosomes. The molecular content of exosomes is more heterogenic than its synthesis process, with different cargoes being examined inside vesicles with regard to the type or stage of cancers. This paper will review the importance of lncRNAs as crucial molecular content of exosomes, indicating its involvement in tumour suppression, pro‑tumorigenic events and the development of novel therapeutic approaches in the near future. Further studies of their mechanisms of function are essential, as well as overcoming several challenges to gain a clearer insight to the approaches for the best clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173220      PMCID: PMC6625196          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

The term transcriptome encompasses the complete set of RNA molecules applying to an entire organism or specific cell type, making it more dynamic than the genome. It comprises several types of transcripts which are responsible for changes in gene expression. Two major classes of regulatory non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) which lack any transcriptive capability include microRNAs and long non-coding RNASs (lncRNAs). They play a significant role in diverse cellular processes from enabling normal development to disease progression, as well as cell communication. A valuable example of a biological carrier that can transport abundant quantities of lncRNA is that of the exosome: A type of extracellular vesicle involved in cell-to-cell communication and disease transmission. Its role has been documented in both physiological conditions and pathological changes such as cancer development, where they are responsible for the regulation of various processes including immunosuppression, proliferation and induction of pre-metastatic niche formation. In this review, the role of a number of exosomal lncRNA molecules will be discussed.

Characteristics of exosomes

The first scientific report to examine the possibility that intracellular structures could be associated with the process of budding vesicles bearing receptors during maturation, using ferritin-labelled proteins and anti-IgG, recorded the externalization of transferrin receptors into the intercellular space during sheep reticulocyte maturation (1). The term exosome was later proposed in 1987 (2). Exosomes are small spherical nanovesicles ranging from 20 to 120 nm (3,4). They belong to the group of membrane-derived vesicles known as extracellular vesicles (EVs), together with oncosomes, ectosomes or apoptotic bodies (5). The classification of each vesicle to its specific group depends on genesis, composition, size and density (see Table I). Extracellular vesicles can be secreted constitutively or as a result of specific induction (6). The origin of exosomes is linked to the creation of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) in the endosomal pathway; MVBs are structures with a lipid bilayer and a density of 1.12–1.19 g/Ml (7) and which display 5′ nucleotidase activity (8).
Table I.

Subdivision of extracellular vesicles based on their physiological features [based on (5,14,75)].

Extracellular vesiclesSizeDensityOrigin of vesicles
Exosomes20–120 nm1.12–1.19 g/mlMultivesicular body
Ectosomes~0.1–1 µm~1.16 g/mlCell membrane
Apoptotic bodies0.05–5 µm1.24–1.28 g/mlCell membrane
Oncosomes1–10 µmNot specifiedCell membrane
Exosomes are released from many types of healthy or tumour cells, although more abundantly in the latter (9), and can be found in the tumour microenvironment (TME) and blood samples of cancer patients (10). Physiologically, exosomes can be found in urine (10), sperm (3), amniotic fluid (9) and various other biological fluids. The role of exosomes in metastasis, angiogenesis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been confirmed in cancer development by various studies (9). Exosomes released by tumour cells were shown to constitute a leading source of antigens for dendritic cells inducing antitumour immune responses (11). The physiological functions of exosomes include cellular communication, immunity, infections, elimination of waste products and signalling (12). There is also evidence of their participation in aging-related diseases i.e. neurodegeneration when different types of mRNAs, miRNAs or lncRNA change their abundance inside nanovesicles (13).

Biogenesis

Exosome secretions and their molecular mechanisms are rather obscure, since their release is regulated by several signal molecules and various processes including ceramide synthesis and Ca2+signalling (3). Proteins that interact with the cell membrane and perform lipid bilayer deformation are epsin, amphiphysin, endofilin, syndapin and dynamin (4). The biogenesis follows the following sequence: The process begins with membrane invagination and exosome release to cytoplasm, followed by early endosome (EE) formation, and then the formation of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside the late endosome (LE). Under both normal and pathological conditions, exosomes have an endocytic origin and are released by different types of cells. Although exosomes typically mimic the composition of the parent cells, they may contain a few signature proteins. Following the formation of exosomes within the endocytic pathway, they are released from the plasma membrane via MVBs from early endosome maturation and may further fuse with lysosomes or the plasma membrane. The most common and well-known mechanism of cargo sorting is based on the action of proteins from Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) (6). When this pathway is inactivated, there is a possibility to recruit sumoylated protein hnRNPA2B1 [it binds microRNA (14)] or maintain the signal through tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs) composed of transmembrane glycoproteins (8,15). The schematic of ESCRT complex based on yeast, is shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.

ESCRT formation and cargo sorting of multivesicular body [based on (85)].

The most important proteins associated with ESCRT are: ALIX (ALG-2-interacting protein X), syndecan and syntenin (16). Syntenin ends the formation process through syndecan sorting and binding to ALIX, which affects ESCRT-III (4). Direct ALIX-syntenin interaction is possible through LYPX(n)L motifs (16), which are observed in the viral proteins found in late assembly domains (L-domains), these being responsible for recruiting the host ESCRT machinery directly or via ESCRT-associated proteins. The final product of this ESCRT and auxiliary protein activity is the creation of an MVB containing exosomes. Despite general syntenin-syndecan-ALIX axis, there are some other molecular individuals involved in controlling ESCRT. Examples are ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) GTPase and Phospholipase D2 (PLD2) enzyme which are considered as proteins associated with syntenin (17) and are responsible for the control of the budding of ILVs into MVBs (18). LIP5 (LYST-interacting protein 5), also known as vesicle trafficking 1 protein (VTA1), is a cofactor for Vps4 ATPase that enhances Vps4-mediated disassembly of ESCRT-III polymer (19). Cep55 (centrosomal protein 55) can mediate ALIX and ESCRT-I complex recruitment; however, interactions with the components of ESCRT-II and ESCRT-III have also been observed (20). Further examples consist of CD2AP (CD2-associated protein), IQGAP1 (IQ-motif-containing GTPase-activating protein 1) or ROCK1 (Rho-associated kinase 1) which are thought to interact with ALIX or TSG-101 (Tumor susceptibility gene 101). They participate in processes such as cytokinesis (20), viral budding (21) and cell polarity (22), respectively. Finally, enzyme heparanase, able to internally cleave heparan sulfate chains on syndecans, acts by increasing exosome production by stimulating intraluminal budding of syndecan and syntenin (23). After the ‘mature’ multivesicular body is formed, it can be transported to lysosomes (degraded hydrolytic enzymes) or interact with the lipid membrane, resulting in exosome release outside the cell. In the latter case, the attachment of MVB to the lipid bilayer takes place with the help of Rab-GTP and SNARE family proteins. Examples of these groups are given in Table II.
Table II.

Selected proteins involved in fusion of MVB with cell membrane and in exosome secretion [based on (3,4,7,87)].

ProteinProteins familyFunction
Rab7; Rab11RabGTPPromotes proper protein attachment in pathways dependent on calcium ions
Rab27 (a, b)RabGTPRegulates the stages of exosome secretion, controls the location of MVB
Rab35RabGTPRegulates exosomes secretion by interacting with GTP-activating protein- TBC1(Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16)
RAL-1RasGTPRecruiting the Syx-5 protein, thereby mediating in fusion of membranes
Syx-5 (Syntaxin5)SNAREStimulates fusion of MVB with cell membrane
VAMP7SNARENecessary for MVB fusion with cell membrane (Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein)
YKT6SNAREMediates the release of exosomes from the cell
Following the fusion of MVB and cell membrane, the exosomes can be transported to distant areas of the organism (via blood vessels) or interact with neighbouring cells (4). ‘Targeted’ cells can internalize nanovesicles in endocytic way where the absorption itself is facilitated through phagocytosis, fusion with cell membrane or ligand-receptor interaction. Fig. 2 presents the process of biogenesis, secretion and absorption of exosomes by means of ESCRT machinery.
Figure 2.

Biogenesis and destination of exosomes inside and outside the cell [based on (4,5,7,8,86)]. Nanovesicles in the multivesicular body can be transferred to lysosomes or be released from the cell to enter into blood vessels or fuse with neighboring cells. When entering the target cells, the exosome cargo can exert a different biological effect, resulting in changes in cell physiology for example-reprogramming it into a cancer cell.

Molecular content

Nanovesicle formation exhibits some characteristic stages of biogenesis and involves specific structures present in the cell. The selective mechanism of transporting cargo to the exosome interior is a more heterogenous process, as evidenced by their varied content, even in different types and stages of cancer development (8). The composition of exosomes contains countless types of proteins, including cytokines and growth factors, lipids or nucleic acids (3), including characteristic biomarkers such as CD63, CD81, CD9, TSG-101, ALIX or HSP70 which allow direct identification of exosomes (6).

Proteins

The profile of the proteins within the vesicles consists of cytoplasmic proteins, cell membrane proteins or proteins from endosomes; however, no proteins from organelles have been detected (6). These proteins include a number of exosomal molecules, such as those connected with MVB biogenesis (e.g., ALIX, TSG-101) (6), ESCRT components (3), transport and fusion proteins (annexin, Rab-GTP, flotillin) and heat shock cognate (HSC). Other important ones include integrins, tetraspanins or subunits of G proteins. The tumour exosomes (TEXs) include additional molecules that participate in the EMT process including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), IL-6, TGF-β and immunosupression factors (FasL, TRAIL and GAL-9 that stimulates T cell apoptosis) (8). Some of them are presented in Table III.
Table III.

Examples of exosomal molecules involved in tumour progression, immunosuppression and apoptosis [based on (3,4,6,10,88,89)].

Type of molecule in exosomeFunctionType of cells
ITG α6β4; ITG α6β1Connected with metastasis to the lungs, promotes TEXs adhesion in the lungsLung cancer cells
ITG αVβ5Connected with metastasis to the liver, binding to Kupffer cellsLiver cancer cells
TGF-β; IL-10; MCP-1 (Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1)Promote cell migrationLung cancer cells, melanoma cells
MHC-II (Major Histocompatibility Complex-II)Stimulation of CD4+ cellsB lymphocytes, DC cells
OVA (Ovalbumin) EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor);Inhibition of immune responseMelanoma cells
KRAS (Kirsten RAt Sarcoma viral oncogene homolog)Proliferation, resistance to treatmentLung cancer cells
EGFRvIII (EGFR variant III)Anti-apoptotic abilitiesGlioma cells
MDR-1 (Multi-Drug Resistance)Resistance for drugProstate cancer cells
HER2 (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2)Resistance to treatment with TrastuzumabBreast cancer cells

Lipids

The lipid composition of exosomes is distinct from that of the cell membrane: it is rich in components such as cholesterol, sphingomyelin, glycerophospholipids, phosphatydylinositol, ceramide or phosphatidilserine, as well as prostaglandins and leukotrienes (6). The lipid content in exosomes is higher than that of the parent cell except phosphatidylcholine which is ordinarily decreased (24). An example of exosomal lipid activity is the differentiation of bone-marrow myeloid cells into myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) by prostaglandin E2. The accumulation of MDSCs leads to immunosuppression, which provides favourable conditions for metastasis (8). The participation of lipids in the biogenesis of exosomes is summarized below (Table IV).
Table IV.

The examples of lipids involved in formation and secretion of exosomes [based on (9)].

LipidFunction
PhosphatidylserineParticipation in microautophagy connected with HSC70 protein (process of exosomes synthesis)
LysoBisPhosphAtidic (LBPA)Change in membrane dynamics (in collaboration with ALIX)
BisMonoacylglycerolPhosphate (BMP)Binding to ALIX protein; (BMP formed by PhosphoLipase D2)
CeramideInvolved in the biosynthesis of exosomes and packaging miRNA into them (in a process independent of the ESCRT machinery)
CholesterolParticipation in secretion of FLOT2-positive exosomes
Lipid rafts (cholesterol-rich sphingolipid microdomains)Participation in the biogenesis of exosomes inside MSCs (Mesenchymal Stem Cells)
Phosphatidylcholine transporter ABCA3Participation in the biogenesis of exosomes derived from B-cell lymphoma

Nucleic acids

Exosomes also can include different types of RNA or DNA such as mRNA, miRNA (6), lncRNA, dsDNA, RNA-ROR (regulator of reprogramming) (3), and therefore play a vital role in regulating signaling pathways and gene expression (refer to Table V). These DNA and RNA molecules may be transferred into recipient cell by the fusion of exosome and cell membranes, aiding the regulation of large numbers of signaling pathways or expression of genes (3). Many studies indicate elevated levels of lncRNA in extracellular exosomes compared to parent cells (25,26). This can be attributed to the action of nucleotide patterns that are present in transcripts as cis-acting elements responsible for targeting them into exosomes (27).
Table V.

The examples of nucleic acids that occur in exosomes [based on (3,6,90)].

Nucleic acidLength in base pairs (bp)Function
mRNA~3,250 bp (for TMPRSS2 in prostate cancer, TransMembrane PRotease Serine 2)Participation in metastasis, progression of cancer
lncRNAMore than 200 bpRegulation of gene expression at transcriptional, posttranscriptional and epigenetic levels
dsDNAMore than 2,500 bpParticipation in neoplasm (more frequent occurrences in tumour exosomes than exosomes from normal cells)
RNA-ROR~2,600 bpResistance to chemotherapy in HepatoCellular Carcinoma, promoting cancerogenesis through specific histone methylation
The purpose of this review is to highlight the significance of lncRNA as a pivotal molecule inside exosomes. Therefore, it will summarize the role of various exosomal lncRNAs, together with their function in carcinogenesis and in other biological processes.

lncRNA

The functional annotation of 60,770 full length longer cDNAs and rare transcripts in the mouse transcriptome resulted in the discovery of a novel class of non-coding cDNAs, among which ~80% of the transcripts are not spliced (28). The lncRNAs constitute a class of transcripts that does not encode proteins and whose length exceeds 200 bp (29). This group includes several heterogenous molecules that are difficult to categorize: LncRNAs can be divided into long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs), long intronic non-coding RNAs and half-STAU1-binding site RNAs (1/2sbsRNAs) (30). Depending on the DNA coding strand, the lncRNAs can be classified as sense or antisense transcripts (31). Some resemblance can be found between mRNAs and lncRNAs in some biochemical processes, for example mechanisms of polyadenylation and splicing or participation of RNA polymerase II in the process of their transcription (32). The roles of these molecules are connected with transduction signal, decoys, guides or scaffolds (31); however, their main function is associated with their action as transcription regulators of protein-coding genes (32). There is also the probability that lncRNAs act like a ‘sponge’-leading to miRNA recruitment into EVs, or possibly to provide the mechanisms required for microRNA loading (13). These findings confirm both the diversity of lncRNAs and their participation in carcinogenesis by demonstrating their influence on the promotion of angiogenesis, protein stability or miRNA inhibition by acting as a sponge. In addition, as lncRNAs are detected in TEXs or apoptotic bodies, and have high stability during circulation, they could be considered as potential cancer biomarkers (33); however, some studies indicate they may display tumour suppression behavior through the blocking of the transcription of apoptosis-inhibiting genes and stimulation of p53 expression (34) or the structural modification of chromatin (35).

lncRNAs as protumorigenic molecules

Numerous studies implicate lncRNAs as cancer-associated molecules that are enriched in exosomes. A classic feature of the tumour microenvironment is hypoxia, which has a notable impact on cancer progression. Activation of its pathway via the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) plays a part in metastasis and a more aggressive phenotype. The role of lncRNAs in hypoxia-driven cancer progression came into view recently, where these hypoxia-responsive lncRNAs play a critical part in regulating hypoxic gene expressions (36). The next subsections will present the characteristics of the most frequent types. HOTAIR: HOX Transcript Antisense RNA has been associated with progression and poor prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) (37). Yan et al (38) report the involvement of HOTAIR in the repression of WIF-1-a protein implicated in the Wnt signaling pathway. Moreover, epigenetic regulation is also achievable: It participates in the migration, invasion or proliferation, potentiating through silencing of miR-205 in bladder cancer. In addition, UBC cells displayed increased invasion with migration corresponding to regulation of the EMT pathway, which was confirmed by knockdown of HOTAIR. This resulted in reduced invasiveness by influencing genes connected with EMT such as MMP1 (Matrix metalloproteinase-1), ZEB1 (Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1), TWIST1 (Twist-related protein 1), SNAI1 (Snail family zinc finger 1), ZO-1 (Zonula occludens 1), LAMC2 (Laminin, gamma 2), LAMB3 (Laminin, beta 3) or ABL2 (ABL proto-oncogene 2) (37). Studies by Xie et al, have shown that salivary HOTAIR could be used as biomarker in diagnostics: it had good discriminatory power for differentiating pancreatic cancer from healthy patients and benign pancreatic tumour (39, 40). In addition to its contribution in cancerous diseases, HOTAIR has also been described to play a role in rheumatoid arthritis, where its transcript activates MMP-2 and MMP-13 in synoviocytes and osteoclasts. This could promote joint and cartilage matrix cessation advancing joint destruction. Furthermore, HOTAIR-loaded exosomes with enriched lncRNA activate macrophages and influence immune response (41). MALAT-1: Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript 1 or Nuclear-Enriched Abundant Transcript 2 (NEAT-2) was the first lncRNA to be associated with metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). This transcript, similar to the HOTAIR lncRNA, is also connected with migration or tumour growth induction. Zhang et al (42), indicated increased expression of transcript compared to healthy controls, and an association with higher TNM stage in patients with cancer. In vitro study knockdown of MALAT-1 in cancer cell lines significantly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation, although it also induced cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis due to a decrease in S phase progression. In addition, cyclin D1 and cyclin D2 downregulation was also observed, suggesting that MALAT-1 was involved in acceleration of the cell cycle. This indicates that MALAT-1 can be an important therapeutic target when developing treatments for NSCLC patients, because of its participation in the malignant phenotype of cancer through gene expression regulation (43). Alongside NSCLC, MALAT-1 has been proposed as a mediator of angiogenesis in Thyroid Cancer. Huang et al (44), found it to play a role in the secretion of the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF) protein from tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), which led to vascularization, promotion of proliferation, invasion and migration of cancer cells. Nonetheless, MALAT-1 participation in releasing inflammatory cytokines or FGF2 secretion was predominantly blocked by overexpression of FGF2. ZFAS1: Initial studies concerning the Zinc Finger AntiSense 1 (ZFAS1) lncRNA refer to alveolar development in the mammary gland, with a proposed role in the regulation of alveolar development and epithelial cell differentiation in the mammary gland (45). The transcript has been found to promote cancer progression by cell cycle regulation through cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) interaction or destabilization of the p53 protein. The level of ZFAS1 was also upregulated in exosomes from HCC, CRC and gastric cancer (GC). Pan et al (46), noticed that overexpression of this transcript leads to proliferation and migration of GC cells and ZFAS1-positive exosomes which can be internalized by MKN-28 cells. Knockdown of ZFAS1 inhibited the migration, proliferation and EMT process; however, it also induced cell cycle arrest and programmed cell death, serving as a potential tumour suppressor. These findings have been attributed to decreased ERK, Bcl-2 and increased Bax protein levels. Additionally, ZFAS1 knockdown was observed to suppress cell migration by decreasing the expression of EMT transcription factors such as Slug or Twist. These findings suggest that ZFAS1 could promote metastasis by cell cycle acceleration or support EMT playing a pivotal role in GC diagnosis (47). H19: H19 lncRNA is also involved in tumor metastasis and has been described as a master factor in cancer biology due to its frequent deregulation in almost all tumours, both in the initiation and progression steps (48). H19 is connected with the downregulation of E-Cadherin, which influences cell adhesion and leads to spread of cancer cells. In addition, Conigliaro et al (49) investigated H19 as a pro-angiogenic molecule promoting cell-to-cell adhesion (CD90+ cells with endothelial cell monolayer) and association with increased expression of VEGF and ICAM1 transcripts which in turn leads to new vessel development. H19 may also act as an epigenetic modulator or as miRNA sponge (50). In conclusion, this type of lncRNA could have a range of impacts on target cells and some of its functions still remain unknown; nevertheless, H19 has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target (e.g., in HCC) (51). POU3F3: In vitro studies indicate that this transcript increases viability and cell proliferation in gliomas and its overexpression is associated with tumour grading (52). Hu et al (53) investigated whether exosomal POU3F3 from glioma cells could promote angiogenesis and its effect on endothelial cells. They indicate that lncRNA enriched the exosomes regulating the migration, proliferation and angiogenesis of Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HBMECs) in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Silencing POU3F3 using shRNA decreased the migratory ability of endothelial cells but did not affect their motility. POU3F3 overexpression in HBMECs caused by lncRNA enriched exosome internalization, and significantly upregulated the transcript level of bFGF, bFGFR, Angio and VEGFA. These findings indicate that POU3F3 lncRNA can be an essential molecule in cell-to-cell communication or a regulator of angiogenesis in glioma cells (53). TUC339: One of lncRNA transcribed from ultraconserved elements (UCEs) is TUC339. UCEs are 100% maintained genomic sequences that are greater than 200 bases in length and are conserved across human, mouse and rat genomes (54). The localization of these elements is connected with fragile sites and cancer-associated regions of the genome. Overexpression of this type of lncRNA has been reported in HCC (55). A study on the role of exosomal ultraconserved lncRNA in modulating target cell phenotype as a result of genomic changes found that TUC339 upregulation in HCC cell lines resulted in an enhancement of cell growth and a reduction of adhesion to cell-extracellular matrix (ECM). The knockdown of TUC339 decreased proliferation and altered the expression of a total of 843 genes, 469 of which were inhibited (56). ROR: LncRNA ROR participates in liver cancer through disruption in TGF-β pathway. Although TGF-β has been related to cancer chemoresistance, the molecular actions involved in this event remain unknown. Takahashi et al (57), identified a possibly mechanism by which lncRNA may mediate chemoresistance dependent on TGF-β. They indicate that TGF-β reduced the sensitivity of HCC cells to sorafenib or doxorubicin, with a further reduction of sorafenib-dependent caspase 3/7 activity, leading to inhibition of the apoptosis process. Moreover, the release of extracellular vesicles and packaging of lncRNA within vesicles were also modulated by TGF-β. One of the selectively enriched exosomal lncRNAs thought to be a potential mediator of chemoresistance is RNA-ROR. Using a molecular pathway connected with p53 dependent signaling, lincRNA can contribute to tumor development by inhibiting apoptosis through the repression of p53. Additionally, knockdown of this lncRNA results in increased expression of Caspase 8 and GADD45B, leading to apoptosis induction and growth arrest. These data suggest that lincRNA ROR can be an important mediator in cell-to-cell communication and its contribution in chemoresistance has been confirmed in research. Inhibition of this transcript resulted in reversion of drug resistance, leading to cell death (58). VLDLR: One of the long-intergenic non-coding RNA transcripts that support HCC development is called VLDLR (59). By showing that knockdown of this RNA can result in cell cycle arrest in G1/S phase, Takahashi et al (60), confirmed that it regulates HCC cell proliferation. Moreover, the quantity of lncRNA was increased in both HCC cells and extracellular vesicles following chemotherapeutic stress caused by sorafenib, doxorubicin and camptothecin, thus enhancing cell viability. Furthermore, the extracellular transfer of VLDLR to adjacent tumour cells could participate in chemoresistance through the modulation of ABCG2 gene expression. The summary of the other lncRNA molecules that participate in tumour development is presented in Table VI.
Table VI.

Functions of chosen lncRNA molecules in numerous tumour types [based on (91–102)].

lncRNAFunctionTumor type(Refs.)
ARSRResistance to sunitinib; overexpression leads to poor response of renal cancer patients; promoting c-MET expressionRenal cell carcinoma (RCC)(91)
MEG3Cell cycle arrest; decreases apoptosis by regulation of miR-21Cervical cancer (CC)(92,93)
RMRPActs as a miR-206 sponge and modulate the cell cycle by regulating the Cyclin D2 expressionGastric cancer (GC)(94)
NEAT1Promotes cancer progression through regulating CDK6 mediated by influence on miR-107Laryngeal squamous Cell cancer (LSCC)(95)
UCA1Enhances cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT processBladder cancer (BC)(96)
HULCInduces angiogenesis and modulates VEGF expression; upregulates sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) by miR-107/E2F1 pathwayLiver cancer (LC)(97,98)
TUG1Promotes radioresistance and EMT transition; enhance proliferation and migrationBladder cancer (BC) Pancreatic cancer (PC)(99,100)
HOTTIPIncreases the chemoresistance by Wnt/β-catenin pathway activationOsteosarcoma(101)
CCAT2Upregulates VEGFA and TGFβ, promotes angiogenesis, decreases apoptosis by elevated Bcl-2 expression and inhibition of Bax and caspase-3Glioma cancer(102)

Suppressor function of lncRNA

In contrast to the lncRNAs with pro-cancerous properties, there is also another group of transcripts that could support normal cells rather than stimulating their conversion into a neoplastic phenotype (61). GAS5: Several studies have implied that the Growth Arrest Specific 5 gene molecule has not been connected with cancer progression, as its expression has been observed to be reduced in various cancer types (62,63). Pickard et al (64), noticed that GAS5 participates in apoptosis regulation in prostate cancer cells. They indicated that the high expression of GAS5 level reduces tumour cell survival and hence induces pro-apoptotic activity. On the other hand, when GAS5 was downregulated, programmed cell death was diminished but growth arrest was not. In prostate carcinoma GAS5 has been found to bind to the receptor domain and inhibit transcriptional stimulation, leading to increased death of tumour cells (65). PARTICL: Some studies also confirmed the role of lncRNAs in the methylation process in response to radiation. One of this lncRNA is PARTICL (promoter of MAT2A antisense radiation-induced circulating long non-coding RNA) a trans-acting mediator of DNA, and histone lysine methylation, a clever component for gene silencing (66). The findings indicate that in low dose irradiation, PARTICL can enhance EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) expression, which in turn catalyzes the addition of methyl groups to histone H3 at lysine 27. Moreover, there was also an observed increase in the activity of the DNMT1 enzyme (DNA methyltransferase 1), global methylome enhancement methylome regulation e.g., CpG island methylation of WWOX gene. Finally, speculation about PARTICL as an epigenetic modifying platform targeting chromatin structure modulation through recruitment of PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) has been proposed; this has been proposed to act by the binding of lncRNA to a subunit of PRC2 called SUZ12 (Suppressor of Zeste 12). These data indicate that PARTICL interlinks regulators of epigenetic modifications that may affect the suppression of transcription (67). CCND1: Another lncRNA found in exosomes (68) and connected with ionizing radiation-dependent transcription (69) is ncRNA CCND1 (cyclin D1). This single strand transcript binds to the TLS (translocated in liposarcoma) modulator, thus recruiting it to CCND1 promoter and inducing negative regulation of gene transcription. In addition, it also blocks the activity of CREB (cAMP response element binding) and p300 proteins. EXO1-4: The four molecules that occur abundantly in exosomes in cervical cancer were defined as Exo1-4 (70). Those transcripts contain DNase hypersensitive regions as well as RNAPII and CTCF binding sites (71). Exo1-4 is a subset of lncRNAs that modulate cell function through increasing recipient cell viability by binding to various proteins: For example, Exo2 directly interacts with lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB) while Exo4 reacts with high mobility group protein 17 (HMG-17). This speculates that lncRNA Exo1-4 has an impact on processes like cell metabolism or nucleosomal architecture.

lncRNAs as novel class of tumour biomarkers

Because lncRNA has greater tissue specificity than mRNA (72), these molecules may act as specific diagnostic biomarkers (73). When included in extracellular vesicles, circulation of RNA in body fluids is stable and able to resist the activity of ribonucleases (74), which makes them potential cancer prognostic markers (75). The profiles of lncRNA varies depending on tumour types that may be useful for clinical research, and moreover, these molecules could replace biopsies owing to the reduced level of invasiveness (76). Exosomal lncRNA can be nominated as cancer biomarkers but some of them are responsible for the development of other diseases (77). A set of differently expressed lncRNA associated with non-cancerous or cancerous diseases is shown in Table VII.
Table VII.

Participation of lncRNAs in various diseases [based on (77, 103–110)].

lncRNADiseaseFunction(Refs.)
CRNDE-hColorectal cancer (CRC)Promotes metabolic changes through insulin/IGF signaling(103)
p21Prostate cancer (PCa)Alter gene expression by modulating mRNA translation and suppressing the p53 or Wnt/β-catenin pathway(104)
PCA3Prostate cancer (PCa)Modulates the survival of cells downstream of androgen receptor signaling(105)
BCAR4Breast cancer (BC)Convert phenotype into an estrogen-independent, antiestrogen-resistant; tamoxifen resistance via HER2 signaling(106)
ATBHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Suppresses E-cadherin, leading to progression of epithelial tumor cells via inducing EMT(107)
ANRILNon-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)Affects proliferation and apoptosis using suppression of KLF2 and P21 transcription(108)
LINC00152Gastric cancer (GCA)Connects with depth of invasion among gastric cancer patients(109)
RP11-445H22.4Breast cancer (BC)Its expression levels correlated with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and menopausal status of the breast cancer patients; this molecule showed a remarkable improvement compared with CEA(110)
RP11-1382.1Chronic kidney disease (CKD)Unknown function(77)

Potential usefulness and perspectives

As a result of maintaining full stability of lncRNA in extracellular vesicles as mentioned earlier, these transcripts can be taken up by target cells with their full functionality preserved (78). This make EVs effective nanocarriers that are capable of regulating lncRNAs expression in cancer cells (79). An attractive potential tumour therapy that requires further development maintaining high levels of tumour suppressor lncRNAs or destabilizing oncogenic ones (80). H19 is an example of the use of pro-tumorigenic long non-coding transcripts in the specific targeting of tumour cells. The regulatory sequence of this lncRNA was used in the successful formation of the BC-819 plasmid. In vivo this construct encodes the toxin Diphtheria Toxin A (DTA) which provided encouraging results in the treatment of bladder or colon cancer, as well as pancreas carcinoma or NSCLC (81). There are also potential approaches to inducing overexpression of lncRNA MEG3 (Maternally Expressed Gene 3) in lung adenocarcinoma in order to increase sensitivity to cisplatin-based chemotherapy (82). Another potential type of lncRNA-based therapy exploits the ‘sponge’ activity of those transcripts, resulting in lowered miRNA activity in tumours (81). Looking prospectively, there are still many challenges to be tackled. Even following the identification of numerous lncRNAs connected with various diseases, there is still the need to identify more transcripts and clarify their mechanism of action. Unbiased genetic screening, lncRNA expression patterns and characterization of associated proteins should provide guidance. Moreover, the development of better technologies directed to improve lncRNA-based therapies will effectively expand their usage as therapeutic or diagnostic strategies. Finally, investigation of new tools using the epigenetic functionality of lncRNAs could help in the research and treatment of diseases that depend on epigenetics (83). When it comes to the development of exosomal lncRNA-based therapeutics, a few problems were identified including uncertain functionality in biological pathways, the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lncRNAs and the precise quantification of EV-bounded non-coding transcripts which need to be addressed accordingly (84). In conclusion, progressive studies of lncRNA properties can lead to their use as cancer biomarkers with high sensitivity and accuracy, resulting in early-stage detection, and improved performance of existing clinical biomarkers. Long non-coding RNA can either have a suppressive function in terms of cancer development, or promote its progression. A good example of transporters that carry lncRNAs are exosomes, participating in cell-to-cell communication and thereafter affecting physiological and pathological changes. There are still several challenges that needs to be tackled in order to provide efficient EV-based lncRNAs therapeutics for clinical application, but the current state of research offers promise.
  107 in total

1.  Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs.

Authors:  Y Okazaki; M Furuno; T Kasukawa; J Adachi; H Bono; S Kondo; I Nikaido; N Osato; R Saito; H Suzuki; I Yamanaka; H Kiyosawa; K Yagi; Y Tomaru; Y Hasegawa; A Nogami; C Schönbach; T Gojobori; R Baldarelli; D P Hill; C Bult; D A Hume; J Quackenbush; L M Schriml; A Kanapin; H Matsuda; S Batalov; K W Beisel; J A Blake; D Bradt; V Brusic; C Chothia; L E Corbani; S Cousins; E Dalla; T A Dragani; C F Fletcher; A Forrest; K S Frazer; T Gaasterland; M Gariboldi; C Gissi; A Godzik; J Gough; S Grimmond; S Gustincich; N Hirokawa; I J Jackson; E D Jarvis; A Kanai; H Kawaji; Y Kawasawa; R M Kedzierski; B L King; A Konagaya; I V Kurochkin; Y Lee; B Lenhard; P A Lyons; D R Maglott; L Maltais; L Marchionni; L McKenzie; H Miki; T Nagashima; K Numata; T Okido; W J Pavan; G Pertea; G Pesole; N Petrovsky; R Pillai; J U Pontius; D Qi; S Ramachandran; T Ravasi; J C Reed; D J Reed; J Reid; B Z Ring; M Ringwald; A Sandelin; C Schneider; C A M Semple; M Setou; K Shimada; R Sultana; Y Takenaka; M S Taylor; R D Teasdale; M Tomita; R Verardo; L Wagner; C Wahlestedt; Y Wang; Y Watanabe; C Wells; L G Wilming; A Wynshaw-Boris; M Yanagisawa; I Yang; L Yang; Z Yuan; M Zavolan; Y Zhu; A Zimmer; P Carninci; N Hayatsu; T Hirozane-Kishikawa; H Konno; M Nakamura; N Sakazume; K Sato; T Shiraki; K Waki; J Kawai; K Aizawa; T Arakawa; S Fukuda; A Hara; W Hashizume; K Imotani; Y Ishii; M Itoh; I Kagawa; A Miyazaki; K Sakai; D Sasaki; K Shibata; A Shinagawa; A Yasunishi; M Yoshino; R Waterston; E S Lander; J Rogers; E Birney; Y Hayashizaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Tetraspanins in viral infections: a fundamental role in viral biology?

Authors:  F Martin; D M Roth; D A Jans; C W Pouton; L J Partridge; P N Monk; G W Moseley
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Exosomes: from biogenesis and secretion to biological function.

Authors:  Sascha Keller; Michael P Sanderson; Alexander Stoeck; Peter Altevogt
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.685

4.  RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription.

Authors:  Philipp Kapranov; Jill Cheng; Sujit Dike; David A Nix; Radharani Duttagupta; Aarron T Willingham; Peter F Stadler; Jana Hertel; Jörg Hackermüller; Ivo L Hofacker; Ian Bell; Evelyn Cheung; Jorg Drenkow; Erica Dumais; Sandeep Patel; Gregg Helt; Madhavan Ganesh; Srinka Ghosh; Antonio Piccolboni; Victor Sementchenko; Hari Tammana; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  ESCRT & Co.

Authors:  Ingrid Roxrud; Harald Stenmark; Lene Malerød
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  BC-819, a plasmid comprising the H19 gene regulatory sequences and diphtheria toxin A, for the potential targeted therapy of cancers.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Benjamin J Davies
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2010-10

7.  Noncoding RNA gas5 is a growth arrest- and starvation-associated repressor of the glucocorticoid receptor.

Authors:  Tomoshige Kino; Darrell E Hurt; Takamasa Ichijo; Nancy Nader; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 8.  Rho-kinase/ROCK: A key regulator of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity.

Authors:  Mutsuki Amano; Masanori Nakayama; Kozo Kaibuchi
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09

9.  Induced ncRNAs allosterically modify RNA-binding proteins in cis to inhibit transcription.

Authors:  Xiangting Wang; Shigeki Arai; Xiaoyuan Song; Donna Reichart; Kun Du; Gabriel Pascual; Paul Tempst; Michael G Rosenfeld; Christopher K Glass; Riki Kurokawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  GAS5, a non-protein-coding RNA, controls apoptosis and is downregulated in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Mourtada-Maarabouni; M R Pickard; V L Hedge; F Farzaneh; G T Williams
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the role of exosomal non-coding RNA in the development, diagnosis, and treatment of gastric cancer (Review).

Authors:  Peng-Fei Gao; Da Huang; Jun-Yan Wen; Wei Liu; Hong-Wu Zhang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10

Review 2.  Role of taurine, its haloamines and its lncRNA TUG1 in both inflammation and cancer progression. On the road to therapeutics? (Review).

Authors:  Stella Baliou; Anthony M Kyriakopoulos; Demetrios A Spandidos; Vassilios Zoumpourlis
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  lncRNA ZNF649-AS1 Induces Trastuzumab Resistance by Promoting ATG5 Expression and Autophagy.

Authors:  Mingli Han; Xueke Qian; Hui Cao; Fang Wang; Xiangke Li; Na Han; Xue Yang; Yunqing Yang; Dongwei Dou; Jianguo Hu; Wei Wang; Jing Han; Fan Zhang; Huaying Dong
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Tumor exosome promotes Th17 cell differentiation by transmitting the lncRNA CRNDE-h in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junfeng Sun; Haowei Jia; Xingqi Bao; Yue Wu; Tianyu Zhu; Ruixin Li; Hongchao Zhao
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  Response of human macrophages to gamma radiation is mediated via expression of endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Natallia Mikhalkevich; Ina P O'Carroll; Rok Tkavc; Kateryna Lund; Gauthaman Sukumar; Clifton L Dalgard; Kory R Johnson; Wenxue Li; Tongguang Wang; Avindra Nath; Sergey Iordanskiy
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 6.  Exosomes: From Potential Culprits to New Therapeutic Promise in the Setting of Cardiac Fibrosis.

Authors:  Roman Tikhomirov; Benedict Reilly-O' Donnell; Francesco Catapano; Giuseppe Faggian; Julia Gorelik; Fabio Martelli; Costanza Emanueli
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 7.666

7.  Caspase-3 Cleaves Extracellular Vesicle Proteins During Auditory Brainstem Development.

Authors:  Forrest Weghorst; Yeva Mirzakhanyan; Kian Samimi; Mehron Dhillon; Melanie Barzik; Lisa L Cunningham; Paul D Gershon; Karina S Cramer
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 6.147

8.  A novel brain targeted plasma exosomes enhance the neuroprotective efficacy of edaravone in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Lin Guo; Junlu Pan; Fang Li; Liang Zhao; Yijie Shi
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.050

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.